Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Signed Certificate of Live Birth for BO

Posted on 10/20/2009 6:54:41 AM PDT by rocco55

I received a signed COLB this AM. It is in a PDF format. I cannot find how to paste it into the post ? I don't now if it's real, but appears to be from a law firm last night at approx. 11:30 PM.

Does anyone know if a PDF file can be posted ?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; obama; orly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-222 next last
To: MHGinTN
Look at the formation of the "n" in the two signatures ... when the hand does not lift from the paper, the natural motion is distinctive and the "n" is duplicated in both signatures.

I agree with you. To me it is obvious that the same person signed those. Wouldn't you know the third signature is unreadable. Let's not forget that Madelyn mispelled her own signature!!

121 posted on 10/20/2009 11:37:40 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: mlo

That Quacks me up. LOL

You are a good sport.


122 posted on 10/20/2009 11:47:09 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
The format matches the Nordyke twins’ BC. Does your son's? What year is your son's?
123 posted on 10/20/2009 11:49:07 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
>Right! Everything connected with bo is a hoax; we learned that almost two years ago.

Even if it is genuine, it has to be verified by Hawaii, Kenya, Obama, or the courts do it through discovery.

124 posted on 10/20/2009 11:51:21 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
maybe “Hutpital”didn’t look right?

*Snicker*

125 posted on 10/20/2009 11:53:49 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Photoshop 3.0


126 posted on 10/20/2009 11:59:34 AM PDT by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

The hut and nut job you should be concerned about occupies the White House.


127 posted on 10/20/2009 11:59:46 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

It is possible that the original BC was prepared in 1961, perhaps with a reference in field 23 to an earlier statute.

But subsequently the note in field 23 was entered after the 1982 statute change to include the reference to the grandmother as the source of the report of birth to make the BC as amended with that information more consistent with that 1982 statute.

The BC on file in HI vital statistics is a work in progress and subject to repeated amendments which I believe are made on the face of the original document!


128 posted on 10/20/2009 12:04:03 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: WhizCodger

Have you seen this one from Africa?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=105764


129 posted on 10/20/2009 12:06:21 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: missnry
If people of the same era write a cursive “n” in the same way it is proof of nothing more than that they learned to make “n” the same way.

I don't see any misspelling of Madlyn’s signature.

130 posted on 10/20/2009 12:06:33 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

‘86....but HRS 338-17.8 was passed in 1982. Both of us found that little discrepancy, ergo the Certificate is bogus.


131 posted on 10/20/2009 12:06:56 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

“...but HRS 338-17.8 was passed in 1982. Both of us found that little discrepancy, ergo the Certificate is bogus.”

A 1961 BC could have been modified in field 23 subsequent to 1982.


132 posted on 10/20/2009 12:11:46 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: mlo

BP2 is NO troll!! CO


133 posted on 10/20/2009 12:12:58 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Yes, that’s possible but on a real document there’s a statement at the bottom of the page that warns ‘any alterations invalidate this document’.


134 posted on 10/20/2009 12:17:28 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: WhizCodger; LucyT

Actually, the data in the document is pretty interesting. First, it says that it as signed by the grandma, Madelyn Dunham and second, it says that she was “reporting” the birth, which could be consistent with the baby being born elsewhere, but the birth certificate being “reported”.


135 posted on 10/20/2009 12:18:21 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

That was mlo’s version of ‘get up on the porch’ ...


136 posted on 10/20/2009 12:22:03 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: GreenAccord

my thought exactly


137 posted on 10/20/2009 12:22:25 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

On my Certificate of Naturalization it says Country of former origin and it mention that country, NOT USA!!!


138 posted on 10/20/2009 12:24:41 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Fred Nerks

I wish people would at least READ the document. It purports to a birth in Kenya, registered in Honolulu. Everything in the document is consistent with a Kenyan birth. Remember, both African BC documents are accurate in detail, though they could be fake. This one could also go down as fake, but accurate, or perhaps a forgery that is made at a later date.


139 posted on 10/20/2009 12:24:43 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader

This is an altered exhibit. Look at the pre-printed protion of field 17b ... that’s right, it is partially erased/blacked out, then the ‘spreckle’ pattern applied over it.


140 posted on 10/20/2009 12:34:02 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson