Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Pets, Owners, There's No Rest (Pet Cemetery Sold; Come Dig Up Your Pet!)
JSOnline ^ | July 10, 2009 | Jim Stingl

Posted on 07/10/2009 1:08:50 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

When I last wrote about Thistlerose Pet Cemetery and Crematory in 2008, the owners and their lawyer were promising the so-called final resting grounds would not be disturbed, even though the property in Greendale was for sale.

Well, forget all that. Get the shovels back out.

In a notice displayed at Thistlerose, they're already referring to it as the "former" cemetery. The anticipated closing date for the sale is July 30.

"You have until July 24, 2009, to arrange for the removal of the remains of your pet and any memorial marker. If the remains and any marker are not removed by that date, they will be deemed to have been abandoned and will be removed, and not preserved, by the new owner," the notice says.

And guess who gets stuck paying for that removal?

I stopped at Thistlerose on Thursday and found perhaps half a dozen disturbed graves. One empty hole was flanked on either side by stones reading "Lady, forever in our hearts" and "Spanky, our boy, the chief. He owned us."

Thistlerose is best known as the burial spot of a dog owned by actress Jayne Mansfield. The Chihuahua named Gallina died in 1964 while Mansfield was in Milwaukee performing in a play.

The bronze marker has been removed by the cemetery owners to protect it from souvenir-seekers. No one from the late actress' family has come forward to claim the remains.

The cemetery owners' new lawyer, Thomas Glowacki of Madison, said someone over-promised last year when vowing the graves would never be disturbed. The plan then was to divide the parcel into two pieces and sell the cemetery portion to someone willing to maintain it.

Don't bother looking up what state statutes say about closing a pet cemetery. There isn't any such law, Glowacki said. He looked.

I'm picturing bulldozers in the coming weeks, and it ain't pretty.

"I'm guessing the same," said Re/Max agent Glenn Shong, who was involved in the sale. Both he and Glowacki said the buyer wanted to remain anonymous at the moment, and they would not say what is planned for the 1.8-acre parcel on the corner of S. 68th St. and W. Loomis Road.

"They're going to do something other than what's there," Shong said.

What's been there for the past half-century: a kennel operation, along with the pet cemetery and crematory, all run lovingly if loosely by Eleanor Jolly. She died in February 2008, and her descendants aren't interested in the business.

Suzanne Jenkin, Jolly's granddaughter, whose name is on the notice, wouldn't talk to me. Hey, I'm just trying to get the word out to dig now or never.

Jolly kept sketchy records of the operation in spiral notebooks, so efforts by Glowacki to send notices to cemetery customers from over the years have been hit-and-miss.

"Obviously, no one feels good about this," Glowacki said. "I have three cats in my backyard, so I'm not insensitive to this."

I've heard estimates that as many as 500 dogs and cats are buried at Thistlerose, along with one pet chicken. Glowacki said he thought it was closer to 250.

Barb Schumann of Greenfield paid $236.60 to bury her dachshund, Adolphe, at Thistlerose in 1973. Her late brother's dog, Susie, also was buried there.

Schumann was driving by recently and spotted the posted notices. She never received one in the mail.

With help from a friend who had experience exhuming human bodies for the police in New York, she dug up both graves last week and took the remains to her vet to be cremated. Someday, she's going to have the ashes of all her pets commingled with her own. "We're all going together," she said.

She's not angry, but she would never again pay to have an animal buried at a pet cemetery. What assurance is there that it would stay in business?

"I worried about it back then, and sure as hell, it happened," she said.

Rosemary Andrea's dog, Joy, died in 2004 and was one of the last burials at Thistlerose. After she received the closing notice, she wrote to Glowacki and told him she paid Jolly $1,420 to bury Joy.

"I believe Mrs. Jolly's heirs are responsible for relocating the animals at their expense before final settlement is made," the Menomonee Falls woman wrote on June 20. There was no reply.

Now, she's not sure what to do for her beloved German shepherd-and-collie mix. "She was a real loving dog. Everybody loved her," she said.

Jim Gerke of Milwaukee said his family has two dogs at Thistlerose. He might wind up moving them to his yard.

"I don't want to have them dumped in the garbage someplace," Gerke said. "We've been fooled. You don't rent a grave. You figure it's going to be there."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: cemetery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: RichInOC
Poor old Fred just doesn't look right without a bolt in his neck.

I always thought it was sad that he ended up in an unmarked grave.


21 posted on 07/10/2009 2:15:43 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Even when he did “My Cousin Vinny”?


22 posted on 07/10/2009 2:18:08 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
Yeah. He's like Leonard Nimoy.


23 posted on 07/10/2009 2:20:52 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

24 posted on 07/10/2009 2:23:23 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

25 posted on 07/10/2009 2:26:27 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Crazy is the new sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Not on the same level as the Chi-Town graveyard ghoul story.


26 posted on 07/10/2009 2:27:46 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

ROTFLMAO!


27 posted on 07/10/2009 2:29:57 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag

See you in Heaven. Don’t trip over the rocks.


28 posted on 07/10/2009 2:33:54 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Crazy is the new sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

While I could be aggrieved with golf courses, I can put them in perspective with a greater metropolitan area. While they serve only one direct function, they also provide aesthetic value as well as reduce heat islands and dust, some noise reduction, and some oasis for wild animals.

Living in the southwest does make you more aware of water use, but that is relative as well. Agriculture and industry make good use of most public water, so only blatant misuse, like multiple shallow artificial lakes in residential areas, is really abusive.

Golf courses are also easy to covert to other uses, as they are just a “surface” use.


29 posted on 07/10/2009 3:07:54 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

It TOOK long enough for a ‘Pet Cemetery’ post, LOL! We’re slippin’!


30 posted on 07/10/2009 4:17:45 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Really? Why?


31 posted on 07/10/2009 4:18:58 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

LOL! :)


32 posted on 07/10/2009 4:19:52 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I understand stuffing a former pet, but have no idea why someone would bury their pet in a cemetery.

Yeah, bury it on your property, but to actually pay money for a burial plot ???

33 posted on 07/10/2009 4:27:23 PM PDT by Popman (Joe Biden REALLY can't be Vice President, can he ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Stuffed domestic animals creep me out. Deer or fish or other wild trophy animals don’t bother me.


34 posted on 07/10/2009 4:31:57 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Stuffed domestic animals creep me out.

I'm just thinking if you are going to spend money on a plot, you might as well spent that money on stuffing "fluffy" and be able to pet their heads every morning

Heck, you don't even have to feed or walk them

35 posted on 07/10/2009 4:36:57 PM PDT by Popman (Joe Biden REALLY can't be Vice President, can he ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

If you don’t get it, I can’t explain it.


36 posted on 07/10/2009 5:06:57 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

I’m not here to make anyone believe otherwise. Folks live by example and engage those who are willing to consider these things. Cheers!


37 posted on 07/10/2009 7:26:58 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

This comes down to contract law. What were the terms on the contract signed when they buried their pets?


38 posted on 07/10/2009 7:37:25 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Personally, I always thought cemeteries should double as golf courses. (I'm talking cemeteries for humans as well). After all, cemeteries are such as waste of good land. And land should be for the living.

Well turning them into golf courses kills two birds with one stone. Dead people get to stay buried while living people get extra places to get in some golf.

Dead people down below...living people up above. Everybody is a winner!

Also, the tombstones could double as hazards for the golfers up above. Make the game a little more challenging.

39 posted on 07/11/2009 4:49:31 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 69 days away from outliving Judy Garland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

We could also bury a bunch of animals next to airport runways.


40 posted on 07/22/2009 8:54:46 AM PDT by Billywilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson