Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's talk about the F-104 Starfighter

Posted on 02/15/2009 1:26:24 PM PST by mowowie

The F-104 Starigher and all it's variants. Todays Sunday reading obsession.

I wanna hear from the FR pro's!

From what I have read so far, The plane had spectacular abilities coupled with very un-desired effects.


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: f104; inteceptor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: 19th LA Inf

I always thought the same, once I learned the Brit meaning of PRANG. However, having literally grown up around the pilots and maintenance folks at Muniz ANGB (my Dad was a fixture at Muniz for 42 years,) I would fly with them any day of the week.


21 posted on 02/15/2009 1:56:11 PM PST by JRios1968 (Sarah Palin is what Willis was talkin' about!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: joe.fralick
Amazing performance, though.

Yes it was operational and in active duty from 1958 to 1967 and then with the AF National Guard to 1975. Designed by the legendary Kelly Johnson of P-38 through U-2 and SR-71 fame, it was tasked as an interceptor against incoming Soviet Bombers. Thus it wasn't designed for long ranges and heavy weapon loads, 'get up and scoot' was its purpose.

If you saw the movie "The Right Stuff", you saw the dramatization of Chuck Yeager flying the NF-104 with an added rocket motor that could and did reach 120,000 feet. His flight in the movie ended badly but these flights continued as training until 1971.

22 posted on 02/15/2009 1:57:36 PM PST by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joe.fralick

Understood it was the first jet to break the sound barrier going straight up ....


23 posted on 02/15/2009 1:57:45 PM PST by SkyDancer ("America July 4, 1776 - February 13, 2009 ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 19th LA Inf

The Canadian variant, built by Canadair, had an upward-firing ejection seat. When briefing visiting American pilots, they had to point this out and warn them NOT to roll before bailing out.


24 posted on 02/15/2009 2:31:07 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
I think you are confusing angle of incidence with dihedral. Dihedral is the angle of wing in relation to the vertical axis, not the longitudinal axis like you are referring to.

I also believe the F-104 design was modified with a reverse vertical stabilizer, using the forward slanted wings, they called it the X-27 Lancer. they also installed a larger and better engine. (General Electric J79) This was a much better design and stability problems inherent of the F-104 completely disappeared. They hoped this version would be ready for production by 1972. All in all it was a dream to fly from test pilot reviews.

25 posted on 02/15/2009 2:31:32 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go? (ACORN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I’m wondering how much this plane would benefit with modern flight control computers.

Still obsolete but it would be an interesting and exciting experiment.


26 posted on 02/15/2009 2:34:47 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Historix

YUP!!!!!


27 posted on 02/15/2009 2:37:26 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Dihedral is when the root of the wing is lower than the tip of the wing. The more dihedral, the faster a plane snaps back to horzontal flight after being rolled to one side or the other.

It’s similar to rake and trail on a motorcycle...the way it afects handling.


28 posted on 02/15/2009 2:38:55 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

The Turks use to fly the 104 and crash them on a regular basis.


29 posted on 02/15/2009 2:40:57 PM PST by oldenuff2no (I'm a VET and damn proud of it!!! I did not fight for a socialist America!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

>When briefing visiting American pilots, they had to point this out and warn them NOT to roll before bailing out.

Just like the Big-Endian vs Little-Endian debate in computers... ;)


30 posted on 02/15/2009 2:41:27 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

For those who don’t know what that red rocket-looking thing was, that’s the North American Eagle. It’s driven by a guy named Ed Shadle, and the team is based out of Seattle. They took a junked F-104 fuselage, got it all repaired, took off the wings, added some wheels...and they plan to try to go for the World Land Speed Record. They KNOW it goes over Mach 1 easily, which is why they wanted to go for that fuselage.

Problem is...even if they do make it, the new Bloodhound SSC is designed to go another 200 mph faster.


31 posted on 02/15/2009 2:44:37 PM PST by hoagy62 (Obama: slowly sucking the positive attitude out of the US since 11-4-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mowowie
The F-104 was a Thoroughbred built for speed and climb rate. Not only was it light with a very powerful engine, but it also had a much reduced wing area, which was highly loaded (150 lb / ft) at max takeoff, but resulted in far less drag at speed.

Not surprisingly it was fast as hell. It was the first Mach 2 aircraft and the first aircraft to simultaneously hold the world speed and altitude records.

The USAF cut their order from over 900 to around 250 when they realized that there was more to being a great interceptor than raw power. It then went on to a much more prolific foreign sales career. However, it ran into trouble when the Germans used it as a fighter-bomer (G model). The already high wing loading became an even greater problem and less skilled pilots had a tendency to mort themselves in it.

The Starfighter’s J-79 had a thrust of almost 18,000 lbs. in afterburner and I've always wondered just how fast that airframe would go if you could make a PW F-100 fit into it with 25,000 lbs. of thrust.

32 posted on 02/15/2009 2:46:16 PM PST by SampleMan (I'm not drinking the kool aid! Is it 2013 yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe.fralick

Italy used them as well.


33 posted on 02/15/2009 2:47:36 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, Englan d. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mowowie
The wings were sharp enough that they could be used to peel potatoes ....

Don't believe me? Look here
34 posted on 02/15/2009 2:47:46 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Same here
I was looking at that long fusalage and then looking where the Vulan cannon was mounted thouhgt “Sh!t, that thing looks like it could turn into it’s own bullets!”


35 posted on 02/15/2009 2:48:18 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
My bad, that actually looks like an apple
36 posted on 02/15/2009 2:48:52 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

For years the CANUKS kept one of their CF-104 in this tiger stripe color scheme. I always loved it.

For the truly interested, the CL-1200 Lancer was prototyped as a follow on design, but was never ordered.


37 posted on 02/15/2009 2:56:36 PM PST by SampleMan (I'm not drinking the kool aid! Is it 2013 yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie
Italian AF also had them in early 70's.

The planform for supersonic performance changed significantly after their production, so except for power/weight was way obsolete in a few years subsequent.

I'll bet that approach from post 17 was impressive though.

I can't imagine the thing staying aloft much more than an hour.

Is it true thrust/wght was greater than one?

38 posted on 02/15/2009 2:58:11 PM PST by jnsun (The LEFT: The need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie
As an Air Force ROTC cadet we visited a base where F-104s were based and we all got a chance to "fly" a simulator. I was first in the cockpit. The instructor and fellow cadets stood over me as I performed some simple maneuvers. I thought I'd see how fast she would go so I kicked in afterburner and when I passed 1200mph I decided to head for the stars. All of a sudden my visual horizon said 90degrees all black and my altimeter was unwinding. I ejected! A red light flashed and the flight simulator was reset for the next pilot.

The simulator officer had a large greenbar print out and he explained that the Star Fighter had a T tail and required controlled inputs for pitch up. I had exceeded the speed and ptich up angle and had torn the tail off. I asked if I had survived and he just grinned!

39 posted on 02/15/2009 3:29:33 PM PST by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

SICK!

Thats a very interesing pic.
Seen this pic before but but never realized the conection.

SAme engine? J79, maybe an older J-65?

Madmen both the same air and land. What badasses pilot these things?


40 posted on 02/15/2009 3:46:36 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson