Posted on 07/09/2009 5:56:43 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
Martin cites an article from the Internet ezine www.WorldNetDaily.com that collects conflicting claims about the actual hospital where Barack Obama was born. "Where's the truth?" asks Martin? "Does anyone in Hawai'i care about the truth? Or don’t they care that Hawai'i is increasingly looking like Obama's own 'gangster republic?'" WND.com has carried new concerns about media "swapping" of Obama's birth location, see: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103465 [Best document view is usually at www.ContrarianCommentary.com]
ANDY MARTIN Petitioner Pro Se
NATIONAL LITIGATION CENTER Post Office Box 1851 New York, NY 10150-1851 Toll-free tel. (866) 70-6-2639 Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639 E-mail: AndyMart20@aol.com (text only)
Additional courtesy copy requested to:
ANDY MARTIN REGIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT 30 E. Huron Street, Suite 4406 Chicago, IL 60611-4723
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI’I
SUPREME COURT DOCKET NUMBER:
ANDY MARTIN,
Petitioner,
v.
HON. LINDA LINGLE, in her official capacity as Governor; DR. CHIYOME FUKINO, in her official capacity as Director of the Department of Health, HON. BERT AYABE, in his official capacity as Circuit Judge,
Respondents.
___
REQUEST TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE IN CONNECTION WITH APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
The question of where Barack Obama was born continues to be clouded and occluded. As the accompanying certiorari papers were being prepared, yet another article crossed Petitioner's desk with conflicting documentation (see attached): wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103306. Whether the article in question is accurate, vel non, is impossible to determine because the article contains conflicting claims emanating from the Obama family itself as well as other reputable sources. Petitioner has never made any claims about Obama's origins, because he has accepted at face value the claims of Hawai'i officials that there is an actual, original, typewritten 1961 birth certificate. He has merely sought access to an indisputably archival, historical record of the American presidency. Where conflicts in the public records and conflicting claims exist about the highest elected official in the United States, a court should be particularly wary in covering up the original document that can answer the conflicting claims with reasonable finality. When a court or a judicial system aids and abets in a cover-up of historical truth, ultimately the court itself will become the victim of its own machinations. No reasonable person could claim that Hawaii's "secrecy" statutes for birth information were intended to conceal archival, historical material about the American presidency. This Court should take decisive action before the Court itself becomes a part of a questionable pattern of behavior concerning a document that is obviously relevant to American history. Petitioner seeks only the facts; he is dedicated solely to the truth. Nothing more. And nothing less. CONCLUSION Most respectfully, Petitioner asks that this Court judicially notice the attached article, not for the truth of the contents of the attached report—since the article itself contains conflicting claims—but for the fact that the question of the Hawai'i birth certificate is taking on greater, not diminished, significance for a growing segment of the American people. Given Hawaii's historical commitment to open records and open history, as exemplified by the Uniform Information Procedures Act and the prior decision of this Court, the time is long past when the historical truth about the birth certificate should be revealed by ordering the release of the archived document. No one—not a public official, not a judicial officer—should be allowed to play fast and loose with the historical truths of the American people.
DATED: July 8, 2009
New York, NY Respectfully submitted,
ANDY MARTIN Petitioner Pro se
NATIONAL LITIGATION CENTER P. O. Box 1851 New York, NY 10150-1851 Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639 Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639 E-mail: AndyMart20@aol.com (text only)
Additional courtesy copy requested to:
ANDY MARTIN
REGIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT 30 E. Huron Street, Suite 4406 Chicago, IL 60611-4723
SERVICE OF NOTICES IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED BY FAX OR E-MAIL
Additional e-mail address available upon request
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify I have served the Hawai'i Attorney General by fax to (808) 587-3077 and the Hon. Bert I. Ayabe by fax to (808) 539-4108 on July 8, 2009.
ANDY MARTIN
Irrelevant. You should never believe something because you have no evidence that it is true. There is no evidence that Obama was a foreign student at Occidental.
And who do you think will remove him ?
There is no evidence Obama was an American student at Occidental. Don’t believe he was unless you have evidence.
I didn’t say he was an American student. I said there was no evidence that he was a foreign student.
Don’t believe things based on a lack of evidence
SCOTUS being presented with overwhelming evidence......
You wrote- “And who do you think will remove him ?”
I’d like to see that. Of course, by that reckoning, the election itself should be nullified. This, of course, is without precedence, since the usual procedure would be via impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate (but the Dem majorities would never do that under any circumstances, even if there was film of him being born in that Kenyan hospital).
NO EVIDENCE??? Excuse me. I own a copy of his book, “Dreams From My Father.” Check this out.
In his first memoir, “Dreams,” Obama included a description of black student life at Occidental College in Los Angeles.
“There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”
He added: “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.”
Much of our brief against PRESENT (that is a president without ID) Obama comes from his very own words!!!!
But you are certainly correct in believing their is no official DOCUMENTARY evidence supporting his attendance at Occidental. He simply refuses to release it.
There is no evidence to suggest he was a foreign student. The only reason people believe it is because some guy said it.
Many people don’t realize that Obama’s alleged forged COLB and forged Selective Service documents could result in felonies.
My personal opinion, SCOTUS is too scared to touch any of those issues and to remove him. The fact that he refused to provide actual evidence (as McCain did, having been born in the then-American territory of the Canal Zone) and was still sworn-in as President makes the precedent that the Constitution can be willfully violated. By that, Ah-nold out in CA could “claim” he was born in the U.S. and run for President and there’d be nothing to stop him. Real nice that SCOTUS itself won’t protect and defend the Constitution.
I agree that they are past due on acting against Obama not being a natural born citizen (until he provides proof). None-the-less, the overwhelming evidence will eventually be out for everyone to see and they will have no alternative but to remove Obama from office.
There is no evidence that he qualifies as a natural born citizen either. He admits that he was governed at birth by the British immigration and naturalization act of 1948 on his now scrubbed Fight the Smears web site due to the fact that his father was a Kenyan citizen as well as British due to that act. Even if you accept that fact which he is admitting to, and how can natural born citizen be governed by another nation citizenship laws? Your natural born citizenship status is your status at birth, not when you decide to run for president.
Three Supreme Court cases have dealt peripherally with the definition of natural born citizen, Kim Wong Ark vs US, Perkins vs Elg, and Minor vs Happersett. In all three the justices said that a natural born citizen had two United States citizen parents and had to be born on United States soil.
Since Obama is such an inveterate liar, we need his birth certificate to legally establish whether or not Barack Obama senior is in fact his legal father at his birth. It is possible, even though I don’t put much stock in this possibility, that the natural born citizen Frank Marshall Davis could be his father. If that admittedly remote possibility is true, and he was born in Hawaii, then our strongest case against him is for electoral and campaign fraud and forgery. We need the BC to establish a base.
There is no evidence that he qualifies as a natural born citizen either. He admits that he was governed at birth by the British immigration and naturalization act of 1948 on his now scrubbed Fight the Smears web site due to the fact that his father was a Kenyan citizen as well as British due to that act. Even if you accept that fact which he is admitting to, and how can natural born citizen be governed by another nation citizenship laws? Your natural born citizenship status is your status at birth, not when you decide to run for president.
Three Supreme Court cases have dealt peripherally with the definition of natural born citizen, Kim Wong Ark vs US, Perkins vs Elg, and Minor vs Happersett. In all three the justices said that a natural born citizen had two United States citizen parents and had to be born on United States soil.
Since Obama is such an inveterate liar, we need his birth certificate to legally establish whether or not Barack Obama senior is in fact his legal father at his birth. It is possible, even though I don’t put much stock in this possibility, that the natural born citizen Frank Marshall Davis could be his father. If that admittedly remote possibility is true, and he was born in Hawaii, then our strongest case against him is for electoral and campaign fraud and forgery. We need the BC to establish a base.
Interesting!
You wrote-
“Since Obama is such an inveterate liar, we need his birth certificate to legally establish whether or not Barack Obama senior is in fact his legal father at his birth. It is possible, even though I don’t put much stock in this possibility, that the natural born citizen Frank Marshall Davis could be his father. If that admittedly remote possibility is true, and he was born in Hawaii, then our strongest case against him is for electoral and campaign fraud and forgery. We need the BC to establish a base.”
They got burned bad by the Democrat media last time they stopped Democrats from stealing the Bush election. The Democrats played the part of being jipped out of the election by “Republicans” on the court.
You are right. They don’t want to go through even worse by nailing the Democrats placing an illegal president in office and removing him.
But...they have to. Democrats have no respect for the rule of law - only power by whatever means.
There is a lack of evidence he was an American student at Occidental.
I think that the birth certificate contains something highly significant and damaging to Zero. However, for the life of me I can’t figure out how NOTHING has been leaked about his missing years and the BC. You’d think that people with that kind of juicy information would be squealing like pigs. Obviously someone(s) other than Zero knows what’s in all those documents. How have they remained quiet—and LOYAL—this long?
Good point! One good answer might be that all the juicy info would be coming from Kenya. The doctors, nurses, etc. are all in Kenya. Grandmother did indicate that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya.
You wrote- “I think that the birth certificate contains something highly significant and damaging to Zero. However, for the life of me I can’t figure out how NOTHING has been leaked about his missing years and the BC. You’d think that people with that kind of juicy information would be squealing like pigs. Obviously someone(s) other than Zero knows what’s in all those documents. How have they remained quiet—and LOYAL—this long?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.