Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durham Police Begin Probe Of Alleged Assault At Raleigh Bar (Investigators under investigation)
WRAL.com ^ | July 22, 2006 | WRAL .com

Posted on 07/22/2006 4:18:08 PM PDT by TommyDale

DURHAM, N.C. -- Officials say they are investigating an alleged assault involving Durham police officers outside a Raleigh bar.

(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: chalmers; coffee; comegetsome; corruption; couch; crime; cupofjoe; donutwatch; duke; dukelax; durhampolice; gottlieb; hatecrime; jakki; lacrosse; myspace; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,481-1,491 next last
To: Neverforget01

I was just thinking the same thing. Who does Nifong have to call as witnesses?

A rookie SANE nurse
The hooking, embezzling, bird-flipping Kim/Nikki
Jakki, transvestite and strip club manager?
Dear ol' Dad with yet another tale to tell
The Driver, was his DNA found in the AV?
The regular Driver/Pimp, was his DNA found in the AV?
The Private DNA lab, anyone find out if Nifong's brother-in-law works for the lab?
The racist, intimidating supervising DPD investigator Gottlieb
A rookie lead investigator Himan
The DPP "check on the young 'uns" first responders

Then there is Why Didn't You Call 911 Bissey.


Yessiree ... pass the popcorn!


1,041 posted on 07/26/2006 6:40:31 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1039 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Oops ... make that Hinman. LOL


1,042 posted on 07/26/2006 6:42:00 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

Melanie is conflicted. In other circumstances the N&O would wallow in bashing Durham and its racist cops. However, to do so now would mean she'd have to support the racist and elite lax players. What to do? What to do?


1,043 posted on 07/26/2006 6:43:50 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1008 | View Replies]

To: maggief

To a Durham jury raised on Jerry Springer, all these people are perfectly credible.


1,044 posted on 07/26/2006 6:49:43 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Excellent list!

And we can't forget the lovely victim herself. The I was raped, wasn't raped, was raped, forget how many because I was drunk , wasn't drunk , wanted more money "escort".

No one could make this up!

1,045 posted on 07/26/2006 6:50:46 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
If that happened, a directed verdict would be warranted.

I wondered if in the event that two were acquited and one convicted if an immediate setting aside of the 3rd verdict would be warranted. You think any Durham judge would do that?
1,046 posted on 07/26/2006 6:50:49 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1001 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I think once one ID is proven wrong, the reasonable doubt is overwhelming for the other two accused. No way a conviction for any of them if all it is based on is the "victim's" ID.


1,047 posted on 07/26/2006 6:55:04 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1046 | View Replies]

To: JLS

"You think any Durham judge would do that?"

No. I think the chance of getting a huge payoff for the governor of NC to give everybody a pardon is too great for them to let go of it. (JMHO, of course).


1,048 posted on 07/26/2006 7:03:49 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1046 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

BTW, whatever happened to the question of where Kim and co. were BEFORE they came to Buchanan street? Did they have a gig at NCCU? A frat there?
There was speculation about that--but it's apparently dropped from sight.
(Maybe they were at a hotel with someone known to Durham's finest?)
In this case, I believe it. (And yes, it DOES belong on Jerry Springer. . .)


1,049 posted on 07/26/2006 7:05:15 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

Wouldn't it be priceless is the defense calls the vibrator couple she serviced prior to the LAX party?


1,050 posted on 07/26/2006 7:07:21 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

I also think it's possible that Nifong thought at least one of the players would have had sex with one of the "dancers" (whom he might for some inexplicable reason have thought to be also prostitutes). That would make his case a slam-dunk,
with kudos to him and a giant payoff at the end from the super-rich families of those kids. He'd hit the jackpot.

But, when it turned out they didn't have sex with Precious,
he was caught in a jam, and has since been winging it. (JMHO)


1,051 posted on 07/26/2006 7:07:26 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

This case makes Springer look G-rated. But, yes you are correct that the jury is an issue, if it is tried in Durham.


1,052 posted on 07/26/2006 7:09:27 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: gopheraj

mark


1,053 posted on 07/26/2006 7:14:30 AM PDT by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
BTW, whatever happened to the question of where Kim and co. were BEFORE they came to Buchanan street?

According to the written statements, the AV left daddy's house and went to Brian's to shower and try on outfits for him while he played with his joystick ( video games, get your mind out of the gutter )... They left his house at 10:45, got lost and didn't get to 610 til 11:50 ish...

Don't know about Kim's pre-party affairs...um...er.. actions, yet...

1,054 posted on 07/26/2006 7:33:59 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Precious needs to be at the top of the list. The defense attorneys need to be prepared to have her identify all of her aliases. Pleasure Ryde might be hard to explain on the witness stand.
1,055 posted on 07/26/2006 7:49:59 AM PDT by Hogeye13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: maggief
A rookie SANE nurse
The hooking, embezzling, bird-flipping Kim/Nikki
Jakki, transvestite and strip club manager?
Dear ol' Dad with yet another tale to tell
The Driver, was his DNA found in the AV?
The regular Driver/Pimp, was his DNA found in the AV?
The Private DNA lab, anyone find out if Nifong's brother-in-law works for the lab?
The racist, intimidating supervising DPD investigator Gottlieb
A rookie lead investigator Himan
The DPP "check on the young 'uns" first responders

Then there is Why Didn't You Call 911 Bissey.


Who Nifong will present as:

1. a hard working unbiased health care worker who believes Mangum was raped.

2. a hard working young mother doing what she has to do to make restitution and who in all the taunting and acrimony that night did not notice that Mangum disappeared for a while, but did later remember and "heard" what probably was the rape going on.

3. a nobody. Jakki will not be called.

4. an upset relative, except of course Dad won't be called either.

5. as a bum who did not stay and protect Mangum, if he is called at all.

6. a nobody. The "boyfriend" will not be called.

7. a dispassonate scientist who found a partial DNA match.

8. the type of cop that poor Mangum had to deal with to get her case even heard. This may elicit sympathy for Mangum.

9. as the earnest young good guy cop who tied up this case.

10. as concerned police officers who misheard Mangums story in the fog of the events of the night.

11. as the concerned neighbor and good guy white Durmite compared to the evil yankee defendents who did not call 911 because he say the women did manage to get out of there.

If this mess gets to trial, Nifong is going to try to win as he should. He is going to present the best case he can and keep the roughness of the Mangum crowd from the jury as much as he can.

That is why since Nifong and everyone who has followed this case knows these guys are not guilty, this should not be allowed to go to trial.
1,056 posted on 07/26/2006 7:51:13 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: maggief
"This case makes Springer look G-rated. But, yes you are correct that the jury is an issue, if it is tried in Durham."

Hey, what a great idea! Anyone up there in the midwest have any contacts? Let's get Jerry Springer to do a show on this case!! LOL! I can just see the cops sitting on one side, calling the other side racial slurs, then Jakki ripping off her/his wig and attacking someone on stage.

1,057 posted on 07/26/2006 8:01:31 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

TD, you can bet all the players on the AV side will be there. A free trip to Chicago would be impossible to pass up.


1,058 posted on 07/26/2006 8:08:14 AM PDT by Hogeye13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
No way a conviction for any of them if all it is based on is the "victim's" ID. Two words: Oranthal James. Consider the mind-set of one Durham resident, Tom Miller, in his letter to the editor today, entitled "Is anyone surprised by Cheek's indecisiveness?": http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/hsletters/ Then there's the ourheartsworld and justice4twosisters crew. My greatest fear for these obviously innocent men is rooted in two more words: Jury Nullification.
1,059 posted on 07/26/2006 8:10:46 AM PDT by NDLax84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies]

To: NDLax84

No one is more afraid of a conviction than I. However, if this case has TV cameras or if the trancripts are made public, since there is No evidence of any crime , the public outcry wil be louder than OJ. In this case defendants can appeal...


1,060 posted on 07/26/2006 8:15:47 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,481-1,491 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson