Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duncan Who ?
2-14-07 | rodomila

Posted on 02/14/2007 7:28:54 PM PST by rodomila

I used to think Free Republic was a site with mostly rational people. I can't understand why so many of you waste your time with Duncan Hunter fantasies. Really folks hallucinogenic drugs are illegal and bad for you too. Stop taking them !!! No one outside of the Hunter family and this website thinks he has the remotest chance of being elected President. The Ronald Reagan comparisons are idiotic. Reagan had been a two term Governor of the largest state in the nation. He had been a national household name for over 40 years when he ran in 1980. God only made one Ronald Reagan. Duncan Hunter, although he is a solid Congressman, is no Ronald Reagan. I'm a conservative and I would love to have a viable conservative to work for this election cycle. But we don't have one. McCain is a no go for me. I loathe the treacherous man and believe he is non-compos mentis (loony). That leaves Mitt and Rudy. Newt's entry would hopefully pull the other two to the right (which would be great), and he might even win the nomination (which would probably be bad as I don't think he would win the general election).

That would leave us with Hildebeast or even worse B. Hussein Obama. Therefore, although I'm pro-life, pro-gun, and anti the mainstreaming of homosexuality, I am trying to decide between Rudy and Mitt.

For me the war on islamo nazi psychos is the top issue and Rudy gets my vote on that one.

Issue two is finding a candidate who won't give in to global warming hysteria because that is the lefties preferred path currently to world government and destruction of our economic system. I have to look into Mitt's position on this because Rudy made some rather discouraging comments on this recently (although they were not as bad as originally reported here.)

Next is immigration. We need someone to enforce our laws and get control of the borders. Mitt seems to the right of Rudy on this but both have a way to go. Maybe Tancredo in the race can generate some movement.

Taxes - we need to keep the Bush tax cuts at the very minimum and hopefully get a bolder overhaul of the system.

Judges - we want young Scalias.

Spending restraint - I'm hoping that both, as successful businessmen, will hold the line on spending better than GWB who was a total disappointment in this area.

Let's try to move the viable candidates closer to us on the issues rather than engage in self defeating fantasies of "ideal" candidates who no one has ever heard of and who have never run any larger organization than a Congressman's staff.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2008election; duncanhunter; guiliani; hunter; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-373 next last
To: Lakeshark

LOL


121 posted on 02/14/2007 8:44:16 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Howlin; Mo1
Yall be good, I need to hit the hay.

Like I said, this is going to be a long year and a half, so get ready to hang in there.

122 posted on 02/14/2007 8:47:53 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

They're just class all the way, aren't they? /sarcasm


123 posted on 02/14/2007 8:52:41 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Good night, Lakeshark. Really GOOD to see you!


124 posted on 02/14/2007 8:54:16 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
Hunter supporter: Rudy's a gun-grabbing, wife-cheating, gay-lovin', baby-killing liberal! I'll never support him, and if you support him you're a liberal Rino too! The Hunter folks seem hell-bent on dividing this group. Maybe they're really D plants? :-)

The tone and language of these people (enraged, nasty, vicious, lots of name-calling) is familiar - reminiscent of the Buchanan Brigades.

125 posted on 02/14/2007 8:54:40 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
The tone and language of these people (enraged, nasty, vicious, lots of name-calling) is familiar - reminiscent of the Buchanan Brigades.

That's an interesting observation, yes indeed.

Honestly, I think this is much ado about nothing. Just some folks throwing a temper tantrum. :-D

126 posted on 02/14/2007 8:56:17 PM PST by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: rodomila

Eye thenk I hav. Occasionally.


127 posted on 02/14/2007 9:02:22 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: rodomila
>>>Therefore, although....<<<

That's the problem right there. Rudy and McCain don't fit the bill. Abortion and homosexuality have ZERO place in the Republican Party. So therefore, although, HELL NO!

Although I am pro-life, pro-gun, anti-homosex agenda and more conservative than ever, I am still nearly two years away from voting for the next POTUS. Just like everybody else.

Barry Obsama just got a bazillion dollars worth of free MSM.
It seems to me that Duncan Hunter is at least putting in the time and effort in the good old-fashioned way. That still counts with some people.
128 posted on 02/14/2007 9:20:05 PM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodomila
We, of the Duncan Hunter crowd, have news for you...


You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we say in Texas, I'll bet you couldn't pour p!ss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You're a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon. You are a bleating foal, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done. I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell? Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly. You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot. And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile, one-handed, slack-jawed, drooling, meatslapper. On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go. You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock. You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill. You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go away. I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid, so stupid it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh. The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn't really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative post was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been "right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.
129 posted on 02/14/2007 9:21:57 PM PST by Issaquahking (Pardon Compean and Ramos Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr

*Crickets*


130 posted on 02/14/2007 9:27:08 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: rodomila
There are a lot of reasons to believe that Duncan is and will remain a long shot, chiefly the fact that he has no executive experience and Americans strongly prefer presidential candidates who have executive experience.

That doesn't mean Duncan should be treated with contempt. He is a deeply principled conservative and decent man. If he does nothing more than shape the debate and drive the other candidates more to the right, he will be a godsend.

131 posted on 02/14/2007 9:31:26 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

You got an insect infestation?


132 posted on 02/14/2007 9:34:55 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

LOL!


133 posted on 02/14/2007 9:37:20 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: rodomila

Get over yourself. There is a primary for a reason and people can come to their own conclusions and support and vote for whomever they chose. I seriously question you when you are trying to convince us that we have to settle for Mitt or Rudy.


134 posted on 02/14/2007 9:40:01 PM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Yeah, and yet YOU continue to concern yourself with any discussion of Hunter. You're a contradiction like the Rudy you are trying to peddle to conservatives as our great savior.


135 posted on 02/14/2007 9:42:33 PM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rodomila

Whoever does end up as the GOP's final choice for President in '08 will be better overall as a candidate from all of the "political beatings and abuses" that they will have endured prior to being chosen as the final candidate.


136 posted on 02/14/2007 9:44:53 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodomila

We're months out from many even starting to care and focus on the next presidential election. Not everybody is like folks here on FR and discussing this already.

You may be right that Duncan Hunter doesn't have a chance. Who knows? As other posters have pointed out, there have been other candidates who became president who came out of nowhere, like Clinton. I think it's still too early to tell.

(Hallucinogenic drugs? No, dear, you're thinking of the other political party's site.)


137 posted on 02/14/2007 9:46:33 PM PST by Theresawithanh (Don't be rediki... riducke...rudicki...stoopid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodomila

"I can't understand why so many of you waste your time with Duncan Hunter fantasies. Really folks hallucinogenic drugs are illegal and bad for you too. Stop taking them !!! "

Here's the real question for discussion.

Seems to me you have a problem starting a discussion that doesn't start out insulting your potential allies. With that statement right there you lost any credibility you may have created.

Good job, you just made sure that I for one will never ever support any of those candidates you think are viable.


138 posted on 02/14/2007 9:49:42 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodomila

I will never vote for a gun-grabber. Never. It's not rational.


139 posted on 02/14/2007 9:50:08 PM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr; M. Thatcher

If pointing out that Rudy's stances more than anything are mostly liberal and on KEY issues is name-calling, why don't you people think of what YOU are saying about YOUR candidate! Obviously something's not right there.


140 posted on 02/14/2007 9:53:22 PM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-373 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson