Suspect's DNA is a match in JonBenet Ramsey case

KUSA-TV | 8/16/06 | KUSA-TV

[varyouga]

Just breaking on KUSA-TV in Denver that the suspect arrested today in the case matches the DNA at the crime scene. Nothing on the web yet...

[OldFriend]

Accusing a man of murdering his daughter is so over the top as to be inexcusable. But that's just my opinion. He accused a man of murder and then complained that he himself was unjustly accused.

[Tulsa Ramjet]

http://digitalcontentproducer.com/mag/video_unveiling_womens_rights/

[Orange1998]

It was written to sell books and you fell for it hook, line and sinker. The police was building a case against one suspect. Once the police stopped looking and focus on one, saying anything could be misconstrued as something else.

I can only guess after you read the book you would been the first to flip the switch on old sparky. Now you know why the Ramseys' got counsel.

[A CA Guy]

Correct, that was another bad mistake, but he got paid in court for the mistake.
What will Mr. Ramsey get for his family?

[fanfan]

Ping

[MadLibDisease]

It has been known and reported for years that there was DNA on Jon Bonet that didn't match any of her family

[A CA Guy]

DNA more importantly should have excluded the Ramseys from the hell the investigation put them through as a target.

[Halls]

the Ramsey's passed 5 polygraphs, did you know that????

[babaloo]

Per Nancy Grace show expert,there were 2 drops of blood at the scene and that DR. Larry Kobolinsky (sp)DNA expert guy said that DNA testing methods had advanced over the recent years. Also said that there was email communication between the guy and someone in Boulder that was known by law enforcement.

[Cecily]

Other law enforcement people involved in the case supported Steve Thomas, and they didn't write any books. What was their motive for agreeing with him?

[BluH2o]

No one said it was sexual DNA and exactly what do you think the odds that this man's dna was found on her underwear if he was not there?? susie

Excuse me ... am I missing something here?

[Moonman62]

All those involved should be ashamed.

I think all the people who blamed the parents and the brother should be ashamed.

[MizSterious]

Evidently. They found dna in her underwear. It was not sexual dna, so it could have been left by sneezing, drooling, etc. It matches the dna of the suspect.

[Revel]

Yes...one of those shows on court TV had a show about this, and how bad the police there messed up the case. A lot of leads were not followed up on because of there obsession to blame the family. It would be interesting to see if this killer is tied to the dance school were this little girl attended. The TV program seemed to make a tie to that.

[MizSterious]

According to what I've read, the "other law enforcement" probably agreed because they were determined that one of the parents, probably (according to them) Patsy, did it. Tunnel vision.

[Orange1998]

Steve Thomas was a convincing guy. Means nothing in the rule of law. Maybe you should ask the perp the motive.

[netmilsmom]

Check out the posts on this thread.
It goes all the way through.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1684872/posts

[1L]

>>What was their motive for agreeing with him?<<

Idiocy, and/or thinking that if the police believe its likely, it must be true.

[RegulatorCountry]

"t was not sexual dna, so it could have been left by sneezing, drooling, etc. It matches the dna of the suspect."

It makes me think of all the weird pervs stealing panties, that I've read about over the years. They liked to smell of them, as I recall. Disgusting, I know, but that sort of behavior might shed some light on this, too.

[BluH2o]

I think all the people who blamed the parents and the brother should be ashamed.

Based on the reports emanating from Boulder at the time ... it was difficult to come to any other conclusion.
I plead guilty ... thank you.