Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former adult star working at local school (Former female porn star, that is)
6ABC Action News ^ | November 21, 2008 | Chad Pradelli

Posted on 11/22/2008 3:49:18 AM PST by Stoat

VINELAND, N.J. - November 21, 2008 - (WPVI) -- She was an adult film star who went by the name Crystal Gunns. But she reportedly says that's part of her past.

She now an aid at D'Ippolito Elementary in Vineland, New Jersey, and that has some parents furious.

"I understand it's her personal life, but I don't feel someone with that background should be working with young children at all," said preschool teacher Maria Martin.

Crystal Gunns is apparently retired. She's now Louisa Tuck, a cafeteria and playground aide at D'Ippolito Elementary.

 

District officials were tipped off about the situation a few weeks back.

They were stunned.

A background check turned up nothing. They wanted to take action, but lawyers advised them not to. Tuck hadn't done anything illegal.

Some parents agree.

"It's in her past. We all do things in our past. And as long as she's not interfering with any kids, I don't see any problem with it," said Raul Cordova of Vineland, N.J.

Action News was unable to reach Tuck. She also works at the local YMCA. A co-worker described her as a great person.

In a interview with a local newspaper, Tuck defended her ability to work around children despite her past career.

(edit)

The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: bowchickabow; crystalgunns; education; newjersey; nj; porn; pornstar; publikskoolz; topheavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 next last
To: Stoat

i don’t think this qulaifies for much except interesting PTO meetings maybe


121 posted on 11/22/2008 10:33:07 AM PST by wardaddy (Monarchists for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I only wish I was that thin.


122 posted on 11/22/2008 10:36:18 AM PST by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
We have some sluts right here on FR!!!

lol.....whew....the anti-freepers at Clown Posse were merciless to some women here on FR

*most clowns were women too

123 posted on 11/22/2008 10:38:01 AM PST by wardaddy (Monarchists for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: fortunate sun

I actually agree with you about letting this woman slide since she is mainly just a cafeteria assitant

but you can’t hold Christians to standards you yourself don’t believe in and then call them on it.

there is this notion amongst non Christians.....secular Jews most often tout these notions when criticizing Christian morality.....”that Christians have to forgive anything that involves contrition”...more or less

that’s simply not true.

some posters here think this woman is a threat to the kids and that has nothing to do with forgiveness

forgive her fine but get her another job....that’s what they would say

I think Christians should discern forgiveness carefully.


124 posted on 11/22/2008 10:45:46 AM PST by wardaddy (Monarchists for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Eaker; Allegra; TheMom; pax_et_bonum; Xenalyte
lol.....whew....the anti-freepers at Clown Posse were merciless to some women here on FR

Actually, we addressed that very thing once.

The Clown Posse "slandered" some of us, including the Slut Sisters. Called us "white trash".

We thought that was just darling, and embraced the term.

Made a video for 'em, with appropriate soundtrack!

White Trash HoeDown

They didn't like the video.

The guns are all plastic.. Dollar Store's Finest.

125 posted on 11/22/2008 10:56:23 AM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I didn’t state I whether I was a Christian or not, it was some assumption (and we know what happens when you assume) put forward by a babbling, detective-wannabe but that’s neither here nor there on this question.
Many get bothered when the media focuses on the religious when they do something wrong but overlook a coach, teacher, etc., who commits the same act.
The inverse is wrong as well. We don’t have scarlet letters or the Mark of Cain. People are imperfect, the recognize their failings, repent and move forward with their lives. We are not Philistines or muslims, we are Americans. This is the land of second chances, third chances, fourth chances.
That was my only point. Thanks for the opportunity to chat.


126 posted on 11/22/2008 11:05:52 AM PST by fortunate sun (Proud Palinista!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: auntyfemenist
actually, in this case she has turned from working in an immoral business and is trying to live a decent life. Why speak against her now?

No, this is a case where someone whose past is anathema to family values is in a highly influential position with children where leading by example is paramount. Her past is not the example anyone would want kids to follow and it obviously can't be buried as evident by the situation. She certainly can't explain to kids her past with any justification.

I don’t think you shouldn’t call out someone who has turned away from sin.

The paramount concern is kids being exposed to someone who for years encouraged immoral values and not the adult.
127 posted on 11/22/2008 11:22:40 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Are you saying that once someone has done something immoral, they're now a part of the "untouchable caste" and are not to be allowed into "decent society?"

Careful with such a blanket statement. By your line of reasoning any immoral act, including someone who molested children in the past but then renounces such an act, should then be allowed to be near children. Adults make poor choices that can limit their choices in the future. Her porn past should preclude her from any occupation that involves kids.
128 posted on 11/22/2008 11:29:08 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: fortunate sun
Wasn’t preaching anything, I was pointing out obvious hypocrisy. There are values behind the teachings, among those nearest the top is the importance of spiritual above the literal word.

I don't know what hypocrisy you are referring to or what religious tradition you are appealing to, but it certainly sounds as if you subscribe to some strange new-age spiritualism over any real Christian theology.

You don’t reach out to the sick among the well.

Sure I do, I just don't put the "sick" in charge of feeding and caring for the "well." I certainly wouldn't put sexual perverts like her in charge of caring for children in any capacity.

I’m I too understand YOU are the arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned?

Of course I am in no way an arbiter of final salvation. However, you can bet your existential rear-end that as a taxpayer and a parent I take a very active role in deciding who gets a pay check for working with children in the public schools!

It must be a heavy burden upon you, brother.

Well thank you for the concern, bro! Fear not, however. I take my responsibilities as a taxpayer and as a parent seriously enough to fight the good fight and keep these sexual deviants away from children. It's really no burden at all!

If this woman seeks to be saved and her actions are of good heart, she is saved. PERIOD.

Now THAT is funny! Having previously accusing ME of trying to be an "arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned", YOU are now claiming to be the final "arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned." How hilarious that someone who began their post by saying "I was pointing out obvious hypocrisy" can end it in such complete and utter hypocrisy themselves! Bravo!!!

129 posted on 11/22/2008 11:36:13 AM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: visualops
So according to you, someone who repents and turns their life around should still be ostracized and vilified for their past misdeeds?

So according to you an adult who knowingly and willingly commits any immoral acts regardless how egregious the act should still be in a position that is easily accessible to children?

This woman is actually an example of what immoral people should do which is to stop being immoral and change their lifestyle.

She is an example of how a person limits his or her future choices based on past choices. Her past should preclude her from any work involving children.

You are the Soup Nazi of sin:

Oh I see, you accuse me of ostracizing and vilifying while you spew the insults to defend a former porn star working with children.
130 posted on 11/22/2008 11:40:24 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Kadric
Have to wonder if the ones calling for her dismissal are the same as those supporting sex-ed and the teaching that a gay life style is the same as a hetrosexual life style...

...and rent her films

131 posted on 11/22/2008 11:51:04 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (The mob got President Barabbas; America got shafted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

There sure are some stick in the butt people on this thread!


132 posted on 11/22/2008 11:54:45 AM PST by Eaker (Dutch expression "You can give a monkey a gold ring, but it stays an ugly thing." - EscapedDutch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
If this woman seeks to be saved and her actions are of good heart, she is saved. PERIOD. Now THAT is funny! Having previously accusing ME of trying to be an "arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned", YOU are now claiming to be the final "arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned." How hilarious that someone who began their post by saying "I was pointing out obvious hypocrisy" can end it in such complete and utter hypocrisy themselves! Bravo!!!

I am not claiming to be the arbiter, I am making statement of fact. Those who accept Christ as their Lord, shall be saved. Not my words, read your Bible or speak to your clergyman. Our discussion is ended.

133 posted on 11/22/2008 11:55:29 AM PST by fortunate sun (Proud Palinista!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Eaker; humblegunner
There sure are some stick in the butt people on this thread!

They've got bugs on them.

134 posted on 11/22/2008 12:00:14 PM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

she must have one hell of a backache carrying those 2-gallon jug full of implants with her all day.

someone on the board of education must of used their influence to get this person a job. no doubt about it. there was some collusion going on.


135 posted on 11/22/2008 1:39:45 PM PST by Coleus (Abortion and Physician-assisted Murder (aka-Euthanasia), Don't Democrats just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Are you saying that once someone has done something immoral, they're now a part of the "untouchable caste" and are not to be allowed into "decent society?"

Careful with such a blanket statement. By your line of reasoning any immoral act, including someone who molested children in the past but then renounces such an act, should then be allowed to be near children. Adults make poor choices that can limit their choices in the future. Her porn past should preclude her from any occupation that involves kids.

She participated in LEGAL ACTIVITIES with ADULTS, NOT CHILDREN. You might want to be careful as well, given the sort of ilk who elected the next administration: There are many among them who would say that Christian Conservative heterosexuals shouldn't be allowed around children because of their world views.

Mark

136 posted on 11/22/2008 2:04:38 PM PST by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: mefistofelerevised
Who in there right mind would want their kids being taught by a slut? Porn star are sluts.

Better than a faggot teaching perversions me fisto!

137 posted on 11/22/2008 2:04:46 PM PST by Eaker (Dutch expression "You can give a monkey a gold ring, but it stays an ugly thing." - EscapedDutch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

100% attendance for me if any of my teachers looked like that. I’d be a trouble maker if she had a paddle too.


138 posted on 11/22/2008 2:08:52 PM PST by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CE2949BB; Larry Lucido; Squantos; Eaker

A couple points of interest here gentlemen...


139 posted on 11/22/2008 2:11:03 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

Nice CD holder she has there......probably needs all the silicone to keep from bumping that snoot of her’s !

Talk about a beak !


140 posted on 11/22/2008 2:19:08 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson