Skip to comments.
FREEP THIS POLL: A bill is being passed around capitol hill, $3,500 in tax cuts for pet owners.
KGUN9.com ^
| 10-14-2009
| KGUN9.com
Posted on 10/14/2009 10:22:04 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG
A bill is being passed around capitol hill, $3,500 in tax cuts for pet owners. Is this a good idea? Yes No Undecided
(Excerpt) Read more at kgun9.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: gopbill; mccotter; pets; poll; republicansponsored; taxes; veterinary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Our "leaders" are idiots. Sadly this may get more support than any meaningful steps to stimulate our economy or keep our nation secure.
A bill is being passed around capitol hill, $3,500 in tax cuts for pet owners. Is this a good idea?
Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far.
Yes 38% (We love kittens and puppies. Vote for us!)
No 58% (We hate kittens and puppies and want them to suffer)
Undecided 4% (We don't have a clue but this button is sooooo shiny and pretty)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Our three dogs think it’s a great idea. They are holding out for full dependent status, however.
2
posted on
10/14/2009 10:23:21 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: AZ .44 MAG
3
posted on
10/14/2009 10:23:25 AM PDT
by
dragonblustar
("... and if you disagree with me, then you sir, are worse than Hitler!" - Greg Gutfeld)
To: dynachrome
This poll could use a bit of Feeping.
4
posted on
10/14/2009 10:23:40 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(A society that doesn't protect its children doesn't deserve to survive.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Where is the bill for tax cuts for people who buy guns?
5
posted on
10/14/2009 10:24:14 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Obama, Hitler, Stalin: Who are 3 people nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Yeah, it’s gonna be just as great as Cash for Clunkers program. CRA!
6
posted on
10/14/2009 10:25:25 AM PDT
by
TheDailyChange
(Politics,Conservatism,Liberalism)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Our little dog is not cheap to look after, but NO WAY do I want her as a Tax deduction. Our Dog, Our Money, Our Expense.
7
posted on
10/14/2009 10:26:00 AM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(We the people, ..... never)
To: dragonblustar
Save the kitties! They are our overlords. We serve them anyway. Might as well get a tax break for it, right?
8
posted on
10/14/2009 10:26:03 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(A society that doesn't protect its children doesn't deserve to survive.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Why stop there... get pets on the health entitlement and of course they should collect social security. ;-)
9
posted on
10/14/2009 10:26:37 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: AZ .44 MAG
So, let me get this straight...I get more of a tax break taking good care of my pets than I do for my children?
To: rhombus
Oh yes... and of course pets should have the “right” to marry... anybody and anything they want. ;-)
11
posted on
10/14/2009 10:27:30 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: AZ .44 MAG
I would take a tax credit; however, people need to see what the Congress critters are slipping into this bill. Of course, they can add to it if passed and that’s why I would have to say no.
12
posted on
10/14/2009 10:28:05 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: AZ .44 MAG
I had heard this, hoped it wasn’t true! Are any GOP sellouts behind this nonsense?
13
posted on
10/14/2009 10:28:16 AM PDT
by
AuntB
(If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
To: Red in Blue PA
Where is the bill for tax cuts for people who buy guns? Some rights are more equal than other rights. The right to affordable pet care is more important than the Second Amendment. Just ask PETA.
14
posted on
10/14/2009 10:28:21 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(A society that doesn't protect its children doesn't deserve to survive.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Flip the coin ...
Increase the taxes for those who will not or can not have pets. i.e. family allergies
Just reason number 6118 to fire everyone within the beltway.
To: TheDailyChange
Yeah, it’s gonna be just as great as Cash for Clunkers program. CRA!CRA=Canine Rehabilitation Act?
16
posted on
10/14/2009 10:29:43 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(A society that doesn't protect its children doesn't deserve to survive.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Here are the results so far
Yes 36%
No 61%
Undecided 3%
The number of votes is not disclosed
I think pets are great BUT ............
17
posted on
10/14/2009 10:32:04 AM PDT
by
TYVets
(Let’s Roll!!! The leadership of the GOP has no spine and no guts, but we conservatives do)
To: AZ .44 MAG
We just spent twelve hundred dollars on one of our dogs surgery and NO WAY do I support a tax cut for pets.
18
posted on
10/14/2009 10:32:24 AM PDT
by
ladyvet
(WOLVERINES!!!!!)
To: AuntB
I had heard this, hoped it wasn’t true! Are any GOP sellouts behind this nonsense? I don't know for sure but based on past performance I'd say Lindsey Grahamnesty, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and Juan McPain are probably cosponsors.
19
posted on
10/14/2009 10:33:49 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(A society that doesn't protect its children doesn't deserve to survive.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Some rights are more equal than other rights. The right to affordable pet care is more important than the Second Amendment. Just ask PETA.
Actually, if one really looks into PETA, they are anti-pet ownership.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson