To: visualops
So according to you, someone who repents and turns their life around should still be ostracized and vilified for their past misdeeds?
So according to you an adult who knowingly and willingly commits any immoral acts regardless how egregious the act should still be in a position that is easily accessible to children?
This woman is actually an example of what immoral people should do which is to stop being immoral and change their lifestyle.
She is an example of how a person limits his or her future choices based on past choices. Her past should preclude her from any work involving children.
You are the Soup Nazi of sin:
Oh I see, you accuse me of ostracizing and vilifying while you spew the insults to defend a former porn star working with children.
130 posted on
11/22/2008 11:40:24 AM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Man50D
You are the Soup Nazi of sin:
Oh I see, you accuse me of ostracizing and vilifying while you spew the insults to defend a former porn star working with children.
Lighten up buddy, get some humor.
So according to you an adult who knowingly and willingly commits any immoral acts regardless how egregious the act should still be in a position that is easily accessible to children?
She was an exhibitionist/slut, not a pedophile. Any job dealing with the public gives one "access to children". I think you could better direct your energies towards approved curricula taught by all those non-former-porn-stars than a part-time lunch lady with a sleazy past.
148 posted on
11/22/2008 5:37:15 PM PST by
visualops
(portraits.artlife.us or visit my freeper page)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson