Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recent discovery of a Roman Coin Hoard in the Shrewsbury Area[UK][10K Coins]
Finds ^ | 07 Sep 2009 | Daniel Pett

Posted on 09/10/2009 8:45:56 AM PDT by BGHater

A very large and important find of a hoard of Roman coins was recently discovered by a novice metal detector user in the Shrewsbury area. This is probably one of the largest coin hoards ever discovered in Shropshire. The finder, Mr Nic. Davies, bought his first metal detector a month ago and this is his first find made with it. The hoard was discovered close to a public bridleway on land that Mr Davies did not have permission to detect on. All land is owned by someone and it is important that permission to search is obtained in advance. The coins were placed in a very large storage jar which had been buried in the ground around 1700 years ago. They had lain undisturbed since then waiting for someone to find them again.

Mr Davies, excavated the hoard and brought all his finds to Peter Reavill, Finds Liaison Officer for the Portable Antiquities Scheme based with Shropshire Council Museum Service. Hoard’s such as this are covered by the Treasure Act, being more than 10 coins of less than 10% precious metal which have been deliberately hidden. By law all finds which represent Treasure must be reported to HM Coroner. The hoard of coins will be taken to the British Museum for detailed conservation and full identification, a report will be sent to the Coroner and it is hoped that the museum service will acquire them to be displayed in the New Museum planned for the Music Hall, in Shrewsbury.

From a brief look at the hoard there seems to be a minimum of 10,000 coins; the majority of which are corroded together in the pot. The finder did not touch the coins from within the pot and this will mean that staff at the British Museum will be able to excavate the coins carefully. This will enable them to know whether the coins were placed in the pot all at the same time, or were added to piecemeal over time. The coins are all bronze (copper alloy), and some of them have been silver washed. They are known as nummi (which just means coin) and were common during the 4th century AD. From the coins which have been provisionally identified they seem to date from the period 320 – 340 AD, late in the reign of Constantine I and the House of Constantine. Amongst the coins are issues celebrating the anniversary of the founding of Rome and Constantinople. In total the coins and the pot weigh in excess of 70 lbs. The pottery vessel is very large and probably used in the domestic part of a farmhouse as a large storage jar. It does not seem to be locally made. It is very fine being extraordinarily thin.

The finder marked the findspot and subsequently took Peter Reavill and archaeologists from Shropshire Council to the findspot. A small excavation was undertaken with the hope of understanding how the coins were placed in the ground. This was a success and it seems most likely that the pot was buried in the ground probably part full and was subsequently topped up before a large stone was placed on top acting as a marker. The top of the pot had been broken in the ground and a large number of the coins spread in the area. All of these were recovered during the excavation with the help of a metal detector. This added at least another 300 coins to the total. We now know that there are no more coins (or another hoard) in the area. The coins within the hoard represent some of the most commonly found coins from Roman Britain; most metal detectorists will have one or two in their collection. The importance of this find is the sheer number, or material wealth they represent. It is likely that the hoard represents a person or communities wealth, possibly as a payment for a harvest. Why it was not collected by the owner is a mystery – but one that we can share and enjoy 1700 years after the fact.

“This is a very exciting find and probably the largest coin hoard, at least in modern times, to be recovered from the County.” says Emma-Kate Lanyon, Curator for Shropshire Council Museum Service.

“The Treasure Act and Portable Antiquities Scheme is now nearly 12 years old and has vastly increased our understanding of Shropshire’s past by bringing finds like this to the attention of archaeologists. It has also provided the museums with the opportunity to acquire these artefacts for future research and display. The Museum Service will acquire the hoard with the intention to display it in the new Shrewsbury Museum planned for the Music Hall site in Shrewsbury. “

The coins will be taken to London for detailed study, a report will then be sent to the Coroner and the find will be valued by a Government panel. Thanks are extended to the Coroners Service, Shropshire Council, English Heritage and the British Museum all of who have contributed to this exciting find. For more information on the Treasure Act and the work of the Portable Antiquities Scheme either visit the website www.finds.org.uk, contact Peter Reavill on 01584 813641 or visit one of his regular finds days. If anyone has found Roman coins, or other finds I would be happy to see them – I have a finds day at the Guildhall, Newport (Shropshire) on Saturday 12th September between 11-2pm organised by Newport History Society.



TOPICS: History; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: coin; coins; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; metaldetecting; roman; romanempire; shrewsbury; shropshire; treasure; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: BGHater; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
70 pounds? Would be more appropriate to say 'five stone'. ;') Thanks BGHater.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


21 posted on 09/10/2009 2:48:03 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I must show this to my husband!


22 posted on 09/10/2009 3:08:36 PM PDT by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

I got into buying some of those from ebay a few years back.

Out of the 25 or so I got, only two or three turned out nicely. One was a very fine specimen of a Denarius issued under Constantine the Great that has on the backside a picture of Romulus and Remus suckling on a wolf. It was part of the basically millenium collection of the City of Rome (which was already about 800 years old at Christs birth!)


23 posted on 09/10/2009 4:25:56 PM PDT by djf (I ain't got time to read all the whines!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: djf
Just imagine how it would feel stumbling on to something like that...
24 posted on 09/10/2009 4:39:06 PM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
I submit the following to enlighten you and others who labor under the misconception that England would “short” the finder. In reality, England has the most enlightened laws on found treasure of any country in the world. English law in this case states that the finder and the landowner in 50/50 partnership will either get the hoard back, or will receive the fair value of the hoard as determined by experts. And found material is valued fairly, as proven by past cases. If a museum desires the material, they have to come up with the money and if they can't do so or don't want the coins, they are returned. If only other countries were so enlightened, ancient coin finds would be reported in other countries, instead of entering the black market. Were I to find such coins in England, I would report them, and would be assured of a fair outcome.
25 posted on 09/10/2009 5:00:57 PM PDT by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
...remember the Romans inflated their currency also!

LOL! What? They printed more bronze?

26 posted on 09/10/2009 6:09:16 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

LOL! What? They printed more bronze?


What was once pure silver/gold become alloys, coins were clipped or made smaller, common copper replaced precious metals for the same stated face values. In fact, the Romans engaged in serious “money printing” and highly inflationary policies such as price controls, or controls on labor (forcing labor to stay on the farms) which led to the system of serfdom in the middle-ages.

There is nothing new under the Sun. Mankind keeps making the same mistakes over and over again.


27 posted on 09/10/2009 10:18:16 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Of course, in contrast to the neo-fascist, reactionary, power-crazed British monarchy, the Federal and State Governments of the USA are always completely fair, non-manipulative, and thoroughly caring of the citizens who, after all, are the ones they work for.

Do I even need a /sarc tag? Governments do as Governments do.

The law in Britain on finding hoards is designed purely so that Museums and other academic institutions get first pick on them. And that’s fine as far as I’m concerned. I don’t want the historical heritage of Britain to be completely dispersed to all and sundry purely on the basis of vulgar commercialism. A fair and equitable price will be set by the commission on antiquities, and incidentally, it really IS a fair and equitable price - at least I’ve never heard of any finder complaining about what they got.


28 posted on 09/11/2009 12:35:10 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater; squarebarb

Perhaps the original owner was saving up for a cow!


29 posted on 09/11/2009 12:36:28 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

It might sound that way, but it is not the case. The compensation is quite honestly very fair.

In fact, I would guess that, apart from their historical and academic interest, these things are probably not all that valuable. There might be a lot of coins but they are base metal and not in particularly good condition either.


30 posted on 09/11/2009 12:39:27 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

and very good rules they are too.


31 posted on 09/11/2009 12:40:37 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PGR88; seowulf
There is nothing new under the Sun. Mankind keeps making the same mistakes over and over again.

So, they coined more "gold." Nothing new indeed.

Yes, after I posted, I realized that we have done the same with our coins. Pennies aren't copper, and silver coins aren't silver. Goodness gracious, what's next? The nickel?

Then I saw that seowulf mentioned the same thing. Sigh... I'm never too old to learn about perfidy in gubmint.

32 posted on 09/11/2009 3:12:49 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson