Skip to comments.
New Pattern Found in Prime Numbers
PhysOrg.com ^
| May 8th, 2009
| Lisa Zyga
Posted on 05/10/2009 5:17:09 PM PDT by decimon
In a recent study, Bartolo Luque and Lucas Lacasa of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid in Spain have discovered a new pattern in primes that has surprisingly gone unnoticed until now. They found that the distribution of the leading digit in the prime number sequence can be described by a generalization of Benfords law. In addition, this same pattern also appears in another number sequence, that of the leading digits of nontrivial Riemann zeta zeros, which is known to be related to the distribution of primes. Besides providing insight into the nature of primes, the finding could also have applications in areas such as fraud detection and stock market analysis.
(Excerpt) Read more at physorg.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: math; mathematics; numbers; pattern; patterns; prime; primenumbers; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: PapaBear3625; Squantos
The NSA’s old motto used to be “ten years ahead of the state of the art.”
They probably knew this and more ten years ago.
If they have been breaking PGP, they sure wouldn’t announce that fact.
41
posted on
05/10/2009 7:37:33 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
("Foreign Enemies And Traitors" is being shipped from the printer.)
To: buckrodgers
42
posted on
05/10/2009 7:40:04 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Travis McGee; hiredhand
Agree.......I would go as far as 20 years ahead in tech and such.
43
posted on
05/10/2009 7:55:13 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: Travis McGee
“(Just kidding. I have no idea what they are talking about.)
“
LOL! Sometimes my wife looks at me like a curious dog hearing a high pitched whistle.
44
posted on
05/10/2009 7:55:29 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
To: stripes1776
If now there is some algorithm that can predict where those primes exist, them it would be possible to use that algorithm to break the public key. Good-bye security.I am mathematically challenged but if it can be used to break a current key, could not the decoders go back to previous messages and break them also? If so, lots of new worriesd in the intelligence community.
45
posted on
05/10/2009 7:56:22 PM PDT
by
Oatka
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: The_Reader_David
46
posted on
05/10/2009 8:19:07 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Oatka
I am mathematically challenged but if it can be used to break a current key, could not the decoders go back to previous messages and break them also? If so, lots of new worriesd in the intelligence community.Yes, I think you are correct. If you could use an algorithm to break a key, it would not matter when that key was generated--now, in the past, in the future.
47
posted on
05/10/2009 8:29:50 PM PDT
by
stripes1776
("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
To: decimon
The observed patterns may well impact the security of public key encryption e.g. RSA that depends on the product of two large prime numbers.
48
posted on
05/10/2009 8:32:02 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Oatka
I am mathematically challenged but if it can be used to break a current key, could not the decoders go back to previous messages and break them also? If so, lots of new worries in the intelligence community. The common practice is to use of level of encryption that is unbreakable before the value of the information expires. If a message details troop movements tomorrow morning, but takes a week to crack, that is good enough. Just because you figured out the key for one message, you haven't accomplished much. The keys will be changed before the next message goes out.
49
posted on
05/10/2009 8:36:52 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Oatka
I am mathematically challenged but if it can be used to break a current key, could not the decoders go back to previous messages and break them also? If so, lots of new worriesd in the intelligence community. We were doing that with the Soviets after the second world war.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VENONA
50
posted on
05/10/2009 8:42:24 PM PDT
by
Brellium
("Thou shalt not shilly shally!" Aron Nimzowitsch)
To: ResponseAbility
Pi was a very strange movie. I love the scene where he finds his brain in the subway station.
51
posted on
05/11/2009 3:17:38 AM PDT
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: Brellium
We were doing that with the Soviets after the second world war.Thanks for the link. Interesting stuff.
52
posted on
05/11/2009 7:38:02 AM PDT
by
Oatka
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: Lancey Howard
You, um, care to publish that methodology?
53
posted on
05/11/2009 7:44:42 AM PDT
by
patton
(Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
To: Rapscallion; Lancey Howard
I quit after I worked out the quadrature of the loon, myself.
54
posted on
05/11/2009 7:46:21 AM PDT
by
patton
(Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
To: ViLaLuz
Yea, that’s where he figures out which part of his brain was damaged from looking at the sun for too long.
55
posted on
05/11/2009 8:30:23 AM PDT
by
ResponseAbility
(Government tends to never fix the problems it creates in the first place)
To: TMSuchman
Just goes to show that we can find GOD in the smallest of places.The human mind? lol
56
posted on
05/11/2009 10:26:24 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Cloward-Piven Strategy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson