Enough braying
slick is a punk that has no moral compass, and gutted the military while I served. He is a pathetic excuse for a man, and even more pathetic as a President.
"You'll try? You'll try? Losers try. Winners go home and f$ the prom queen." Sean Connery from "The Rock".
bump
No mention whatsoever of the multiple offers by the Sudan and others of OBLs head on a platter that Slick turned down; then an interview with a "Clinton WH insider" who informs us all that nobody worked harder to kill OBL than the Slickster himself.
As it became obvious there would be no rebuttal from normal people, I started channel surfing and landed on VH1, which showed an edited version of the interview, again, completely complimentary to BC, followed by this "analysis": "Don't mess with Bill."
Gotta love the media.
Unfortunately for the country, littledickbill didn't blow prematurely enough, say, in 1992 (and again in 1996).
Or maybe he did, and we just didn't hear about it because Fox was still in it's infancy and the MSM ruled.
Excellent article as usual Bray.
End of story.
Eight years wasted.
I loved this. Very cleverly written and so frighteningly true!
BJ spewed his "Presidue" all over....it was an ugly sight....what an IMMATURE manboy trailer trash hissy fit.
Only a 4? Dang. I wanna see a 10. I'd like to see a Hillary 10 caught on tape, too. A sight to behold, I'm sure.
But, Chris Wallace disputes that. Wallace, interviewd by Bill O'Reilly tonight, said that the Toons' handlers were trying to get the interview stopped.
Wallace said that after the interview, Klintoon was yelling at his people.
Just putting aside the issue of whether Clinton could've apprehended UBL or not, Gingrich and others are making very valid points as to why Clinton's attempt at a war on terror was a failure. That this administration engaged in the DoD/Intel cutbacks that it did...at a time when terrorism was on the rise, was just outrageous.
As I listened to a Democrat congressman's solution to some of these problems today--claiming we needed to put our own spies in these terrorists tents, I couldn't help but laugh since it was these same Democrats (especially Robert Toricelli) that instituted laws that forbid our Intel agencies from allying with unsavory characters.
Clinton probably doesn't even realize this, but his interview exposed for all to see the danger that a president poses when he doesn't make the proper appointments. As Gingrich noted, all the liberal lawyers that infested his administration created the very policies that treated terrorism as criminal acts rather than acts of war.
Before Gorelick was at DOJ constructing her "Wall" she was a chief council within the DoD, were she helped enact policies that required lawyers to first approve any acts of aggression. Before any order to attack UBL was executed, it first had to be vetted by lawyers at DoD. While Clinton tries to pass the buck to others he claims were responsible for these failures, he still has to take responsibility for those he put in the positions to make those decisions. And if what others have said is true, these positions were filled with people whom Clinton expected to protect him from his Chinese connection and other nefarious dealings.
From the Church Commission to the Toricelli Amendment to the Gorelick Wall, the Democrats have deconstructed what was once a very capable intelligence agency. They've literally put their own personal "civil liberties" above the civil liberties of others...and our national security. This was evident the moment Clinton stepped foot in office and created his own "wall" of protection when he fired all the federal DA's (DA Massacre) and Inspector Generals...and replaced them with incompetent, partisan hacks.
Well said !!!!!
I was uncomfortable....for you....reading parts of it.
Nevertheless, the points you make are indisputable.