Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia - 2006 Update
The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia Web Site ^ | September 1, 2006 | Jeff Head

Posted on 09/01/2006 6:36:27 PM PDT by Jeff Head


The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia 2006 Update

I have been keeping a major web site up regarding the growth of the Chinese NAvy for the last four years. This is the 2006 Update.

Throughout 2005 and 2006 the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has continued its unprecedented modernization and buildup, working on and procuring twelve seperate classes of major combatants. Increasing numbers of new guided missile destroyers, guided missile frigates, fast attack craft, very modern and quiet diesel/electric attack submarines, nuclear attack submarines, nuclear ballistic missile submarines, logisitic support craft, amphibious assault craft, and the infrastructure and aircraft to support them are being built. The PLAN has now settled on several classes of vessels to be built in serial production after several years of testing and evaluation of initial production runs of two each of those vessels.

By way of comparison, since 2000, the Chinese Navy has added an additional 72 new, major combatants...a net growth of 72 major combatants. In that same time the US Navy has built 39 major new combatants, but also decommissioned 45 major combatants, most of them with ten or more years service life remaining in them according to their original construction plans, for a net of -8 major combatants.

Now, while the overall numbers, technology, and strategies are still signifcantly in favor of the US Navy, the trend is disconcerting because future construction plans call for projecting similar trends.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: armsrace; dragonsfuryseries; freeperjeffhead; navalbuildup; plan; prc; redchinanavy; redchinathreat; redchinese; redseadragon; usnavy; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Jeff Head

Your take on their intentions are spot on IMO. Gonna hafta get ahold of your books one of these days. I appreciate your longevity and the "meat" in your posts.


21 posted on 09/01/2006 7:43:23 PM PDT by jeremiah (Our military are not "fodder", but fathers and mothers and sons and daughters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: vincentjay
"China is building up military forces and setting up bases along sea lanes from the Middle East to project its power overseas and protect its oil shipments, according to a previously undisclosed internal report prepared for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld...."

I believe this is essentially correct. They are doing exactly what the Japanese did in the 1930s, knowing they need the oil and trying to secure the supply, both by sea and by land.

At some point, that need and desire will conflict with us and they know it and are preparing for it. Maybe over Taiwan, maybe over the Spratley's, maybe in conjunction with their relationship with some one like Iran or N. Korea.

22 posted on 09/01/2006 7:44:40 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
Thanks. You can download the entire thing for free (the entire Dragon's Fury Series) as an adobe ebook at the following site.

FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD.

I just ask folks if they like the ebook, then to tell other people and also to consider getting the printed book after you have read the ebook and like it.

23 posted on 09/01/2006 7:48:54 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I believe the Red Chinese are very carefully and willfully pulling the strings behind the scenes in the WOT with Iran, and with N. Korea...

Precisely! The Russians are working on wearing us down as well, using the proxy of the terrorist groups of the middle east and supporting (with materiel) those groups.

This way our forces get worn out, our supplies expended, and maybe even our government changed to one which will be more amenable to their goals (like the Clintons).

24 posted on 09/01/2006 7:51:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; All
Jeff, All... Let me throw some conjecture out for consideration.

I too have puzzled about this Chinese buildup and our downsizing. Everyone, including me, is looking at this situation based on what they have read in history, their personnel experience and the wars we have lived through during our lives.

I decided to try thinking "outside of the box" and here is what I would like to throw out for consideration and discussion:

Our military technology is being developed 20-30 in advance of what we currently deploy. Suppose we currently have some technologies developed that will make a major revolution in warfare capabilities and change the strategy of how we fight a war.

Add to the mix, the developing technology that is close to being finalized and you might have a reason for the lack of our response to the Chinese buildup.

So it comes down to this in my little fantasy of conjecture: Rummy and crew are watching the Reds do their buildup and smiling while programing for the new targets they are getting. This could be one of those periods of time where there is a major turn of developments in warfare. Something like the "A" Bomb in recent history.

Just being optimistic and throwing out a different slant here. Taking off my tinfoil now...
25 posted on 09/01/2006 8:13:17 PM PDT by cibco (Xin Loi! Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cibco
We do have amazing technology, both now building on the ways and on the drawing board. The Metal Storm technology (which I have deployed as Hail Storm weaponry in my novels, directed energy weapons, etc.

But the Chinese are not sitting still either. They are a very vibrant economy and have a lot of bright minds. As they continue to have more and more money to throw at the issue, the technology race will be just as critical as the arms race itself.

26 posted on 09/01/2006 8:16:52 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thank you.


27 posted on 09/01/2006 8:39:28 PM PDT by jeremiah (Our military are not "fodder", but fathers and mothers and sons and daughters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: vincentjay
"China is building up military forces and setting up bases along sea lanes from the Middle East to project its power overseas and protect its oil shipments..."

My thoughts as well. They get most of their oil from the Middle East while the US only gets about 17% of its imported oil from the Persian Gulf and that percentage is projected to decrease for the US in the future. Perhaps that is why we are not taking a harder stance against Iran. In 10-15 years, that part of the world may not be that strategically important to us, but it will be to the Chinese. The great irony is that the Chinese will then be facing a nuclear armed Iran, Pakistan & India for control of the region at a time when all 4 nations will be at state of industrialization where they will all need as much oil as they can get their hands on.

Meanwhile, big oil companies like Chevron & Exxon are currently partnering with Indian companies to build huge refineries along the coasts of India. One such project is currently employing over 150,000 people and is projected to take 2 years just to finish the 1st phase! Let China & India fight it out with mad mullahs while we deploy our forces closer to home.

28 posted on 09/01/2006 9:04:00 PM PDT by Left2Right ("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cibco

Even without the new weapons, wouldn't JDAM's do a number on surface ships? If we can easily hit small buildings, wouldn't a much larger ship, even if it's moving, make an easy target also? Taiwan could be defended with just a few hundred of those JDAM kits to upgrade their current bombs.


29 posted on 09/01/2006 9:07:22 PM PDT by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LenS

You have a very good point there. That's why I think we can consider beyond that.


30 posted on 09/01/2006 9:24:26 PM PDT by cibco (Xin Loi! Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
America seems to becoming socialist faster than China is becoming capitalist.. Looks to me like both China and the U.S. are both persueing the capitalism of socialism.. Which is what most socialists have always persued.. Both heading toward globalism.. from different directions..

Barring a revolution in THIS country it is probably going to happen too.. How?... 30 million(or more) legal and illegal aliens voting are going to make it happen.. whether amnestyied or not..

31 posted on 09/01/2006 9:34:23 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Thank you, I don't have to tell them, they are seeing the light. I have a grandson that has agreed with me for some time.

The son that disagreed with me so vehemently, he is a history buff. He has begun to question China. He does agree with Bush and very seldom condemns him.

It takes many of us years to change our views. Me, I can be persuaded by facts.
32 posted on 09/01/2006 9:46:03 PM PDT by frannie (Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LenS
JDAM is a land-attack weapon that employs an upgrade to the tail surfaces on free-fall bombs. At high altitude it has a range of maybe 15 miles, which is well within the range of Anti-air on the major ships it might attack.

In addition, guiding JDAM against a moving target would be difficult because it is not radar guided or heat guided...it is GPS guided. In addition, the CEP for the JDAM is something like 13 meters. The Navy is trying to improve that to 3 meters, but that is still against stationary targets.

The HARM (AGM-88), SLAM-ER (AGM-84K), the Penguin (AGM-119B), the Maverick (AGM-65), and the Standard (SM-2) missiles are what we have in inventory to attack ships with...of course in addition to our torpedoes from our submarines. missile

33 posted on 09/02/2006 1:21:37 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
"Thank you Richard Nixon"

During the late 1940's and through the 1950's Senator and then Vice President Nixon was viewed as a anti-communist champion, fighting the good fight against Red China and then in the early 1970's President Nixon opens the door.

We were told 'they will change their ways' do to western influences.

To this day the communist dictatorship is still in control and growing more alarming thanks to the billions rolling in from the West.

34 posted on 09/02/2006 3:50:58 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola
To this day the communist dictatorship is still in control and growing more alarming thanks to the billions rolling in from the West.

I agree. Their totalitarian form of voernment has not changed, they've just adapted their economic model to avoid what the Soviets experienced...and what they were already experiencing at the time.

Now, with their more fascists model for economics, they represent a threat, IMHO, an order of magnitude greater than Nazi Germany of the 1930s. When you couple their growing world-wide influence, their growing military, and the radical Islamofascist threat, the situation is very acute.

...and , as you say, we are funding it.

35 posted on 09/02/2006 8:41:09 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks for the ping


36 posted on 09/02/2006 11:40:48 AM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Think about all those COSCO container ships bringing all those Chinese goodies you buy at WAL*MART.

There must be thousands.

How long do you suppose it would take to unload the containers and turn those into transport ships - or even missile platforms?

Don't think for a minute Chinese don't think this way. We had better start taking them seriously.

Soon it will be too late to stop the inevitable, I fear.

It may be already.


37 posted on 09/02/2006 11:47:57 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (VISUALIZE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
That is exactly one of the scenarios...of severaal frightening ones...I postulate in my "Dragon's Fury Series" of novels about future world war with the Red Chinese and the fundamental Islamic nations. I wrote the five volumes between 2001 and 2004.

You can download the whole thing for free as an adobe ebook at the following site:

DRAGON'S FURY EBOOK DOWNLOAD

38 posted on 09/02/2006 11:59:44 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

You are welcome my friend. I hope and trust all is well with you and yours.


39 posted on 09/02/2006 12:00:19 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Martial arts. The umbrella being casually stepped along by the man as he walks - step one two three, the umbrella taps to the ground - then again, can also be a weapon at a moment's need.

Tai Chi, is slowly practiced fighting.

I've been to China, spent some time there. Chinese are almost without exception, focused on power, warfare and fighting. They're quite good at it.

All Asia seems militarized, ironically, compared with America. Typically here you can go for months without ever seeing any military vehicles - perhaps driving along the interstate with their lights on. In Asia, military is everywhere.

China is big, strong and military. PLA is everywhere, and society there is very carefully controlled. This poster thinks China is a (lot) like pre-war Germany.

Except they're a lot bigger, and have nukes.

Same attitude of wanting to right perceived historical grievances. Often the word "pride" is used by Chinese to describe their ascending power.

Problem is, in Chinese society there's virtually never a stable relationship between equals. We should not expect China to relate to us, the way we would relate to China if roles were reversed. Chinese "pride" will seem like something quite different, to us.

America, and Americans, tend to react positively to equality, and quite negatively to arrogance. Pride to an American, may lead to friendliness and generosity. Gloating is almost universally frowned upon.

China, and Chinese, are almost the exact opposite. All relationships are vertical. Either you are above, or below, others. If you are below them, you demur and act respectful.

If you are equal - that's just temporary.

If you are above others, you have "face", show off, gloat and pretty much act like a dictator. It's just the way it works. Power is used.

China, as it becomes stronger, will not become more moderate.

Moderation is for the weak. As China strengthens, it will become increasingly arrogant and confrontational.

Until eventually, it will attack.

That's the way it will be. I wish those in our government dealing with China, understood the Chinese.

We've become so PC and think everyone is the same, it may someday so hobble our ability to recognize danger, as to destroy our ability to protect ourselves.

We need to get past PC. Muslims are not like non-Muslims, and Chinese are not like Americans. Pretending we're all the same just makes things worse.

The sooner we are comfortable with those truths, the better for everyone.


40 posted on 09/02/2006 12:30:07 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (VISUALIZE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson