Posted on 12/01/2008 2:33:55 PM PST by Fichori
First published:
Creation 19(4):2223
September 1997
by Carl Wieland
The chilling revelations of a recent television documentary1 expose the disturbing consequences of evolutionary ways of thinking. Beginning in the 1920s, many thousands of people in the United States were sterilised against their will and without their consent, to prevent undesirable breeding. Over 8,000 of these procedures took place at a major centre to which such undesirables were sent, in Lynchburg, Virginia.
(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...
[[Why do you source your answers with Coming Soon. Does that mean within our lifetimes?]]
Why do Macroevolutionists preface assumptions with “Answers coming soon” (But htey never do)
Uh, the cousin that coined the term ‘eugenics’ was Sir Francis Galton.
Madly in love?
I sure hope you don’t mean that like I think you do, or perhaps your thinking of a different cousin...
Oy!
Islam also forbids abortion. Shall I stop believing that carving a small child to bits and throwing it in the trash is evil because Islam says it's evil?
I suppose vegetarians should all start eating meat because Hitler is a vegetarian, right?
Islam also forbids abortion. Shall I stop believing that carving a small child to bits and throwing it in the trash is evil because Islam says it's evil? [excerpt]Ooooh, somebody just got kissed by a fish...
Was just a rumor I heard- Just wanted to know how it feels to spread rumors and innacurate statements- I feel like an evo now
There must have been some sort of physiological change that occurred after he got bit by that nasty bug while on his cruise.
Hey, if pond slime can evolve into elephants, then just imagine what kind of evolution a simple bug bite can could bring about...
By the way, evolutionary biologists in Britain and America (and many other countries, like Sweden, etc) pushed for eugenic legislation. Eugenics was a fake science dumped onto the public and--with some measure of success-- reinforced by legislation. Francis Galton (Darwin's cousin) developed a plan to force eugenics into the education system, into the legal system, and finally, into the religion of the people. This plan was partly successfull in all three goals. I wonder if evolutionary scientists will ever apologize for these frauds and crimes.
I have no expectation that the evolutionary scientists will as a group ever apologize for anything in this flesh age. They will not begin to take responsibility for their demands to remove the Creator (which this nation acknowledges as the Giver of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness) from the seed bed of their houses of worship, public schools.
They proclaim from their walled estates the descend from great apes and have nothing to instill a moral code into these minds filled with mush. They are the first to jut out their elongated chins and protect their religious faith with more fervor than the majority of Christians protect their faith.
But Christ did say these things need be, and the Heavenly Father is the one taking notes on even the inner thoughts of these he placed in flesh bodies.
A very convenient philosophical principle for a pseudo-scientist to espouse, especially if he has no intention of backing up his stories with proof in the first place.
Good point. The supreme irony of it--which seems to elude these superior evolutionary geniuses--makes one pause in bafflement.
"The influence primarily responsible for the modern eugenics movement was the establishment of the doctrine of organic evolution following the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species in 1859."- Samuel J. Holmes, Human Genetics, 1936, chapter 25.
He may have been referring to Leonard Darwin (Charles Darwin's son.)
IIRC, in a preface to some eugenic book, Leonard Darwin said that his activities and the goals of the Eugenic Society were in accord with his father's wishes. It seems a bit odd for an evolutionist to maintain the position that Charles Darwin had nothing to do with what his entire family was involved in. We are supposed to believe that Charles was sane, but all his descendants went mad.
Thanks, FRiend. I willl now run my fat butt around the bases. :-)
Your ignorance of science is noted.
The theory of evolution through natural selection of genetic variation is supported by a literal TON of evidence. Many thousands of experiments have relied upon the theory to explain and predict data.
Ha Ha!
I may be off FR completely for a couple of days, and will likely respond to you gentlemen over the weekend.
Have a nice week.
Yes, ideas have consequences, and erroneous ideas like materialistic evolution, have very grave consequences.
The convenient philosophical principle is espoused THROUGHOUT Science.
Indeed, every astronomy book is, as you say, careful to point out that 'the earth goes around the sun' can never be proven.
Are you one of those FR Creationists who thinks the Sun circles the Earth?
And yes, it is still called the Heliocentric Theory, not the Heliocentric Truth, even though all observations and facts provide evidence in support of the theory.
Have a nice week-end.
Peace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.