Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke Case: Failure of Procedure
newsmax ^ | Wednesday, Aug. 9, 2006 | Susan Estrich

Posted on 08/09/2006 9:18:34 AM PDT by flixxx

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last
To: All

Sorry if this has already been posted.

Haven't seen it on the TV, wonder why no firestorm like the Duke Case? The News & Observer gave it about 35 words buried in the back of the sports section.

Can this be right?

http://www.wftv.com/sports/9651973/detail.html?rss=orlc&psp=news

-


41 posted on 08/09/2006 10:36:56 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: abb

My main concern is that he would just split the vote. Not sure what the climate is in Durham, but it seems like this would favor Nifong in November.


42 posted on 08/09/2006 10:38:20 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (...heavy strings, tune low, play hard and floor it. Floor it. That's technical talk....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: flixxx
None of this means the woman is lying.

No, but the fact that she gave 5 contradictory statements that are also contradicted by evidence DOES mean she is lying.

Estrich is trying to keep the false accuser out of the loop - she says it is the fault of the MAN!

A woman is never responsible for her actions. It is only man who can control their actions and must behave perfectly.

43 posted on 08/09/2006 10:38:34 AM PDT by Fido969 (Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong
Can this be right?

This story's PBF is too low, apparently...

44 posted on 08/09/2006 10:38:54 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: flixxx; abb
Well okay--I'm completely blown away! Susan Estrich has come around...Can Wendy and Nancy be far behind?

I guess if one believes in miracles.

45 posted on 08/09/2006 10:39:58 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

i really want to hear wendy murphy admit this as well.


46 posted on 08/09/2006 10:44:13 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: All

Time for a pool. Pick a date. This case is gonna be dismissed. There will be no trial. Not ever.


47 posted on 08/09/2006 10:54:47 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

I'm in. December 1 for me...


48 posted on 08/09/2006 10:58:19 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: paddles

Didn't Sydney Blumenthal and Bill Clinton invent that defense?


49 posted on 08/09/2006 11:05:10 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: abb

My gut tells me that it will be sooner -- and with the court's time table (appointment of the new judge (what's happening with that "exceptional case" designation?), oral argument on suppression of the ID procedure, a motion to dismiss (I don't think one has been filed), time for judge to write an opinion, etc.) a better guess might be mid-October -- but I'll take

December 21

Duke will on Christmas break and the dismissal will need some cooling time.


50 posted on 08/09/2006 11:14:43 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: flixxx
Maybe Susan could have been a bit more direct with Mr. Nifong as was Colonel Nathan Jessep to Lt. Daniel Kaffee in A Few Good Men
Please tell me you've got something more, Lieutenant. Please tell me there's an ace up your sleeve. These two marines are on trial for their lives. Please tell me their lawyer hasn't pinned their hopes to a phone bill.

51 posted on 08/09/2006 11:17:14 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill

Reckon Nifong can handle the truth?


52 posted on 08/09/2006 11:23:33 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: abb

ANNOUNCING THE SALE OF 7 TRINITY PARK PROPERTIES
Owned by Durham Realty, Inc., a support corporation of Duke University
[Formerly Owned by Solie Family]



http://www.realestate.duke.edu/trinpark.htm


53 posted on 08/09/2006 11:28:26 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: abb
Reckon Nifong can handle the truth?

Nifong's sees "truth" the way an umpire saw balls and strikes when I was a kid... He once told me "it ain't nothing til I call it"...

54 posted on 08/09/2006 11:31:49 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret
Am I too optimistic to say September 19th? Don't know why, just picked a day. So does the winner of the pool get say 2 weeks of bragging rights and praise?
55 posted on 08/09/2006 11:34:44 AM PDT by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

"Time for a pool. Pick a date."

August 21st hearing (effectively; what happens there will make it impossible to continue with the case)

Otherwise we pin donkey ears on Titus.


56 posted on 08/09/2006 11:35:09 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: maggief
I read early on the Duke had bought up the houses to resell them to families that would be more stable than the students who currently occupied them.

I wonder how many Fair Housing Act violations will be committed before Duke gets the "right kind of people" into the "neighborhood".

57 posted on 08/09/2006 11:37:49 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong; abb; All
Ex-Girlfriend: Fight Over Alleged Affair Led To Ex-Wolfpack Star's Arrest
Marcus Melvin Appears In Court On Strangulation Charges

POSTED: 12:06 pm EDT August 9, 2006

http://www.wral.com/news/9653682/detail.html

PITTSBORO, N.C. -- A former North Carolina State basketball player made his first court appearance on charges he tried to strangle his ex-girlfriend.

Marcus Melvin appeared before the judge Wednesday at the Chatham County courtroom and did not say anything after his court appearance.

Shaunesi DeBerry said she argued with Melvin after she learned that he was cheating on her with a woman in Italy and that the other woman was pregnant with his child. She alleges that in the heat of the argument, he placed his hands around his neck.

"I looked on the phone bill and I saw a number on there from a girl from Italy. She told me that she was pregnant," DeBerry said. "He got mad that I found out because I wasn't supposed to find out."

Melvin played for the Wolfpack from 2000 to 2004. Since graduating from the university, he has played basketball professionally in Italy.

DeBerry said she and Melvin lived together for three years and had problems throughout their relationship. According to court documents, Melvin pleaded guilty three months ago to misdemeanor charges of assaulting and threatening Deberry. Melvin was also accused of assaulting another woman, but charges were voluntarily dismissed.

Still, DeBerry said she does not hold a grudge against Melvin.

"I love Marcus to death to this day, even after all the fights, all the women, all of the heat and beating, I love him to death and that is why he needs help," she said.

DeBerry said that is why she reported the latest incident to police.

"I don't want him to go to jail. He is not a criminal. He is not criminal-minded," she said. "He can't control it because it is something that gets into it. It just happened and I want him to get to get help."

DeBerry and Melvin share an 8-month-old child together. DeBerry said she wants to put the incident behind her and go back to college. Melvin's next court date is scheduled for Sept. 11.
58 posted on 08/09/2006 11:38:16 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bjc
"But at the very least, standard procedure should have been to await the results of tests, and then, given the results, the inconsistencies in the woman's statements, the fact that at least one of the boys seems to have an airtight alibi, investigate further before indicting anyone."

But notice how she mentions nothing about the AV and the glaring inconsistencies in the AV's stories.

Look again.

59 posted on 08/09/2006 11:48:18 AM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Unfortunately you are mistaken.

A common theme running through the Durham AA community is that the "Duke boys 'bought' the DNA results, the alibis, etc."

The other main theory goes, "Even if they didn't rape her, they were planning to, so they deserve what they get!"

If they are tried by a black jury in Durham, they are going down.


60 posted on 08/09/2006 11:52:15 AM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson