Posted on 11/03/2006 4:36:25 PM PST by SmithL
How can a naked man be suspected of indecent exposure.
It all depends on what is is.
There was another thread about this that got pulled.
Thinking about this, even with latex gloves, I think I'd have the fire department take care of this...wouldn't want to be sued for rectal damage to this loon. You still call them 220's up there? Of course somebody would show up with a camera and claim you were sodomizing the guy with a screwdriver.
What is it with Walgreens? I've got 2 shoplift arrests there in the last two months at one location and the Bartell's down the street is no better. They've been fairly sharp here catching them
Lying on a stump, naked, whacking it while getting a screwdriver up his a**........hmmmm.............He's perfectly sane; just simulating what it'd be like if the Dems took over Congress is all.
In 1955 one man who was "feeling depressed" reportedly inserted a six-inch paper tube into his rectum, dropped in a lighted firecracker, and blew a hole in his anterior rectal wall.
I'd prefer Prozac.
On the other hand, his previous woes suddenly became quite minor.
Hey, it's all a matter of perspective. ;o)
Because there is 'good naked' and 'bad naked.'
Y'know, has anyone raised the thought that this might be not so much a weapon as a defense against anal rape?
Think about it. (Or don't...)
He must have just forgot that it was there. I know that's the first place I look when I misplace my glasses...
HA! Thank you . . . LOL!
BTW, sorry for no-show, am still here, mostly lurking.
Regards to Monkey Face and Jet Jaguar.
Also check Sound Politics regularly . . . voting tomorrow.
Thanks again, Norski
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.