Posted on 08/12/2007 10:38:32 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
“Al’s still sore’s” man on the inside - Hansen, needs to be fined, fired, and forgotten.
GISS and James Hansen have REWRITTEN the data 5 different times now.
The Hadley Centre in the UK (the other big organization tracking global temperatures) has adjusted the data 7 times already. Phil Jones (the main guy at the Hadley Centre who kicked off the 1st of these adjustments in 1990) claims to have lost the original data.
So, you can’t trust these two organizations or anything they have produced. They are warming alarmists through and through and the charts you see of global warming over the past century (0.8C of increase) is made up of 0.7C of “adjustments” and 0.1C of raw data increase.
L
....and good thinking, using the web archived data.
Do you have copies of those pages saved? I wouldn't be surprised if someone couldn't make them disappear.
I should do that.
For later...
For later...
Nice work.....this is getting to be fun!!!
I have no idea what that all means ... so I’ll leave it to the smarter folks to figure it out :0)
What do you make of this?
Note the date on the GISS web page as of today - 8/13/2007 - regarding this subject:
Feb. 8, 2007
...The five warmest years since the late 1880s, according to NASA scientists, are in descending order 2005, 1998, 2002, 2003 and 2006. Credit: NASA
Other groups that study climate change also rank these years as among the warmest, though the exact rankings vary depending upon details of the analyses. Results differ especially in regions of sparse measurements, where scientists use alternative methods of estimating temperature change.
Goddard Institute researchers used temperature data from weather stations on land, satellite measurements of sea surface temperature since 1982 and data from ships for earlier years. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20070208/
It’s a report made that doesn’t reflect current data.
It should be taken down.
I agree. Note that it is supposed to reflect the hottest years on the whole earth - not just the USA.
Also note the faulty sources they used to collect the data in the first place.
Bookmarking for later consideration. Thanks for the ping xcamel!
Bookmarked
In every other case in science, when a reseasrcher is caught publishing fraudulent data, he is quickly and quietly retired from the lab. The capacity for self-policing is considerable.
Why Hansen has not yet received similar treatment is a sad comment.
There is a groupthink mentality in the MSM which forbids contradiction with the environistas.
This story is getting no traction because the NYC outlets do not want it to get traction.
If you do a google search on Hansen and altered data, you only get his 2006 60 minutes (fake but accurate) CBS story.
Ping of interest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.