Posted on 07/13/2009 8:48:39 PM PDT by FARS
Obama eligibility case will be heard on the merits !! Please distribute everywhere.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter reportedly said the following: 1. There will be a trial. 2. It will be heard on the merits. 3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues. 4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority. 5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC. 6. Judge stated that if Obama isn't Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...
“...the transcript of today’s hearing...’ WHEN, WHERE available?”
That’s what I was asking about. Given how easily these things are subject to misinterpretation, I really want to see the transcript. Hopefully, Dr. Taitz will have it up on her website when it becomes available. In the meanwhile, I just can’t put a lot of stock or enthusiasm into these reports.
I had a thought, what if the birth certificate says “father unknown” Wouldn’t surprise me considering the time of birth, a black man fathering a white young girl in such racial times.
The question is can Orley get the issue of his father being Kenyan injected to the hearing and will they determine what a “natural born citizen” is.
If they hold to senate resolutions on McCain then Obama is sunk.
This judge is going to be under some serious pressure. I hope that the US Marshals assign him a detail for protection as well.
I wasn't trying to imply that you were lazy. Sorry that you took it that way. A lot gets lost in the translation when you put something in writing as opposed to saying it.
absolutely.
It had to be tested in a state court first to have standing.
>Who will remove Obama if he can’t prove his birth as an American citizen? He would have to be impeached, something the RATS would never do.<
No the congress won’t have any choice if it is against him.
the judge can order his removal from office.
Of course if it is ruled against him, they will appeal.
Eventually ending up in the US Supreme Court .. Sotomayer may get her big chance to repay Obama.
But if it goes against him, then the US Marshalls would remove him from office and the Military would be ordered to not accept him as the CIC by the court.
Congress would have nothing to do with that part. Though they may attempt to try him for treason.
He would step down before it got that nasty though. If the winds blow against him, expect him to get “gravely ill” and be unable to fulfill his duties as CIC.
I doubt that it will happen, would love to see it, but somehow I doubt it highly and am not getting my hopes up on it.
I haven’t seen a lot of justice done with this administration in the WH and don’t expect he hasn’t prepared for one State Judge who may not be able to be bought off or intimidated by his office.
He must have a contingency plan. he is evil, but brilliant.
Agree 100%!
>That’s what I think....he may be born in Hawaii but there’s something on the document he doesn’t want us to see.<
His lawyers said that it would be embarrassing for him which is why he has fought it.
Nothing more
US Marshall’s enforce the court order.
Military would be directed by the court not to obey him.
..and you know this, how?
What bona fides did he present to prove his citizenship when he ran for the House or the Senate? Had he shown any, they would be in play now....but there are none.
just askin'
Should Obama refuse to step down, the USSC cold ask the US Army to remove him...and then we’d be just like Honduras:)
Our courts use the US Marshals to enforce their rulings.
the military would be directed by the court not to adhere to him as the CIC
It wouldn’t surprise me if the Clinton’s didn’t come forth to “help” set the record straight. Of course, it would need to be in their best interest to do so....
I’m getting giddy over this LOL.
I have a TINGLE UP MY LEG FOR GODS SAKE!
But imagine the backlash if he leaves.
Hunker down for the race war.
People will go nuts saying he was framed.
that he is not constitutionally eligible to serve. it is the keys case.
She will be asking for “for the release of his vital records”
she hopes to prove that he is not a natural born citizen as required
>If it is, I pray that the TRUTH about the issue come out, one way or another. While thinking people suspect he is not really a natural born citizen, Obama has only himself to blame for such doubt if he really is. Why does he resist coming clean if he is actually clean?<
the funniest thing is he never claimed to be a natural born citizen.
he only said he was a “native citizen” on his fight the smears web site
Nice to know that some folks are still big dreamers...
I'm not convinced there is enough backbone left in this country to see that happen.
Our typical ammo “low water mark” is 5k rounds. If they want to start a race war, our reply will likely be something on the order of “get some”.
>Well, the 57, uhm 50 Secretaries of State are charged with vetting the candidate.
If they did not bother discerning whether 0 met Natural Born Citizen, and discovery is made that he is NOT NBC, then suit could be made that all 50 states election certifications are null and void. No?<
They may not have to do that. If she secures his records from birth, schools, passports and selective service it is done.
If she loses she has “some” ground to open it back up in the states. If she wins, it will probably be appealed.
Unless he knows he will lose in which case he will get sick or something and have to resign quietly.
You are correct. No judge would make such prejudicial comments, especially from the bench, in open court and on the record, ever. To say that such comments would be the foundation upon which an appeal could be built, would be a profound understatement.
Secondly, the counselor is making a serious mistake characterizing (or probably mischaracterizing is more appropriate) the bench's comments so publicly. It's my experience that judges don't like to be misquoted or mischaracterized.
Reading the other accounts of the motion hearing, to me, it sounds like this attorney's procedural missteps probably should have cost her the case yesterday. But, the bench, in what could only be described as a very generous ruling, is giving plaintiff's counsel an opportunity to correct her paperwork before he rules on the motion.
I would like to read the transcript of the hearing before making final judgment, but it appears that this attorney is in a little over her head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.