Posted on 08/09/2009 4:45:11 PM PDT by Polarik
Basically, it comes down to this. I made a promise to my family get off of here, but continued to break that promise. There is sufficient momentum for the birth certificate issue to where any further research is unnecessary.
The fact that Hawaii refuses to authenticate or acknowledge producing the COLB that the libs insist that is real, along with the statements made to me by Dr. Alvin Onaka in late October, pretty much nixes any hope by the opposition that a real Obama 2007 COLB exists.
The libs can refute my research all they want, but it's not going change the reality that they are arguing about a nonexistent document.
It is they who are on the wrong side of reality, not me.
My last post says it all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2311347/posts
If anyone believes that the one and only scan image was produced by what appears in the Factcheck photos, then there is seriously something wrong with their eyesight.
There is nothing wrong with the eyesight of scores of FReepers who saw shadows under the letters on the Factcheck photograph of a "real COLB."
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/two-certfs.jpg
The image above is the photo I took of a real COLB using the same make and model of camera as Factcheck, except that I had a real COLB. The one on the bottom is the image with the shadows. Those pink arrows are pointing to them.
I would sincerely love to hear how the opposition explains those, but I gotta go.
I also leave with the challenge I made but never taken:
Make a real scan, naturally and honestly, that looks like the alleged "scan image."
No one can. It's impossible for several reasons. The colors of this image are so far off from the actual colors contained in a real COLB scan, that you cannot get there without extensive manipulation of the color curves.
Secondly, the background image and the text were deliberately subjected to heavy sharpening using an Unsharp Mask - but they were not done at the same time.
Lastly, that "funky" border, as one of my favorite critics described it, will not be exactly reproducible from any scanned COLB border in existence.
"Close" only counts in horseshoes.
No way. No how.
Oh, you may get close after playing around with all of the controls in Photoshop, but you will not get the border pattern right.
I know because I reproduced it (middle image), and I know how it was done - it was made separately and added to the image.
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/FactCheck%20Originals/BORDER-COMPARISON.jpg
But, if you think you can do it, more power to you.
Rather than ragging on my research, which is what I do better than anyone, go ahead and do your own.
It's easy.
Oh, I forgot. You have to get a real COLB to do it.
Isn't it funny that none, nada, zip, zero of my critics has ever made a real COLB scan from a real COLB in over a year since I began my research, and actualy replicated what I did.
They'll make up some excuse for not reading all of my research report, like it was "too painful to read," and so forth. Then, they will do their own thing which is not remotely close to my thing.
Well, don't be discouraged: Factcheck never had a real COLB, either.
I would like to thank everyone who supported me and those who know me will be passing along the latest news on FR to me.
BUT, I am never logging back on FR as Polarik again.
That's a promise I will keep.
Thank for all your hard work Polarik.
I hope we can do something to stop 0bama from dumping on America before it turns into a giant dung pile.
Otherwise, I’ll probably be seing you in the gulag.
You're very keen on playing the victim. Are you sure you're not a closet liberal?
Are you now or were you ever a liberal? Do you now or have you ever associated, socialized, commiserated, or identified with a liberal? Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of public opinion.
Kidding. I'm kidding. (I know - bowl's over there. Ew, cornflakes? Yuck.)
Then why do people ping to “All”?Because it used to work that way, now a ping to all pings no one.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
So it IS A LEFT WING CONSPIRACY that started with the fake birth announcements 40+ years ago!!! I knew it!!!!!
Thanks for all your work & research.
BTW, you are named in the current Globe magazine about Odumbos fake birth certificate. Good going!!
The rest have said it all, but I will add mine. Sorry you’re going. Many thanks. Hope you get to read this thread before leaving. God’s blessings to you and yours.
First off, let me say that I have never read Polarik’s report.
I have no degree, my photoshop skills are entirely self taught, and I consider myself a rank amateur at picture manipulation.....
However, I know that Obama’s COLB is a forgery and can prove it very simply.
Just perform my simple test.
“The simple test”
Get one paper with the same background as Hawaii’s COLB
Scan it
Using a photoshop program type all the information on Obama’s COLB into a white background select the text with the Magic wand tool then cut and paste it onto the scan of that image
Merge the layers.
Then using the original sheet of paper and an word processor type (Using a Laserjet) the exact same info onto the original sheet of paper
scan it as well.
Then compare the two images with Obama’s COLB’s from the daily Kos, Fcatcheck.org and Fight the Smears and see which one of your’s appears to be the same as those he claims are real.
That’s all there is to my simple test.
To date no one has attempted this test or tried to use it against me to prove Obama’s COLB is the genuine article. That leads me to believe what I already know.
This test shows Obama’s COLB is clearly a forgery.
When they could not disprove Doctor Polarik’s report, they chose itself to hunt down his Identity and expose him as a fake doctor (PHD) then they have even hinted that his schooling wouldn’t give him the expertise to come up with the results he posted in his report.
Intelligence is not knowing all the answers, intelligence is knowing how to find the answers, that is the benchmark of a PHD.
Men and women that have earned that title know how to do research and publish their research in a document on any sort of subject that chooses their fancy. That’s why our Colleges and Universities put such High standards on such titles, and that is why businesses and government respect the title doctor, it is well earned.
Doctor Polarik could have easily produced a paper on the mating habits of the Columbian tree frog, instead he chose to document a forgery used to enable someone to gain the white house and the presidency through fraud.
And to date most of what has been said to disprove his efforts have been personal attacks on the man himself rather than the results of his efforts. That sort of bias towards scientific data is prejudicial and has no place in the search for the truth, and certainly would never be accepted in a Doctorate Thesis.
As for me, my search for the truth is simple, just like me.
And the truth will always be proved eventually even if it is with a simple test....
I had no idea!
Thank you for letting me know!!!
I will miss you.
This should make the cheeky Kenyan bastard and his crooks happy you are leaving the scene.
Not I.
Again, you will be missed.
Thank you for your hard work and dedicated service and research.
Another good soul gone.
So YOU’RE the one....
LOL!
hey, what can I say?
I’m famous for a LOT of things!
I htought pinging to ALL pinged only people who already reponded to you?
I can't blame him for leaving. He put more on the line than most of us and invested more time than most of us. He certainly expressed more passion than most of us (not a bad thing). He had trolls appearing out of no where with the mission of shooting him down. Of late, most of the threads have been about grievances with Polarik rather than the substance of what he posted.
Our loss is his family's gain. Surely he will sneak a peak every now and again and if he does post again under any freeper name I would be glad to read whatever he has to say.
FR can be habit forming. My wife also thinks I spend too much time on the computer. But I hope you’ll come back occasionally if developments call for it. Also, I hope you’ll reconsider using the name Polarik again, if you do.
In the meantime, the best to you and your family, and thanks for all your good work.
FReep at work, that way you can spend more time with the family... one way or another...
Get back here, sit down, and behave.
Thanks for all of your hard and great work.
Please do all of us and you a favor.
Take a Sabbatical, recharge your batteries and come back later as an advisor where appropriate.
You have done a great job for Free Republic and America.
You did, OBVIOUSLY mean that you "can prove that the actual document that Obama has dated 2007 isn’t a legitimate document", didn't you???
One cannot prove that a document is genuine from an image, but one CAN prove that the document is FAKE.
Remember the bazillions of dollars in bearer bonds being smuggled from Switzerland to Italy earlier this year? The Fed was able to unquestionably determine that they were fake from a couple low rez faxes.
Genuine Kennedy era documents simply could not have images of the Space Shuttle.
An NO known genuine Hawaiian BC has the border shown of the FactChuck "document".
No unaltered image of a known good document has a whole host of artifacts Polarik noted on the FactChuck "document".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.