[Clint N. Suhks]

Anyone else see a problem here...like an illogical pattern of thinking?

[Responsibility2nd]

Watching Ron Paul last night reminded me of Ross Perot back in ‘92.

Crazy hysterical Texans who don’t have a prayer.

[clamper1797]

What I see is a moonbat liberal disguised as a conservative

[papasmurf]

Are you kidding me?

I stated moths ago that he has serious personality defectS.

In fact, so do mitt and rudy. But Dr. Paul’s is out of control. Did you see his neck veins bursting out last night. LOL

[Right_Rev]

I was for the Constitution before I was against the constitution!

[oblomov]

Yes, this is a contradiction.

[jonrick46]

Running Ron Paul for president is like running Alfred E. Neuman.

[Ramius]

I’m really looking forward to the “Kucinich / Paul” ticket.

Should be a hoot.

[Fudd Fan]

“Aggressive war”

Wonder if RuPaul ever heard of any other kind. Certifiable moonbat wingnut head-case.

[Man50D]

I’m saying we should take our marching orders from our Constitution. We should not go to war — (cheers, applause) — we should not go to war without a declaration.

Here you go Congressman.

Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq

Excerpt

SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the "Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq".

SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS

The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to--

(a) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions applicable to Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and

(b) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.

[hocndoc]

I saw the wagging finger, the loss of control. Guess who that reminded me of?

And I heard him ignore the fact that Congress did authorize force against a tyrant who ignored every restraint “international law” had put on him.

We made a contract with the UN, they put restrictions on Saddam and he continued to kill, to fly where he wanted, and to trade oil for weapons while under sanctions. Libertarians used to understand that fraud is aggression.

[rightwingintelligentsia]

For someone who believes in isolationism, he sure is a fan of “international law.”

[SoCalPol]

The folks on FR supporting L Ron Paul are either stealth DU trolls or mindless drank the kool aid fools.

How the Paulestians can call themselves republicans and be Marxist anti war doesn’t wash

[AuntB]

I’ve been puzzling over this one all day. Citing international law is the opposite of every thing Ron Paul ever preached. Ron Paul has changed.

[Fester Chugabrew]

I hardly consider Ron Paul to be a champion of our enemies and their aims; ememies who cannot begin to fathom a country where people of every faith can live without fear of being persecuted for their faith.

[Petronski]

The problem I see is that it’s false, and probably a lie.

I think he’s perpetrating a fraud on all his silly followers.

[traviskicks]

“it’s illegal under international law”

surely paul mispoke:

(Bill to get US our of UN, introduced by Ron Paul)
http://www.house.gov/paul/legis/106/hr1146.htm