Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Director: Megan Fox 'Says Some Very Ridiculous Things'
US Magazine ^ | 070109

Posted on 07/02/2009 11:15:32 PM PDT by Artemis Webb

Megan Fox slammed "Transformers" director Michael Bay for focusing more on special effects than acting, but he doesn't mind.

"Well, that's Megan Fox for you," Bay tell the Wall Street Journal. "She says some very ridiculous things because she's 23 years old and she still has a lot of growing to do.

"You roll your eyes when you see statements like that and think, 'Okay Megan, you can do whatever you want. I got it,'" he goes on.

Fox told Entertainment Weekly: "I mean, I can't s--- on this movie because it did give me a career and open all these doors for me. But I don't want to blow smoke up people's a--. People are well aware that this is not a movie about acting."

Bay says he "100 percent disagrees" with Fox.

"Nick Cage wasn't a big actor when I cast him, nor was Ben Affleck before I put him in 'Armageddon.' Shia LaBeouf wasn't a big movie star before he did 'Transformers' -- and then he exploded. Not to mention Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, from 'Bad Boys'," he points out.

Bay thinks Fox could be a little more grateful, though.

"Nobody in the world knew about Megan Fox until I found her and put her in Transformers," he says. "I like to think that I've had some luck in building actors' careers with my films."

(Excerpt) Read more at movies.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
It's a damn good thing for Megan Fox the movie isn't about acting.
1 posted on 07/02/2009 11:15:33 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Everyone knows Michael Bay’s formula for a good movie is, special effects, multiple closeups, quick cuts, multiple pans, lots of slow motion, and tons of explosions, you must also throw in a monster ballad.


2 posted on 07/02/2009 11:20:25 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

no no

This is “Pile on Megan Fox Thread”.
The “Pile on Michael Bay Thread” is tomorrow. :)


3 posted on 07/02/2009 11:24:59 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

it’s what folks want

America is now fat Wal Mart shopping George Romero zombies but they aren’t dead yet

not much appetite for David Mamet or Pedro Aldomovar..series fare


4 posted on 07/02/2009 11:28:02 PM PDT by wardaddy (Proudly Anti-Abortion, not and will never be Pro-Life...........Sarah Palin, there is no substitute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I may be young, but I prefer movies that have some depth and character development. I find myself watching movies from the 70s on back more often than any newer stuff. A movie like the Great Escape or Patton could never be made today as it would be seen as boring.


5 posted on 07/02/2009 11:32:26 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LukeL
"Everyone knows Michael Bay’s formula for a good movie is, special effects, multiple closeups, quick cuts, multiple pans, lots of slow motion, and tons of explosions, you must also throw in a monster ballad."

And to that I so, "Who cares?". Sure, Bay's films are predictable, cheesy, well-packaged and more than a little formulaic. But, they're entertaining as hell.

In today's atmosphere of actors, directors and producer - especially the last two - bludgeoning their audiences to the point of unconsciousness with their thinly-veiled political narratives and perspectives, I appreciate Bay's good 'ole fashioned big-screen escapism.

And, if Megan Fox would like, she can take her tattooed behind to the indie film world, where only the 3,000 people that actually watch those movies (in West Hollywood and the East Village) can appreciate her depth and dimension as an accomplished actress. Michael Bay can find another dime-a-dozen hotties to cast in his next $300 million epic.

6 posted on 07/02/2009 11:34:32 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (Palin/Petraeus in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

I would honestly be surprised if Fox could spell “acting”.


7 posted on 07/02/2009 11:37:22 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

I like serious movies too but I take my younguns to big movies....America’s ignorant eat that crap up

and Bay and Bruckheimer know that


8 posted on 07/02/2009 11:38:05 PM PDT by wardaddy (Proudly Anti-Abortion, not and will never be Pro-Life...........Sarah Palin, there is no substitute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Megan Fox is trying to burn bridges which is not good. Michael Bay was correct: a little gratitude please... you walking pair of tits with an IQ of a doorknob.


9 posted on 07/02/2009 11:40:19 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Gotta agree with Bay. If she wasn’t cast in Transformers she’d probably be stuck doing bikini (or less) ‘modeling’ for cash. Least this way she can do both.


10 posted on 07/02/2009 11:40:46 PM PDT by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
People can complain about Bay's movies - but both Transformer movies were very patriotic.

Bay is pretty clever - the best scenes in both movies involve fights with the badbots in desert locales in the Middle East. I don't think that was an accident. And I don't think the success of both movies has been an accident either - because they happen to be practically the only movies that have come out of Hollywood since 9/11 that have taken an unabashedly favorable stance on the U.S. military.

It also helps that the comedic relief in both movies have been federal bureaucrats

11 posted on 07/02/2009 11:41:31 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
All I have to say is Armageddon and Pearl Harbor. You can have great pointless movies, but the way Michael Bay does it is annoying. He is like M Night Shyamalan, their method was good at first, but became predictable after their 3rd movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pM8PrqY5Rg&feature=related

12 posted on 07/02/2009 11:42:07 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

Thats what gets me about this film. No characters. The two main ones really suck. Shia Labeouf just seems to scream and ad lib throughout the whole film.

If it was the script Shia was following, then hang the screen writer(s).

The only one I cared for was John Turturro, Sector 7 Agent Simmons. Turturro is a better actor then the role he played.

I’ll take the older films as well.


13 posted on 07/02/2009 11:49:05 PM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

From everything I’ve seen and heard out of this idiot, she’s a spoiled brat airhead. A mind is a terrible thing to waste but Megan doesn’t mind. She hasn’t got one.


14 posted on 07/03/2009 12:03:02 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Bay is a capitalist, and I’m sure that drives Megan Fox nuts.


15 posted on 07/03/2009 12:47:11 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

I’m pretty sure she is NOT GUILTY of anything


16 posted on 07/03/2009 1:06:03 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

What is the point of a Megan Fox thread without pictures? Surely we aren’t interested in what she says?


17 posted on 07/03/2009 1:10:03 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb; All

18 posted on 07/03/2009 1:48:22 AM PDT by backhoe (All across America, the Lights are going out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

True and that’s been enjoyable. But Revenge of the Fallen was so disjointed though I could barely watch it.

Bay may not have the depth but he usually has tight movies and this one wasn’t. Felt like I was watching the latest Star Wars. Sad part was all he needed to do was cut out about 20 minutes.


19 posted on 07/03/2009 2:17:47 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. 2010 awaits.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Since nobody else seems to be following the rule that I'm sure must exist somewhere about Megan Fox:


20 posted on 07/03/2009 2:19:18 AM PDT by RightFighter (Sarah Palin - we love you and can't wait to see you again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson