Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six Principles from Sun Tzu (Rules for Conservatives)
The Sun Tzu Strategy Site ^ | No date | Mark McNeilly

Posted on 04/19/2009 7:11:15 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion

The Six Principles from Sun Tzu and the Art of Modern Warfare

“The United States faces many potential adversaries, both in the form of nation states and terrorist organizations. Each day, as technology progresses, the ability of these adversaries to inflict harm on the U.S. military units, national infrastructure, or civilians increases.” (p187)

So writes Mark McNeilly in chapter seven, “Ancient Principles for Future Battlefields,” of his new book, Sun Tzu and the Art of Modern Warfare.

http://www.suntzu1.com/content/sun_tzu_and_the_art_of_modern_warfare/

Using historical examples that span the centuries, McNeilly applies the six principles he developed from Sun Tzu's classic treatise on strategy, The Art of War, to help the reader understand this ancient wisdom's relevance to modern warfare. The examples cover the range and breadth of warfare. From terrorist attacks on the US to counter-terrorist actions such as the Israeli raid on Entebbe to rescue hijacked passengers. From the use of guerillas and irregular forces in Viet Nam and the American revolution to full-scale conventional warfare in both world wars, the Persian Gulf war, and others.

McNeilly's six principles are: 1. Win All Without Fighting: Achieving the Objective Without Destroying It 2. Avoid Strength, Attack Weakness: Striking Where the Enemy is Most Vulnerable 3. Deception and Foreknowledge: Winning the Information War 4. Speed and Preparation: Moving Swiftly to Overcome Resistance 5. Shaping the Enemy: Preparing the Battlefield 6. Character-Based Leadership: Leading by Example

The first principle, Win All Without Fighting: Achieving the Objective Without Destroying It, discusses the goal of strategy (covered in Chapter 1). Many city-states, countries, and empires have been built by leaders who leveraged their nation's unique history, geography, and assets to control that state's environment and sphere of influence. Thus, these leaders were able to ensure their states' ability to survive, become stable, expand, dominate their neighbors, and ultimately prosper for hundreds of years.

The Roman Empire grew from a small area surrounding Rome to extend from Britain to the Black Sea to Egypt to what would in the future be known as Gibraltar. It lasted over five hundred years. The Mongol Empire began with a single nomadic tribe in central Asia but grew to rule lands from China to India to Europe. And, of course, the sun never set on the British Empire for several centuries.

The goal of all these empires has been, like a living organism, to first survive, then to prosper. Today that goal remains for all countries, first to survive as an entity, and then to become prosperous.

If the goal of a country is to survive and prosper, then what is the goal of its strategy? Sun Tzu offers this advice:

Your aim must be to take All-under-Heaven intact. Thus your troops are not worn out and your gains will be complete. This is the art of offensive strategy.

The second principle is an important tenet of this philosophy: avoid strength, attack weakness. This principle discusses how to win All-under-Heaven intact.

Now an army may be likened to water, for just as flowing water avoids the heights and hastens to the lowlands, so an army avoids strength and strikes weakness.

Although many generals prefer to attack each other head-on, this approach is very costly. As discussed earlier, wars of attrition can last for months and even years, leaving both sides in a weakened state. Instead, using the method of avoiding strength and attacking weakness maximizes one's gains while minimizing the use of the nation's resources. This, by definition, increases prosperity. This principle is discussed in detail in Chapter 2, Avoid Strength, Attack Weakness: Striking Where The Enemy Is Most Vulnerable.

To find and exploit an enemy's weakness requires a deep understanding of their leaders' strategy, capabilities, thoughts, and desires and a similar depth of knowledge of one's own strengths and weaknesses. It is critical to study the minds of the opposing generals and understand how they will react to one's moves. It is also important to understand the environment and terrain which will be contested.

Therefore I say, “Know the enemy and know yourself; in a hundred battles you will never be in peril.”

It also demands a corresponding masking of one’s plans.

All warfare is based on deception.

Chapter 3, Deception and Foreknowledge: Winning the Information War, sheds light on these topics. To fully utilize deception and foreknowledge effectively, it is critical to be able to act with blinding speed.

Speed is the essence of war. Take advantage of the enemy's unpreparedness; travel by unexpected routes and strike him where has taken no precautions.

To move with such speed does not mean to do things hastily. In reality, speed requires much preparation. Reducing the time it takes to make decisions, develop new weapons, implement strategies and respond to the enemy's moves is crucial. To think through and understand the opponent's reaction to one's possible moves also is essential.

To rely on rustics and not prepare is the greatest of crimes; to be prepared beforehand for any contingency is the greatest of Virtues.

Chapter 4, Speed and Preparation: Moving Swiftly To Overcome Resistance expands on these topics. Putting all these factors into play successfully does not occur naturally. One must be able to “shape” the enemy.

Therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him.

Shaping the enemy means changing the rules of the contest and making one's opponent conform to one's desires and actions. It means taking control of the situation away from the enemy and putting it into one's own hands. One way of shaping the enemy is by the skillful use of alliances. By building a strong web of alliances, the moves of the opponent can be limited. Also, by eliminating its alliances, one can weaken the enemy.

Look into the matter of his alliances and cause them to be severed and dissolved. If an enemy has alliances, the problem is grave and the enemy's position strong; if he has no alliances the problem is minor and the enemy's position weak.

By keeping plans and strategy closely held and using tactics to deceive the enemy about one's true intentions, one can continue to shape them by employing direct and indirect approaches

He who knows the art of the direct; (Cheng) and the indirect (Ch'i) approach will be victorious.

A direct attack is one that occurs in an expected place at an expected time. An indirect assault is one that comes as a surprise, both in location and timing. By combining direct attacks on the enemy to fix their leaders' attention and deceive them, one can then use indirect attacks to win complete victory. By utilizing the indirect and direct approaches and skillfully crafting alliances the opponent can be put on the defensive and made more vulnerable to future attacks. Chapter 5, Shape The Enemy: Preparing the Battlefield, tells more about this subject.

To achieve everything discussed so far takes a special kind of leader; one who can see the correct course of action and take it immediately, who can relate to the military forces, other civilian leaders and the population and gain commitment, who can empower subordinates to carry out the nation's strategy and who can use all personnel wisely. The attributes of this type of leader are discussed in detail in Chapter 6, Character-based Leadership: Leading by Example.


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; strategy; suntzu; tactics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: TenthAmendmentChampion

You’re quite welcome.

I think . . . some things get lost in the translation due to the cultural differences.

The . . . mindset of the locals of the author Sun Tzu

is MUCH MORE geared to application automatically because of their culture.

Anti-authoritarian Western mind-sets are not quite in that ball park.

ORDER and PROPER STATION IN LIFE are still deeply endemic values.

Also, the oriental is typically greatly better at patiently waiting for opportune moments for a lot of things.

One idiom horribly declares that waiting 10 years for vengeance is nothing. Many could wait 50 or 70 or 90 years for vengeance and feel quite smugly justified and superior for doing so—repeatedly savoring in their minds the eventual action to be taken.

Sometimes, I think that’s one of the reasons for so much suffering there.

God says: VENGEANCE IS MINE, says The Lord.

Anyway, Sun Tzu is certainly a classic and a fairly brilliant one. Westerners are crazy if they think they can

OUT SUN TZU ANY orientals.

They’ll do good to hold their on in such games. Very good if they do merely that.


21 posted on 04/19/2009 9:14:31 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
If God is for us, who can be against us? Romans 8:31

Still, Sun Tzu's wisdom should be followed.... failure to prepare is preparing for failure

22 posted on 04/19/2009 9:18:50 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

Conservatives with killer instinct?

Let me know when we find some.


23 posted on 04/19/2009 9:20:13 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
If we depend on God, how can we lose?

This is similar to a statement Obama made when he was sworn into office - our security is rooted in the justness of our cause. In fact, our security has nothing much to do with the justness of our cause.

Plenty of just people have suffered wholesale damage and destruction in the past. They were no more secure because of their just cause.

Similarly, plenty of people have had faith in God and suffered wholesale damage and destruction. They depended on God, and lost.

I'm just sayin'.

24 posted on 04/19/2009 9:23:45 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

bump


25 posted on 04/19/2009 9:27:27 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu
We need to develop effective tactics in order to win. As of right now, conservatives sink at tactics.

I completely agree. Do the names "Evil Party" and "Stupid Party" ring a bell? If not they should. Most conservatives are so naive they think playing by Marquess of Queensbury rules will defeat an opponent whose mantra is "by any means necessary" and all that implies. If you don't totally understand your enemy you will be vanquished.

Conservatives' biggest mistake over the past 70 years has been a failure to truly understand the implacable evil challenge we face. You can't "shape" your enemy unless you have an absolute knowledge of his mind.

26 posted on 04/19/2009 10:25:30 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Free California from public employee union rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

You have a point. There’s winning in eternity, and there’s winning on earth. The two may not be the same. A lot to think about in your reply. Thanks.


27 posted on 04/19/2009 10:28:52 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

My first thought on the weakness of the enemy: The left have attacked the weakest in our society by taking over the curriculum in the schools and attacking the minds of children. These children have now grown into voters, many of whom now think with a leftist mindset. A simple example is how the global warming scare was forced into the schools around the world with the showing of AlGore’s movie. The children are frightened, and bring their fears home to mom and dad who ignorantly “feel” “something must be done about this!” Most of these kids are still quite young. What happens when they hit the voting booth? How are they indoctrinating in the telling of the founding of our nation? There was a caller to Rush’s show the other day, a former leftist, who made the point of the right having to take back the curriculum in the schools. I think he is right.


28 posted on 04/20/2009 5:16:34 AM PDT by stayathomemom (Cat herder and empty nester)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

If that’s an honor, we’re in bigger trouble than I thought. ;’) ;’) ;’)

:’) You’re most welcome!


29 posted on 04/20/2009 5:52:13 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yawningotter
The enemy’s biggest weakness is that they are not on the side of truth.

Neither my friend have the Republicans been. Part of knowing yourself is knowing how morally corrupt your own party is.

30 posted on 04/20/2009 6:05:55 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, and Bill Clinton, in the Lincoln Bedroom, with some flowertop.


31 posted on 04/20/2009 6:27:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

bookmark


32 posted on 04/20/2009 7:00:13 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

Excellent tactics. It is time to get very tactical. Many of us with such military and other training will come in very handy. The libs have no such background. They are pure emotion and no analytics. Let’s go get em. They are puny compared to our collective mental prowess.


33 posted on 04/20/2009 8:24:52 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (If we say "YES. By your definition I guess I'm a rightwing extremist" en-mass, we can shut them down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

Sun Tzu beats Alinsky any day of the week...


34 posted on 04/20/2009 11:25:59 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. 2010 awaits.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Is that the 90s version of “Clue”?


35 posted on 04/20/2009 11:39:39 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

:’)


36 posted on 04/20/2009 12:04:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
What can we take from this? What are our enemies' weaknesses?

The truth.

Should we take this discussion private so as not to disclose our tactics? If so, what's a good way to do that? Yahoo Groups by invite only? private chat?

We must all meet at Master Su Ha Chee's hermitage and train day and night to master the technique of the secret 5 drunken heavenly fist styles!
37 posted on 05/17/2009 2:19:28 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson