Posted on 05/25/2007 10:18:53 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly
One of the world's most prestigious health journals has lashed a fast-growing trend in the United States and Britain for "designer vaginas," the tabloid term for cosmetic surgery to the female genitalia.
The fashion is being driven by commercial and media pressures that exploit women's insecurities and is fraught with unknowns, including a risk to sexual arousal, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) says.
Known as elective genitoplasty, the surgery usually entails shortening or changing the shape of the outer lips, or labia, but may also include reduction in the hood of skin covering the clitoris or shortening the vagina itself.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that the practice is spreading fast in the United States as well as in Britain, but the picture is unclear, the BMJ says.
Not only is there a disturbing lack of data about the phenomenon, there has been negligible assessment about surgical after-effects -- and almost zero reflexion as to whether a labial "problem" exists in the first place, the BMJ says angrily.
In 2004-5, 800 "labial reductions" were conducted by Britain's state-run National Health Service (NHS), more than a doubling of the figure of six years earlier. Other operations were carried out by the private sector, although the full figures are unknown.
The authors of the article, London gynaecologist Sarah Creighton and clinical psychologist Lih Mei Liao, conducted their own small-scale probe into why women sought this surgery.
"Our patients sometimes cited restrictions on lifestyle as reasons for their decision," they say.
"These restrictions included inability to wear tight clothing, go to the beach, take communal showers or ride a bicycle comfortably, or avoidance of some sexual practices.
"Men, however, do not usually want the size of their genitals reduced for such reasons. Furthermore, they find alternative solutions for any discomfort arising from rubbing or chaffing of the genitals."
Patients who sought genitoplasty "uniformly" wanted their vulvas to be flat and with no protrusion, similar to the prepubescent look of girls in Western fashion ads, they found.
"Not unlike presenting for a haircut at a salon, women often brought along images to illustrate the desired appearance," say Creighton and Liao. "The illustrations, usually from advertisements or pornography, are always selective and possibly digitally altered."
Plastic surgery to the labia carries risks, for this zone carries nerve fibres that are highly sensitive and are a key pathway of sexual arousal, the article warns sternly.
"Incision to any part of the genitalia could compromise sensitivity," it says.
The BMJ piece suggests genitoplasty is a classic example of where commercial, media and social pressures artificially create a problem, fuel concern over it and then put forward a solution for it.
"There is nothing unusual about protrusion of the labia," it says.
"It is the negative meaning that makes it into a problem -- meanings that can give rise to physical, emotional and behavioural reactions, such as discomfort, self-disgust, perhaps avoidance of some activities and a desire for a surgical fix."
Too funny...
would that be a camel toe, or a moose knuckle?
I’m a vet, what the hell do I know, these women just want to get rid of the camel toe.
Are there any medical links that one could point to which show why this would be something that should be done? I’m being serious now because as I understand it the female genitalia would only be slightly modified so it wouldn’t show possibily through tight jeans or something like that. Perhaps this is the reason it is being done. I’m sorta curious why it might be done. Evidently there is a market for its procedure. I have seen some tight fitting swimware that appeared to be rather graphic (leaving little to the imagination) although covered. That’s why I ask the question.
I love that book.
FIRKIN: A small tub for butter. The author has nothing to say about this word other than to point out that the world awaits the poet who can successfully rhyme 'firkin', 'gherkin' and 'merkin' in the one work.
But many don't buy into any of this garbage and don't have all these stupid insecurities and get very tired of being lumped in with those who do.
Let me clarify to say “elective” plastic surgery.
There are whole shows on ABC, E!, and Fox that play up this notion of redesigning your whole body with elective plastic surgery.
I’d like to see these contestants 10 years after.
I do not understand "Elective" plastic surgery. I am no beauty queen. I wish I was, but alas I am not. So, I deal with it. Being ugly is not all that bad....
That spinal fusion surgery sounds painful by the description itself! How are you doing now?
The disk was pressing my sciatic nerve to the point i was in constant chronic pain, and losing the use of my left leg. It had to be done and i am glad it worked.
(Listen to how Peter Wolf of J.Geils pronounces the last word.)
Thank goodness you’re doing alright!
You’ve always been a purist.
As møøselimbs practice it, genital mutilation removes all the nerve endings and sensitive structures so that a little girl will grow up to be a woman who never ever has an orgasm.
This levels the playing field for møøselimb men who are apparently grossly deficient in the ability to please a woman department.
Does anyone maintain a “Friday Thread of the Week” Ping List?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.