Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Grammar Pet Peeves (Shameless Vanity)
My Fertile Mind | 12/30/08 | Your Uncle Miltie

Posted on 12/30/2008 10:02:49 AM PST by Uncle Miltie

I apologize for the shameless vanity, but I'm going to propose a thread for today: Your pet peeves about others' grammar on FR.

I'm not innocent. But, can we please use apostrophes for possessives and not use apostrophes for plurals?

Please chime in with your pet peeves.

Possessive Example:

Correct: My dog's bone is in the yard.

Incorrect: My dogs bone is in the yard.

Plural Example:

Correct: My dogs are in the yard.

Incorrect: My dog's are in the yard.

Admin Mod: Please move this thread as appropriate.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: englishliteracy; freepun; frilliterati; grammarnazi; humor; lol; pedant; spellcheck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-308 next last
To: Robert DeLong; maggief

mabey...

;0)


161 posted on 12/30/2008 11:00:29 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: OnTheDress

oop’s: differtense


162 posted on 12/30/2008 11:02:50 AM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Must be a Harvard graduate — cany evin spell jooze.


163 posted on 12/30/2008 11:03:02 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20 (The common argument that crime is caused by poverty is a kind of slander on the poor. H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
"aesthetically compromised "

WOW!!!! I like that. But, it's a bit mild when referring to the Helen Thomas pic, don't you thing??? I'd call it a masterpiece of understatement.

164 posted on 12/30/2008 11:07:10 AM PST by Turret Gunner A20 (The common argument that crime is caused by poverty is a kind of slander on the poor. H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
then/than

their/there/they're

your/you're

Your examples of posessive/plural mishaps

to/too/two

The imaginary word "alot" (usually should be "a lot")

accept/except

There are many more...

165 posted on 12/30/2008 11:08:16 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Butt, moistly I hate is when people are so oftenly Miss Spelling Tory.


166 posted on 12/30/2008 11:11:48 AM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Looks like his buddy is trying to repair their image.

Too late.


167 posted on 12/30/2008 11:15:37 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Ice cream when ever I here John Lennon's "And no religion, too!"

Its "No religion NEITHER!", dammit!

168 posted on 12/30/2008 11:15:47 AM PST by Revolting cat! (Don't rush to be savage!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Please chime in with your pet peeves.

I have several.

1 - Applying the word "gender" when referring to the sex of humans. Gender applies to grammar, not human sex. There are sex related issues, not gender related issue. I expect to one day hear "was the gender good for you”.

2 - I got married. No, you married.

3 - The preacher married us. No, the preacher didn’t marry you; he performed your marriage ceremony.

4 - This not a grammar issue but the use of the word "whatever" and the expression, "you know" are annoying.

169 posted on 12/30/2008 11:16:17 AM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Is "is you is or is you ain't" (Luis Jordan & Delbert McClinton) correct?
170 posted on 12/30/2008 11:17:02 AM PST by Revolting cat! (Don't rush to be savage!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Someone left the cake out in the rain"

Why "the cake"? And why "Someone" and not "Somebody"?

I'll never have the recipe again.

171 posted on 12/30/2008 11:19:47 AM PST by Revolting cat! (Don't rush to be savage!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Our own President-elect said: “President Bush has invited Michelle and I to the White House.” Harvard must be proud.


172 posted on 12/30/2008 11:23:17 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
"Because the contraction sounds like "of" when spoken, I think people have forgotten that the contraction stands for "have"."

That was the point of my original post. I didn't understand the response to my post. Was the poster implying that the contractions for "would have" and "could have" were improper?

173 posted on 12/30/2008 11:23:36 AM PST by Try_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Harvard must be proud.

It is, with or without Mr. Obama. :-)

Of course, if you are to go by the available records, you'd never know he went to Harvard.

174 posted on 12/30/2008 11:26:10 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Here is one: don’t start sentences with “but”.


175 posted on 12/30/2008 11:26:22 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

But, can we please use apostrophes for possessives and not use apostrophes for plurals?
_______________________________
You’re point’s are we’ll taken. Will be more careful with future post’s.


176 posted on 12/30/2008 11:26:40 AM PST by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Oh, and another current pet peeve is the abuse of quotation marks for emphasis.

Buy "now"! Sale ends "today"! We will "not" be undersold!

177 posted on 12/30/2008 11:30:03 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Try_Freedom

> “Would of” or “Could of” instead of the contractions “Would’ve” or “Could’ve.”

Don’t you mean “would have” or “could have”?


178 posted on 12/30/2008 11:32:05 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

179 posted on 12/30/2008 11:33:15 AM PST by ErnBatavia ("Zero"..STILL using that stupid "Office of The President Elect" podium....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Here’s mine. You don’t ‘loan’ someone money, you ‘lend’ it. You make a loan. Lend = verb, loan = noun.
Everyone gets that wrong.


180 posted on 12/30/2008 11:34:21 AM PST by waverna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-308 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson