Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New, Fast-Evolving Rabies Virus Found -- And Spreading
National Geographic ^ | May 4, 2009 | Anne Minard

Posted on 05/05/2009 12:00:56 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Evolving faster than any other new rabies virus on record, a northern-Arizona rabies strain has mutated to become contagious among skunks and now foxes, experts believe.

The strain looks to be spreading fast, commanding attention from disease researchers across the United States.

It's not so unusual for rabid animals to attack people on hiking trails and in driveways, or even in a bar—as happened March 27, when an addled bobcat chased pool players around the billiards table at the Chaparral in Cottonwood.

Nor is it odd that rabid skunks and foxes are testing positive for a contagious rabies strain commonly associated with big brown bats.

What is unusual is that the strain appears to have mutated so that foxes and skunks are now able to pass the virus on to their kin—not just through biting and scratching but through simple socializing, as humans might spread a flu.

Usually the secondary species—in this case, a skunk or fox bitten by a bat—is a dead-end host. The infected animal may become disoriented and even die but is usually unable to spread the virus, except through violent attacks.

(See pictures of infectious animals.)

Skunks have already been proven to be passively transmitting the strain to each other, as documented in a 2006 study in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.

Genetic studies suggest foxes are also spreading the new strain to each other, though the results have not yet been peer reviewed.

Unprecedented Evolution

When a skunk in Flagstaff, Arizona, died of rabies in 2001, wildlife specialists thought it was a "freak accident"—due to a one-off, run-of-the-mill bat bite—said Barbara Worgess, director of the Coconino County Health Department.

Lab tests later showed that the virus had adapted to the skunk physiology and become contagious within the species.

"It shouldn't have been able to pass from skunk to skunk," Worgess said.

Rabies has continued to crop up in skunks for eight years now, despite periodic vaccination campaigns. And so far this year, county officials have documented 14 rabid foxes in the Flagstaff area.

Now laboratory studies at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta appear to confirm that the fox and skunk rabies viruses are mutated forms of the bat strain.

"We can see degrees of relatedness and patterns in their genetic codes," said Charles Rupprecht, chief of the rabies program for the CDC.

This sort of rapid evolution is exactly what worries public health officials when it comes to all manner of viruses. Virologists haven't seen such fast adaptation to a new species in rabies before.

"That's why Flagstaff is such an interesting story worldwide," said David Bergman, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's state director for Arizona.

"We're watching evolution in action on the ground."

Could Rabies Become Contagious in Humans?

The Arizona rabies situation is risky, because the infected species live so close to people.

Flagstaff's sprawl in recent decades has created a perfect opportunity for rabies to mutate into species-hopping forms, the CDC's Rupprecht said.

New-home construction, often in wooded areas, has actually increased habitat and food sources for bats, skunks, and foxes. Skunks live under houses, for example, and as diggers, make themselves at home on golf courses. Bats, meanwhile, are adept at living in attics and under loose shingles.

As more rabies-susceptible animals congregate in the region, more infections can take place. And each infection is an opportunity for the virus to mutate into a more virulent form—literally upping the odds of a new strain developing.

"That's a pattern that we see all over the United States," Rupprecht said. Similar suburban development in the eastern U.S. in the late 1970s, he noted, led to the spread of raccoon rabies from the Canadian border to the Deep South.

The risk of such a virulent strain jumping to people "should be a major concern," said Hinh Ly, a molecular virologist at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, who is not involved in studies of the Arizona outbreak.

But no one is expecting the rabies strain to become a contagious, swine flu-like epidemic among humans.

Flu viruses, for one thing, tend to infect people fast, so "vaccination after exposure would be too late to prevent infection," said Elisabeth Lawaczeck, the Arizona Department of Health Services' public health veterinarian.

Rabies takes its time before going from incubation to infection, so post-exposure rabies vaccinations tend to be effective at stopping the virus. If untreated, though, rabies, which attacks the central nervous system, is often fatal in humans.

What Next?

Rabies cases among animals are expected to increase as the spring and summer mating seasons bring potential pairs and rivals together. (Related: "Bat Rabies Threat Rises With Summer Temperatures.")

Already, Flagstaff has declared a 90-day pet quarantine—all dogs on leashes and all cats indoors—which began in April.

A wildlife vaccination plan could stem the virus's spread.

Local and state officials enacted vaccination programs in northern Arizona in 2001 and 2005 but discontinued each effort after two years without rabies reports—the World Health Organization's standard for declaring an area rabies-free.

Now state vaccination funds have been reallocated, the USDA's Bergman said, and emergency funds are increasingly rare due to the recession.

Adding to the worries, Lawaczeck, the Arizona veterinary official, said she and other public heath officials were "very unsettled" when the first rabid fox reports came in from Flagstaff this year—and not just because of the evolutionary implications for rabies.

"This means a much wider spread of rabies," she said, "because [foxes] travel so much farther."


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Outdoors; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: arizona; rabies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2009 12:00:57 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The cable networks were starting to foam at the mouth thinking about how they were going to keep their audience now that swine flu is fading...


2 posted on 05/05/2009 12:08:03 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This was on CSI last Thursday. Sort of.


3 posted on 05/05/2009 12:09:10 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

4 posted on 05/05/2009 12:13:13 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

5 posted on 05/05/2009 12:13:13 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

Are you aware of this?


6 posted on 05/05/2009 12:14:16 AM PDT by pandoraou812 (elected officials should be required to pass drug, alcohol & dementia testing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

ping FWIW


7 posted on 05/05/2009 12:14:35 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Critter *ping*


8 posted on 05/05/2009 12:20:32 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812
Are you aware of this?

Yes ma'm!
But I thank you for the link (and ping)

This is frightening - bats, coyotes, fox, javelina, raccoons - it has become dangerous to even walk our pets!

9 posted on 05/05/2009 12:24:20 AM PDT by yorkie (Today - smile at a stranger. It may be the only smile that person has been given. It is a blessing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; pandoraou812

Oh, good. I was getting tired of the swine flu.


10 posted on 05/05/2009 12:28:11 AM PDT by TigersEye (Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Cap’n Tripps — at least a more likely version than the “swine flu” aka H1N1 aka a flu strain covered by last year’s type 1 influenca vaccine...


11 posted on 05/05/2009 12:33:55 AM PDT by piytar (Obama = Mugabe wannabe. Wake up America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; GodGunsGuts; grey_whiskers

This whole article must just be made up because evolution is, you know, not real and all...


12 posted on 05/05/2009 12:37:41 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored; GodGunsGuts

Actually, evolution is not real. Mutation is not the same as “Evolution,” this respect to your haughty sarcasm. There has never been any evidence, ever of one species transforming into another. Oh, we have mutation, it occurs among offspring of many, but a species is a set of organisms one that is genetically able to reproduce viable and fertile offspring, and will do so in a given population grouping.

and that is the evolutionists silly little misconception. Mutation never has proven “Evolution.” God created all things after their kind, and they never have leaped from one species to another, although characteristics vary from one individual to its offspring. Grow up and don’t please don’t taunt believers just for a gratification for your own pride. Evolution doesn’t apply to this virus, because viruses are not living anyway, they can be identified as neither living nor non-living, they are not in any of the kingdom’s of life, they are encapsulated genetic material incapable of reproduction.

Bark up another tree please.


13 posted on 05/05/2009 12:55:31 AM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Runaway mutating viruses all over the place! Has someone been messing around?


14 posted on 05/05/2009 1:14:07 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Must be caused by global warming. We better hurry up and implement “carbon taxes” to fight this.


15 posted on 05/05/2009 1:17:40 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

BTTT


16 posted on 05/05/2009 1:42:05 AM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Life is but a big granola bar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235; grey_whiskers
The fundamental mistake that creationists and intelligent design proponents make is the imputation of intention to non-intentional processes.

Sometimes a cigar is just a joke.

17 posted on 05/05/2009 1:45:05 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Wow.

We need nationalized health care right away!


18 posted on 05/05/2009 2:03:55 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
1) Would this be "punctuated equilibrium"?

2) Implications for punctuated equilbrium happening by multiple methods -- e.g. environmentally-driven vs. genetic drift (skunks haven't changed, this one must be random)

3) Corollary implications for "genetic clocks" -- what determines how often an punctuated event happens, how regularly/irregularly, and implications for cladistics and dating of species by genetic similarities.

Haven't seen them discussed in these threads: only a couple of FReepers would be competent to discuss them, and they're not on speaking terms with me :-(

Have an all-day training seminar at work, have to run.

g_w Cheers!

19 posted on 05/05/2009 4:01:45 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
The fundamental mistake that creationists and intelligent design proponents make is the imputation of intention to non-intentional processes.

Fair 'nuff, in its own way, if you arent' begging the question/engaged in circular reasoning.

But as a riposte, the fundamental mistake evolutionists make is assuming any designer gave us the original blueprints and design requirements, acting as an engineer and not an artist, and that there have been no vandals in the workshop.

Their "zeroth order" model of theism contradicts the actual beginning tenets of most monotheic religions. Equal a priori probabilities and Occam's razor and all that, but those are only *meant* to be used when you are entering blind, and wish to minimize false positives. Religion at least *claims* to be revealed (attacking the first point, as some people -- and/or deities and spirits are more trustworthy than others); and the a priori / razor approach gives little confidence in protecting against false negatives.

State of the art of my thinking on it at the moment. (Read my tagline tho'.)

Sometimes a cigar is just a joke.

And sometimes it's an expensive hand-rolled Cuban.

How *does* one go about telling the difference, Monica?

:-P

Cheers!

20 posted on 05/05/2009 4:08:38 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson