Skip to comments.
Man blames penis iPhone gaffe on glitch (Told wife raunchy pic attached itself to email)
Metro (U.K.) ^
| November 19, 2008
Posted on 11/21/2008 11:34:40 PM PST by Stoat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
1
posted on
11/21/2008 11:34:40 PM PST
by
Stoat
To: Slings and Arrows; martin_fierro; Swordmaker
“It’s such a good shot that one must wonder if he actually practiced it a few times before getting it right.”
2
posted on
11/21/2008 11:35:31 PM PST
by
Stoat
(Palin / Coulter 2012: A Strong America Through Unapologetic Conservatism)
To: Stoat
"Hillary, I swear to you as God is my witness, all I did was put the damn phone in my pocket, the high intensity light sensitive lens must have illuminated my groin enough to accidentally snag a picture of ol' Willie boy, and I had that draft email I was workin' on, and you know the rest, this shouldn't have any impact on your upcoming confimration as Secretary of State, ok chubby cheeks? C'mon, I'm not gonna screw up this late in the game, you know me better than that, huh?"
***** WHAM *****
"Damn Hill, do you always have to heave that same heavy ashtray?!?! OWWWW, that hurts!"
3
posted on
11/21/2008 11:39:59 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(Thomas Jefferson was RIGHT about the need to water the Tree of Liberty, and with WHAT.)
To: Stoat
Yep, I think all of us have gotten into a bit of trouble, at one time or another, from listening to the smaller head.
4
posted on
11/21/2008 11:48:04 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
To: Stoat; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
Read fast before the "No thanks." shows up!
To: Slings and Arrows
Read fast before the "No thanks." shows up!Oh lawdy...well, I suppose if I'm going to be banned from FR, this is a suitably dramatic way of making it happen.
Y'all can say "see, this is what we get for allowing scruffy, furry creatures into Free Republic...they cause nothing but trouble".
"sigh"
6
posted on
11/22/2008 12:18:36 AM PST
by
Stoat
(Palin / Coulter 2012: A Strong America Through Unapologetic Conservatism)
To: Stoat
i bet he did.
he may be a perv and a cheat, but she is dumber than a box of rocks!
a glitch sent it out? if one really tries hard to believe it, maybe...but come on, you would have to be trying so hard your brains fell out...
a glitch does not photograph your groin either “at just the right moment” on its own and then send it out to a array of unknown women. if it was a contact, email glitch then she would have got a copy, his parents, family, coworkers and any one else in his contacts list. lol
7
posted on
11/22/2008 12:34:29 AM PST
by
CanadianMusherinMI
(drill baby drill/mine baby mine!)
To: Stoat
Don't worry; if posting "No thanks."-ed articles got you banned I'd have been gone
This account has been banned or suspended.
To: Slings and Arrows; Stoat
You guys think that THIS might get you banned?
After this last silly season?
LOL!
It’s welcome relief. ;o)
To: 6SJ7; Allegra; ambrose; Bella_Bru; Born Conservative; Cagey; Caipirabob; CarrotAndStick; ...
To: martin_fierro; Slings and Arrows
What I want to know is if those two posters who had just signed up and said they'd had the same "glitch" with their iPhones also had genital pictures "mysteriously" sent by their e-mail accounts. That dang Apple, I tell ya.
If this "glitch" catches on, we could ALL be receiving some very interesting e-mails.
(I'm joking, of course. The best liar in the world probably couldn't come up with {oooops, sorry} a plausible excuse for what this clown got caught doing.)
11
posted on
11/22/2008 1:37:24 AM PST
by
Allegra
To: mkjessup
I really hate to think of what the Starr Report might have been like if Monica Lewinsky had had an iPhone available....
The “blue dress” would have been quickly forgotten......
12
posted on
11/22/2008 1:58:15 AM PST
by
Enchante
(Thanks, Mediascum, you "elected" your candidate and now the country will pay....)
To: dixiechick2000
To: CanadianMusherinMI
She’s certainly not the smartest gal out there, but she was probably desperately trying to hang on to one shred of hope. I don’t get the guy; does he really think women are turned on by images of men pleasuring themselves? A rare few are, I’m sure, but for the most part, women don’t work like that (unlike men viewing similar images of women).
To: CanadianMusherinMI; Stoat; Allegra
She may be dumb, but more likely she is not.
Think of all the people who believed Obama. Plenty of them are stupid and uneducable, but many are very well educated. They didn’t get sucked into the Obama camp overnight. They got there a little at a time.
This woman did, too. A major difference is that this is her husband, not a political candidate. This is the person that she trusts more than anyone else in the world. She took a vow for better or for worse. She can’t just change her vote. She would like to believe him.
Ask yourself this - If you found some mildly suspicious evidence about your spouse, would you immediately run out and file for divorce? Or would you give your spouse the benefit of the doubt and allow him/her to explain?
I think she is behaving in a very intelligent way in a very difficult and bewildering situation. She is actively trying to find out whether this is possible. She is asking all the right questions.
15
posted on
11/22/2008 3:12:09 AM PST
by
generally
(Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
To: Slings and Arrows
From your linked story.
A search of his car uncovered pornography, a home-made sex aid, women's stockings and a Jack Russell terrier.
All that and a jar of pasta sauce too. I do hope the dog wasn't involved.
16
posted on
11/22/2008 3:29:52 AM PST
by
csvset
To: CanadianMusherinMI
He is dumber than a box of rocks since he took the picture. What if he is telling the truth?. She might be as smart as a fox. She did have access to his iPhone and saw the picture. She could have attached it to his email. ;o)
17
posted on
11/22/2008 3:35:42 AM PST
by
seemoAR
To: Welsh Rabbit
I dont get the guy; does he really think women are turned on by images of men pleasuring themselves? A rare few are, Im sure, but for the most part, women dont work like that (unlike men viewing similar images of women). Yeah, I was thinking that the "other woman" in this case must be a real winner. A keeper.
I'd also be willing to bet that she showed the picture to ALL of the other women in the trailer park.
18
posted on
11/22/2008 3:41:09 AM PST
by
PalmettoMason
(Can't we all just get along? At least until I'm finished reloading?)
To: Stoat
Ain’t technology grand. In another 5 years, this idiot will be able to email a hologram of his privates. 3D walk around. Full color.
19
posted on
11/22/2008 4:29:22 AM PST
by
6SJ7
(Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
To: Slings and Arrows
Don't worry; if posting "No thanks."-ed articles got you banned I'd have been gone...."
Slings and Arrows
;)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson