Skip to comments.
Indicators of False Accusations (DukeLAX - LieStoppers)
LieStoppers ^
| 11/28/2006
| LieStoppers 'staff'
Posted on 11/28/2006 6:02:52 AM PST by Ready4Freddy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
6.
The report of rape is not seen by false claimants as requiring collateral reports of oral or anal sex, unless such acts are included in the persons sexual repertoire.
OK, I just thought that this one was funny... ;>)
To: TommyDale; abb
2
posted on
11/28/2006 6:03:43 AM PST
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: Ready4Freddy
I think the Durham Duke Dancing Duo has a lot of acts in their "repertoire".
3
posted on
11/28/2006 6:04:52 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: Ready4Freddy
Why is this case still going on...
To: Ready4Freddy
This training manual is designed, primarily, to discourage law enforcement agencies and officers from viewing allegations of sexual assault from a perspective of suspicion that accusations are often unfounded or false.
IOW, all defendants are guilty until proven innocent.
5
posted on
11/28/2006 6:08:56 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: abner; Alia; AmishDude; AntiGuv; beyondashadow; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; bwteim; ...
6
posted on
11/28/2006 6:12:56 AM PST
by
abb
(The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
To: JamesP81
No, I think it's appropriate that LE take all allegations seriously, but also crucial that they critically compare the allegation to other evidenciary aspects. The 29 indicators are offered as a way to effect that critical comparison.
IOW, all defendants are guilty until proven innocent.
7
posted on
11/28/2006 6:18:12 AM PST
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: abb
Chalmers' daughter indicted in assault
From Staff Reports, N&O, Nov 28, 2006 12:30 AM
DURHAM - A grand jury indicted the daughter of Durham's police chief
Monday in a felony assault case. Stefanie Chalmers, 26, was charged
in June with assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury in connection
with an incident in April.
Authorities say Chalmers hit a woman with a motor vehicle.
The case against Chalmers, the daughter of Durham Police Chief Steve Chalmers,
is being prosecuted by the state Attorney General's Office.
Her attorney, James "Butch" Williams, said he could not comment on specifics
of the case. "I'm looking forward to vigorously defending this action," he said.
http://www.newsobserver.com/145/story/515346.html
8
posted on
11/28/2006 6:20:20 AM PST
by
xoxoxox
To: xoxoxox
9
posted on
11/28/2006 6:21:44 AM PST
by
abb
(The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
To: Ready4Freddy
No, I think it's appropriate that LE take all allegations seriously, but also crucial that they critically compare the allegation to other evidenciary aspects.
I seriously doubt that's what this group wants. Also consider that a DA can get an indictment against a ham sandwich. All a vengeful girlfriend has to do to railroad a man out of house and home is make a sexual abuse accusation, and he'll literally have to mortgage his house to pay for the lawyers. Also figure in that an accuser's name is never made public (whatever happened to facing your accuser in an open court of law?) such allegations tend to destroy lives even if the accused is acquitted. This is one of the several reasons the present justice garners absolutely no respect.
10
posted on
11/28/2006 6:27:01 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: xoxoxox
The case against Chalmers, the daughter of Durham Police Chief Steve Chalmers, is being prosecuted by the state Attorney General's Office.
Why isn't Nifong prosecuting this case?!?
11
posted on
11/28/2006 6:35:13 AM PST
by
maggief
To: JamesP81
Curious that they included the appendix of Indicators and Investigation of False Allegations, isn't it?
I seriously doubt that's what this group wants
12
posted on
11/28/2006 6:42:02 AM PST
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: Ready4Freddy
Curious that they included the appendix of Indicators and Investigation of False Allegations, isn't it?
It's called PR. They don't want to look too extreme after all.
When someone comes out with a pamphlet along the lines of 'Policing With Respect to a Citizen's Inalienable Constitutional Rights' then I'll be impressed.
13
posted on
11/28/2006 6:44:29 AM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: maggief
No indication in the article as to where the assault took place (other than the dateline). 'tis curious, tho, isn't it? I guess someone decided that the Nifong/Chalmers axis was a bit too... incestuous.
14
posted on
11/28/2006 6:45:49 AM PST
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: Ready4Freddy
The only critter on earth lower than a rapist,is a critter who makes a false accusation of rape. Unless it's a DA who prosecutes while knowing the charges are false.
15
posted on
11/28/2006 6:46:24 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a title that pisses you off more.)
To: Ready4Freddy
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=triangle&id=4301236
(06/23/06 - DURHAM) - Stefanie Chalmers ended up in handcuffs Tuesday in connection with an incident that happened two-months ago leaving some people to wonder if the police chief's daughter is getting special treatment.
It appears that's not the case for Stefanie Chalmers the daughter of Durham's Police Chief, Steve Chalmers.
She was a no-show in traffic court on Thursday for a handicap parking violation. Just a few days before, she was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon for an incident that happened two months ago on North Roxboro Street.
(snip)
16
posted on
11/28/2006 6:56:02 AM PST
by
maggief
To: maggief
"The case against Chalmers, the daughter of Durham
Police Chief Steve Chalmers, is being prosecuted by
the state Attorney General's Office.
Why isn't Nifong prosecuting this case?!?"
Conflict of interest? Notice Butch Williams has the
case. This was where she tried to run someone over
in a parking lot. The warrants went missing for months.
Then this summer Chief Chalmers and City Manager
Baker signed a sweetheart retirement package.
Eighteen months to hang on and retire on a fat pension.
All the while taking care of his sick mother and doing
city business on his Rasberry. If this doesn't smell
like a 'conspiracy' then we've been in the cesspool
too long.
17
posted on
11/28/2006 7:05:38 AM PST
by
xoxoxox
To: xoxoxox
(Roy A. Cooper, III) was elected North Carolina Attorney General in November 2000 and took office on January 6, 2001; he was re-elected for a second term in 2004. Cooper was mentioned as a possible Democratic candidate for North Carolina governor, but he has decided to run for re-election as Attorney General in 2008, instead. [1] The current governor, Mike Easley, succeeded to the post of governor after serving as state attorney general.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_A._Cooper
//
A bit off topic:
http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=3178
18
posted on
11/28/2006 7:25:35 AM PST
by
maggief
To: JamesP81; Ready4Freddy
While I agree that a group like this is highly ideological, it's possible, just possible, that they understand that every claim of rape that's proven to be false damages every future true claim of rape.
To: All
20
posted on
11/28/2006 8:17:08 AM PST
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson