I don't know what hypocrisy you are referring to or what religious tradition you are appealing to, but it certainly sounds as if you subscribe to some strange new-age spiritualism over any real Christian theology.
You don’t reach out to the sick among the well.
Sure I do, I just don't put the "sick" in charge of feeding and caring for the "well." I certainly wouldn't put sexual perverts like her in charge of caring for children in any capacity.
I’m I too understand YOU are the arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned?
Of course I am in no way an arbiter of final salvation. However, you can bet your existential rear-end that as a taxpayer and a parent I take a very active role in deciding who gets a pay check for working with children in the public schools!
It must be a heavy burden upon you, brother.
Well thank you for the concern, bro! Fear not, however. I take my responsibilities as a taxpayer and as a parent seriously enough to fight the good fight and keep these sexual deviants away from children. It's really no burden at all!
If this woman seeks to be saved and her actions are of good heart, she is saved. PERIOD.
Now THAT is funny! Having previously accusing ME of trying to be an "arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned", YOU are now claiming to be the final "arbiter of those who are worthy of salvation and those who are to be damned." How hilarious that someone who began their post by saying "I was pointing out obvious hypocrisy" can end it in such complete and utter hypocrisy themselves! Bravo!!!
I am not claiming to be the arbiter, I am making statement of fact. Those who accept Christ as their Lord, shall be saved. Not my words, read your Bible or speak to your clergyman. Our discussion is ended.