Obama’s Science Czar Said a Born Baby ‘Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being’

cybercastnewsservice.org ^ | 7-28-09 | Terence P. Jeffrey

[Texas Eagle]

Obama’s Science Czar Said a Born Baby ‘Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being’ Tuesday, July 28, 2009 By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief

(CNSNews.com) - President Obama’s top science adviser said in a book he co-authored in 1973 that a newborn child “will ultimately develop into a human being” if he or she is properly fed and socialized.

“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,” John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, wrote in “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.”

[oyez]

To bad Holdren didn’t develop in to a human being.

[BigCinBigD]

We pay for this type of insight.

[karatemom]

Holy fetal development, Batman. Is he aware this does not fit the agenda??

[EGPWS]

President Obama’s top science adviser said in a book he co-authored in 1973 that a newborn child “will ultimately develop into a human being” if he or she is properly fed and socialized.

Socialized?

One is an animal until made an elitist apparently.

Good luck with St. Peter you disgrace of a human being.

[Mogollon]

Here is a nice description of this idiot (sounds like the reincarnation of Joseph Mengele):

John P. Holdren

[FlingWingFlyer]

Where does Obama find this scum? Is this the kind of crap they teach at HA-vid? Or did this jackass figure this out all by himself?

[Texas Eagle]

One is an animal until made an elitist apparently.

That is a brain twister. Leftist elitist snobs love animals. To them, animals have more rights than humans.

[laweeks]

“Obama’s Science Czar Said a Born Baby ‘Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being’ “

So, this reasoning will allow Obama and his minions to continue to murder newborns if they’re “accidentally” born during a botched abortion. Good thinking . . . Can you imagine: Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being!”

Then what the hell is it before this so-called development? What are we . . . Nazis?

[Texas Eagle]

Where does Obama find this scum?

Birds of a feather.

[Paved Paradise]

Exactly.

[Texas Eagle]

What are we . . . Nazis?

By proxy.

[Yaelle]

Waiting for any of the current administration to reach that potential.

[Texas Eagle]

Waiting for any of the current administration to reach that potential.

That's going to be a lo-o-o-o-o-o-o-ong wait.

[Constitutional Patriot]

“What are we . . . Nazis?”

We’re not — they are.

[My hearts in London - Everett]

The "properly socialized" is the truly scary part. I think we may be what they consider to be their improperly socialized agitators.

[Texas Eagle]

I think we may be what they consider to be their improperly socialized agitators.

Heh, heh. Ya think? And what do you think they will do to us if we are deemed "improperly socialized"?

[My hearts in London - Everett]

I hear they have some cozy little vacation “camps” waiting for us!

[Texas Eagle]

I hear they have some cozy little vacation “camps” waiting for us!

Oh, goody. I hope they some of those toasty "tanning room" thingies. I got dibs.

[RatRipper]

That point of view begs the question:

“At what point AFTER birth does the mass of tissue become a human being?”

AND

“Is it OK terminate the life of that mass of tissue before it becomes a human being?”

I didn’t know you could teach a mass of tissue to read, speak and send them to Harvard to be “educated”.