Posted on 10/15/2007 12:25:05 PM PDT by yankeesdoodle
What we concluded, in fact, is that this extraordinary video has the potential to break the TWA Flight 800 case wide open.
The video had been shot from a U.S. Navy P-3 Orion that had been flying almost directly above TWA Flight 800 when it exploded off the coast of Long Island on the night of July 17, 1996. For the record, the P-3 is a long-range, antisubmarine warfare patrol aircraft with advanced submarine detection and avionics equipment.
According to the P-3 crew, all of whom remained stubbornly evasive about their mission when questioned, the plane was flying at 22,000 feet and heading south when the first explosion occurred about a mile away. One unnamed member of the crew was a New York Police Department representative of the NYPD/FBI Joint Task Force – tasked with fighting terrorism in the New York City area.
When the crew members learned of the blast, they promptly circled back over the area for half an hour and offered to help. This video was shot during that period. There is no mistaking the perspective as the
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The hamburglar most likely took that info also from the national archives.
Except in the last paragraph he says:
He is convinced that a missile blew the engine off three miles from where the bulk of the plane descended into the ocean. All evidence supports him, including now, a literal smoking gun, an object with sufficient fuel of its own to still have been burning at least a half hour after the crash. And that object is not likely the engine.
So, what was it? Someone burning a pile of leaves in the back yard? A house fire? some bums at a rail yard gathered around a 55-gallen drum with oily rags? He doesn't say.
Just their souls.
Leaves burning out on the water?
I can’t get it to play. :^( It sounds interesting, though.
Stunning video. What was it?
FLIR in ‘black hot’ mode.
Objects that are black, are hot.
Progressive shades of grey are less hot.
And covered under Clinton's EO.
I wondered about that sentence as well. Could it be a typo in a really “critical” sentence? It just doesn’t fit in with the rest of the paragraph at all.
Is the Secret Service charged with guaranteeing the safety of air traffic in the US?
I could be believe there was a missile but not from this video.
And, if so, who put the typo there? I think it was Soros.
Quite a while ago, there was a very plausible story on a DC radio talk station, which said that if terrorists shot down Flight 800, then the Secret Service (& FAA) could not guarantee the safety of air traffic in the US. Consequently, the President would have to travel by train.
The article didn’t indicate that the burning was in the water.
If it was, then you would have to wonder how it could be the engine, which certainly would have been at the bottom, not on the surface.
And the engine wouldn’t have had enough fuel “self-contained” to leave a slick that would be burning a half hour later, would it?
Maybe I misunderstood the entire article. :-)
Yes, as did Bush rig the World Trade towers to fall.
So the government could get hundreds of other people to shut up and rig all kinds of records, but they can’t control the taking and dissemination of a video from an aircraft they own?
I watched the FLIR footage, there’s nothing there of interest. Order more tinfoil.
What souls? The Clintons sold them long before this TWA incident.
LOL. No conspiracy. Just bad proofreading. That—or I misunderstood the intent of the article.
It wouldn’t be the first time. ;^)
Does anyone else remember that there was a warning from the terrorists that something big was going to happen? And then flight 800. And then that ridiculous little bomb under a park bench at the 1996 Olympics, to make it look like that was what the terrorists meant (supposed perpetrator completely exonerated and in fact suing the people who ruined his life).
The burnig was on the water.
That is obvious from the video, the location of the crash, and the video having been shiot from a P3.
If the burning was on land, there would have been objects visible in it to ID it as being on land, instead there’s all white void, meaning it is on cool water.
It’s FLIR in black hot mode.
Objects in black are hot.
Progressive shades of grey are less hot.
White is cold.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.