Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Go Bust: A turncoat narc offers tips on how to move your weed
The Dallas Observer ^ | 2/1/2007 | Keith Plocek

Posted on 02/09/2007 5:47:22 PM PST by ccmay

He looks like a good cop. He's got the 'stache, the short-cropped hair, the pushed-out chest and the shiny badge. He sounds like a good cop too; drawled and official. He's got a TV reporter's microphone in his face and a brick of marijuana in his hand, and he's answering questions—not in the "I just accidentally Tasered an old lady" kind of way, but with a grin of accomplishment. The total bust was in the neighborhood of 275 pounds.

This is the old Barry Cooper. Top cop. Total prick. He claims more than 300 felony drug arrests during his eight years as an officer in Gladewater, Big Sandy and Odessa, and a former supervisor says he was damn good at his job, even if he doesn't agree with Cooper's latest get-rich idea.

The video cuts to a decade later, a few months ago. "That was me, Barry Cooper," he says, "top narcotics officer." His hair is longer. That 'stache is now a full-on goatee. The top cop has become a dude. "I'm going to show you places that I never found marijuana hidden." He talks with his hands, like a mellowed-out P.T. Barnum. "I'm going to teach you exactly how narcotic-detector dogs are trained, and I'm going to answer that age-old question: Do coffee grounds really work?"

It's quite the pitch: Former drug warrior sees the light, goes to the dark side and makes a video, Never Get Busted Again, with shady tips on how to fool the fuzz. Stoners rejoice. The new beginning of the end of prohibition is near.

"The drug war is a failed policy, and the legal side effects on the families are worse than the drugs," Cooper says. "I was so wrong in the things I did back then. I ruined lives."

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Gardening
KEYWORDS: 2sick4words; 420; bongbrigade; drugs; drugsruinlives; govwatch; haveyouseen; juniorsgrades; leo; libertarians; marijuana; normal; police; rollanotherone; soros; wod; yourkidsondrugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: dfwgator

The same people who are spending billions and billions to fight the WOD now. Sending money and troops to Columbia, patrolling the skies and oceans, prisons, courts, police, and collateral damage are very expensive!!!


81 posted on 02/12/2007 3:48:31 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
"Turncoat Narc"...

Isn't that redundant???

82 posted on 02/12/2007 3:50:10 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

Not everywhere. Some places get filled up. No doubt that if you really want help and try for a few days you'll find it, but not as easily as you describe."

So, what programs did you go through?


83 posted on 02/12/2007 7:10:25 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7
manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within,

That says nothing about putting it into my body.

Nice try.

L

84 posted on 02/12/2007 10:28:30 PM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
That's just a pathetic response and intellectually dishonest. If you can't own it, or make it, or move it -- guess what? You can't use it. And when the police raided a speakeasy, they never arrested any of the patrons? Grow up.

You know, it's one thing to be against something, but you don't get to lie to further your belief.

The Constitution says that me and a good majority can write any damn law we please, whether you like it or not.
85 posted on 02/12/2007 11:49:35 PM PST by johnmark7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7
The Constitution says that me and a good majority can write any damn law we please, whether you like it or not.

So you could pass a law to force Jews to wear yellow stars on their clothing?

L

86 posted on 02/12/2007 11:58:20 PM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7
The Constitution says that me and a good majority can write any damn law we please,

So you and your 'majority' could make going to a Baptist Church a Federal crime?

So you and your 'majority' could make petitioning my government for a redress of greivances a crime?

So you and your 'majority' could force me to quarter Federal troops in my home at my own expense?

So you and your 'majority' could make it legal to torture anyone you felt like torturing?

So you and your 'majority' could force me to testify against myself?

The only thing that's apparent here is that the majority of your 'majority' are idiots. And that includes the fool who pretends to be speaking for them right now.

L

87 posted on 02/13/2007 12:20:58 AM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Not too long and very interesting. Why do people have a problem with him making money off of the fight against the WOD? Most of the LEO's involved are making money off of it, judges, politicians, et. al.
Maybe capitalism will be an effective tool in regaining our lost liberties.


88 posted on 02/13/2007 11:57:37 AM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

With choices come consequences...I know that drug addicts don't have a lot of money at their disposal. You weren't looking for treatment for addicts, you were looking for treatment for addicts at the expense of those who are not addicts...gumment paid. If I don't believe in subsidized treatment for drunks, why would I believe in subsidized treatment for crackheads?

What addicts do is either my business, or not...if it's not my business, it's not my problem. I have no interest in subsidizing a lifestyle I recognize as destructive. If an addict has the right to drink/smoke/shoot up/whatever, then they have the right to lay in the ditch until they feel better, or die.

You don't get it. You are already paying for it. You are paying for all of the people in jail for nonviolent drug offenses that carry mandatory minimum sentences (taking the place of guys like John Couey and other Pedophiles).

You are already subsidizing the lifestyle of those involved in the drug trade, not the addicts but the dealers at the higher levels. You are paying through the nose in taxes to support the govt's efforts to enforce the black market monopoly on the narcotics trade.

You pay also, and most expensively by having your individual liberties chipped away, day by day, year by year.

Ask yourself this. Why do we not get tax credits or rebates when the police seize millions of drug dollars? Where does that money go? What do they do with the drugs they confiscate and where do they get the drugs to set up sting operations? When is the WOD supposed to end, what defines success, will our civil liberties be returned once the WOD is successful? What other "Wars" is our govt. involved in that are evolving along the same lines?


89 posted on 02/13/2007 12:05:48 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ccmay



90 posted on 02/13/2007 12:10:22 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7

Half the 16,000 murders in the USA last year went unsolved. Why do we even bother when the effort is such a waste?

And rapes? Geez, there must have been hundreds of thousands that never even got reported.

More of these crimes would be solved if LEO resources were freed up from the WOD. Less of these crimes would be committed if jail cells weren't occupied by nonviolent drug offendors under mandatory minimum sentencing.


91 posted on 02/13/2007 12:23:47 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The drug has never killed anyone and there's no proof that it causes long-term damage to someone.

You think there's an obesity "epidemic" now...

(do I really need the /sarcasm tag here folks?)

92 posted on 02/13/2007 12:28:33 PM PST by GOP_Raider (Hated by all NFL fans since 1990.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7
Half the 16,000 murders in the USA last year went unsolved.

How many of them were related to the trade in illegal drugs?

93 posted on 02/13/2007 12:32:43 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7

While you're at it. legalize prostitution.

That's an excellent idea!


94 posted on 02/13/2007 12:51:44 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Half the 16,000 murders in the USA last year went unsolved.
How many of them were related to the trade in illegal drugs?


How many of those wouldn't have occurred if recreational drugs weren't soley supplied by a black market monopoly?
Put another way, how many times have you heard a report about the Budwieser and Henieken representatives shooting it out over turf, or how many turf wars erupt into violence by reps from Abbott labs and Phizer?


95 posted on 02/13/2007 1:02:32 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster
Please see post #46.

There's no good answer. For me the cost outweighed the benefit on the WOD when asset forfeiture became commonplace. I don't care how great the need or noble the cause...due process is a constitutional right.

The only possibly worse answer is offering free treatment and decriminalizing drug use. Everyone with the benefit of hindsight can see the cost of the Great Society programs, the "war on poverty." We finally pulled the plug because of the $$$ cost; not only were the programs much more expensive than predicted, they created an increasing demand for the services.

We haven't totally counted the human cost. We now have a whole generation of welfare recipients, for example, possibly second and third generation, who are for all intents and purposes incapable of functioning as adults. We have a generation of young men who will never be employable. This was done with the best of intentions, but with little or no foresight.

Politicians believe there's no law they can't amend, but they've had little success on the law of unintended consequences. These results were easily predictable, and were predicted by some. They were assaulted as being mean-spirited and judgmental. Sound familiar? It should.

There's no shortage of politicians whose ambition outpaces their understanding...and plenty of do-gooders whose good intentions outweigh their judgment.

This is a minefield of unintended consequences. If I could support any change it would be to decriminalize, along with a philosophy...you are free to make bad choices, but we will do our best to see that the consequences are borne by you alone.

96 posted on 02/13/2007 1:46:21 PM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster
how many turf wars erupt into violence by reps from Abbott labs and Phizer?

Hey, don't mess with those Pfizer boys. They will jack you up.

97 posted on 02/13/2007 2:09:34 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Obie Wan

Overdose of marijuana? How amazing. Must be the first case ever. Are they going to write it up in the New England Journal of Medicine or the Lancet?


98 posted on 02/13/2007 2:16:52 PM PST by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Meth is the biggest drug problem this country is facing right now. That should be the focus.


99 posted on 02/13/2007 2:20:42 PM PST by Vicki (Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents or anyone just passing through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicki
Meth is the biggest drug problem this country is facing right now. That should be the focus.

I fully agree. As I said on another thread, I'm in favor of legalization of marijuana, decriminalization and medicalization of most hard drugs, and public hanging for methamphetamine dealers.

-ccm

100 posted on 02/13/2007 3:08:17 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson