Evidently. They found dna in her underwear. It was not sexual dna, so it could have been left by sneezing, drooling, etc. It matches the dna of the suspect.
"t was not sexual dna, so it could have been left by sneezing, drooling, etc. It matches the dna of the suspect."
It makes me think of all the weird pervs stealing panties, that I've read about over the years. They liked to smell of them, as I recall. Disgusting, I know, but that sort of behavior might shed some light on this, too.
Not according to FOX News this evening ... they don't have conclusive DNA evidence.
You, like many others, are jumping the gun.