Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Humans Evolve? Not Us, Say Americans
New York Times ^ | 08/15/2006

Posted on 08/15/2006 2:30:35 PM PDT by FewsOrange

In surveys conducted in 2005, people in the United States and 32 European countries were asked whether to respond “true,” “false” or “not sure” to this statement: “Human beings, as we know them, developed from earlier species of animals.” The same question was posed to Japanese adults in 2001. The United States had the second-highest percentage of adults who said the statement was false and the second-lowest percentage who said the statement was true, researchers reported in the current issue of Science. Only adults in Turkey expressed more doubts on evolution. In Iceland, 85 percent agreed with the statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: crevo; crevolist; evolution; faith; idjits; worldopinion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: freedumb2003
Well here is one link that is recen,t and a word search shows the aclu comes up plenty in the thread. It looked to me at least there was some some evo high fiving back slapping type celebration going on there.

Evolution issue tips board’s balance [Kansas school board election] Or "Darwin won"

There are probably 20 or 30 more articles like that, but I only have so much time and energy to put into this project.

W.
61 posted on 08/16/2006 11:03:15 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
ACLU Demands and Dover Designs [School Board Conspiracy gave ACLU #1M]

Judge in Dover case still fighting

Intelligent Judging — Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom

62 posted on 08/17/2006 8:56:59 AM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

If evolution was true, which it's not, there would be no reason to be against gay marriage and every reason to favor it.


63 posted on 08/17/2006 8:59:35 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

They are noting the results, not the ACLU's involvement.


64 posted on 08/17/2006 9:45:33 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
If evolution was true, which it's not, there would be no reason to be against gay marriage and every reason to favor it.

What an interesting, if convoluted, statement. How does that reason out? If anything, TToE would say that being gay is a "dead end" evolutionary tract.

65 posted on 08/17/2006 9:47:31 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Without the ACLU's involvement, they would not have had the results.

No evo is decrying the aclu's involvement in those threads.

How about you, here is the opportunity for at least one evolutionist to renounce the activities of the aclu in matters concerning public school and teaching of darwinsistic evolution.

W.
66 posted on 08/17/2006 10:07:13 AM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
What an interesting, if convoluted, statement. How does that reason out? If anything, TToE would say that being gay is a "dead end" evolutionary tract.

Evolution is a religion and it has very little in the way of sexual morality to worry about. Not only that but it also has the problem of over population to worry about.

67 posted on 08/17/2006 10:12:29 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
The title pulled me in.

The joke potential was enormous but then it got all serious and stuff.

68 posted on 08/17/2006 2:39:47 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Reporting for duty ma'am!

Do I get a swim noodle to beat posters of the Helen pics?

69 posted on 08/17/2006 2:42:30 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

I was thinking along the lines of psychological warfare.

I tell the men who post her picture that they are secretly attracted to her, that's why they post her pic so much. (and it does seem to be a guy thing -creepy, no?)


70 posted on 08/17/2006 3:15:46 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

When you call evolution a religion, does that mean you intend to give it the respect due to a religion, or does it mean that you own religion is open to the same kind of evisceration that evolution generally gets?


71 posted on 08/17/2006 3:23:19 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
I think it is related to the "courtesy sniff" concept where if a guy finds something stinky he must get all of his friends to smell it too.
72 posted on 08/17/2006 3:41:56 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: js1138; DungeonMaster
When you call evolution a religion, does that mean you intend to give it the respect due to a religion, or does it mean that you own religion is open to the same kind of evisceration that evolution generally gets?

How just about letting biology labs and biologists be tax-exempt? This would include pharmceutical firms, of course.

73 posted on 08/19/2006 6:20:45 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: js1138
When you call evolution a religion, does that mean you intend to give it the respect due to a religion, or does it mean that you own religion is open to the same kind of evisceration that evolution generally gets?

The bible doesn't say anything about "respect due to a religion".

"Evisceration" LOL.

74 posted on 08/21/2006 5:06:58 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson