Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The lies of Lynchburg: How U.S. evolutionists taught the Nazis.
Answers In Genesis ^ | September 1997 | Carl Wieland

Posted on 12/01/2008 2:33:55 PM PST by Fichori

First published:
Creation 19(4):22–23
September 1997

by Carl Wieland

The chilling revelations of a recent television documentary1 expose the disturbing consequences of evolutionary ways of thinking. Beginning in the 1920s, many thousands of people in the United States were sterilised against their will and without their consent, to prevent ‘undesirable breeding’. Over 8,000 of these procedures took place at a major centre to which such ‘undesirables’ were sent, in Lynchburg, Virginia.

(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: crevo; crevolist; eugenics; evolution; hitler; lynchburg; nazi; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-338 next last
To: E=MC2

[[Why do you source your answers with “Coming Soon”. Does that mean within our lifetimes?]]

Why do Macroevolutionists preface assumptions with “Answers coming soon” (But htey never do)


281 posted on 12/03/2008 8:44:51 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

Uh, the cousin that coined the term ‘eugenics’ was Sir Francis Galton.

Madly in love?

I sure hope you don’t mean that like I think you do, or perhaps your thinking of a different cousin...

Oy!


282 posted on 12/03/2008 9:04:29 PM PST by Fichori (I believe in a Woman's right to choose, even if she hasn't been born yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: E=MC2; headsonpikes
Or that Islamists are strong anti-evolutionists.

Islam also forbids abortion. Shall I stop believing that carving a small child to bits and throwing it in the trash is evil because Islam says it's evil?

I suppose vegetarians should all start eating meat because Hitler is a vegetarian, right?

283 posted on 12/03/2008 9:52:47 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
“Islam also forbids abortion. Shall I stop believing that carving a small child to bits and throwing it in the trash is evil because Islam says it's evil?” [excerpt]
Ooooh, somebody just got kissed by a fish...

Home run!

;-)
284 posted on 12/03/2008 10:12:08 PM PST by Fichori (I believe in a Woman's right to choose, even if she hasn't been born yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Fichori

Was just a rumor I heard- Just wanted to know how it feels to spread rumors and innacurate statements- I feel like an evo now


285 posted on 12/03/2008 10:45:12 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

There must have been some sort of physiological change that occurred after he got bit by that nasty bug while on his cruise.

Hey, if pond slime can evolve into elephants, then just imagine what kind of evolution a simple bug bite can could bring about...


286 posted on 12/04/2008 12:29:57 AM PST by Fichori (I believe in a Woman's right to choose, even if she hasn't been born yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
If the TOE'rs did not have by law pupils to instill their TOE the discipline would have long been dead.

By the way, evolutionary biologists in Britain and America (and many other countries, like Sweden, etc) pushed for eugenic legislation. Eugenics was a fake science dumped onto the public and--with some measure of success-- reinforced by legislation. Francis Galton (Darwin's cousin) developed a plan to force eugenics into the education system, into the legal system, and finally, into the religion of the people. This plan was partly successfull in all three goals. I wonder if evolutionary scientists will ever apologize for these frauds and crimes.

287 posted on 12/04/2008 5:35:58 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
By the way, evolutionary biologists in Britain and America (and many other countries, like Sweden, etc) pushed for eugenic legislation. Eugenics was a fake science dumped onto the public and--with some measure of success-- reinforced by legislation. Francis Galton (Darwin's cousin) developed a plan to force eugenics into the education system, into the legal system, and finally, into the religion of the people. This plan was partly successfull in all three goals. I wonder if evolutionary scientists will ever apologize for these frauds and crimes.

I have no expectation that the evolutionary scientists will as a group ever apologize for anything in this flesh age. They will not begin to take responsibility for their demands to remove the Creator (which this nation acknowledges as the Giver of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness) from the seed bed of their houses of worship, public schools.

They proclaim from their walled estates the descend from great apes and have nothing to instill a moral code into these minds filled with mush. They are the first to jut out their elongated chins and protect their religious faith with more fervor than the majority of Christians protect their faith.

But Christ did say these things need be, and the Heavenly Father is the one taking notes on even the inner thoughts of these he placed in flesh bodies.

288 posted on 12/04/2008 5:57:50 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; Mr. Silverback
nothing in science is ever “proven”.

A very convenient philosophical principle for a pseudo-scientist to espouse, especially if he has no intention of backing up his stories with proof in the first place.

289 posted on 12/04/2008 5:58:31 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
It amazes me how the Evolutionists here on FR will wholeheartedly defend Evolution on a thread that is about the relationship between Evolution and Eugenics.

Good point. The supreme irony of it--which seems to elude these superior evolutionary geniuses--makes one pause in bafflement.

"The influence primarily responsible for the modern eugenics movement was the establishment of the doctrine of organic evolution following the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species in 1859."

- Samuel J. Holmes, Human Genetics, 1936, chapter 25.


290 posted on 12/04/2008 6:03:57 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: E=MC2
Here was your question to me. It was me that asked you where Darwin promoted eugenics.

He may have been referring to Leonard Darwin (Charles Darwin's son.)

291 posted on 12/04/2008 6:08:24 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
There have been dozens of Evolutionists who promoted Eugenics in the name of Evolution, some even bearing the last name of Darwin.

IIRC, in a preface to some eugenic book, Leonard Darwin said that his activities and the goals of the Eugenic Society were in accord with his father's wishes. It seems a bit odd for an evolutionist to maintain the position that Charles Darwin had nothing to do with what his entire family was involved in. We are supposed to believe that Charles was sane, but all his descendants went mad.

292 posted on 12/04/2008 6:14:48 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Fichori

Thanks, FRiend. I willl now run my fat butt around the bases. :-)


293 posted on 12/04/2008 6:46:28 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
Evidence not proof. The convenient philosophical principle is espoused THROUGHOUT Science. You don't hear Chemists talking about the “proof” of atomic orbitals, only evidence that supports the theory.

Your ignorance of science is noted.

The theory of evolution through natural selection of genetic variation is supported by a literal TON of evidence. Many thousands of experiments have relied upon the theory to explain and predict data.

294 posted on 12/04/2008 6:48:41 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
He may have been referring to Leonard Darwin (Charles Darwin's son.)

Ha Ha!

295 posted on 12/04/2008 6:49:45 AM PST by E=MC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; ZULU

I may be off FR completely for a couple of days, and will likely respond to you gentlemen over the weekend.

Have a nice week.


296 posted on 12/04/2008 7:14:02 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
This is just the tip of the iceberg. The DOR (Daughters of the American Revolution) was one of over 100 hereditary organizations founded at the turn of the century to preserve the clean bloodlines of the nations founders against the waves of scruffy Irish and Italian Catholic immigrants of the day, as were all of the exclusive private schools that we know today, such as Choate and Andover.

Yes, ideas have consequences, and erroneous ideas like materialistic evolution, have very grave consequences.

297 posted on 12/04/2008 7:41:03 AM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
nothing in science is ever “proven”.

The convenient philosophical principle is espoused THROUGHOUT Science.

Indeed, every astronomy book is, as you say, careful to point out that 'the earth goes around the sun' can never be proven.

298 posted on 12/04/2008 8:18:37 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode

Are you one of those FR Creationists who thinks the Sun circles the Earth?

And yes, it is still called the Heliocentric Theory, not the Heliocentric Truth, even though all observations and facts provide evidence in support of the theory.


299 posted on 12/04/2008 8:28:02 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Have a nice week-end.

Peace.


300 posted on 12/04/2008 8:31:21 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson