Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lacrosse Scandal: The Duke Accuser—New Credibility Questions (Newsweek)
Newsweek ^ | June 19, 2006 Issue | Susannah Meadows

Posted on 06/11/2006 10:06:55 AM PDT by zaxxon

Early in the Duke lacrosse rape investigation, Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong, who was in a close race to keep his job, spoke about the physical and emotional trauma the alleged victim had suffered at the hands of the players. A police affidavit stated that her medical records revealed the victim had "injuries consistent with being raped and sexually assaulted vaginally and anally." But according to a motion filed by defense attorneys last week, no such physical trauma was found during her exam at Duke hospital. Quoting from the report, which was submitted to the court under seal, the motion states that the nurse—who was in training—examined the woman's entire pelvic region and noted only diffuse swelling of the vaginal walls, a condition explainable by consensual sexual activity.

Police documents indicate that the accuser had in fact engaged in such activity in the days leading up to the incident. The accuser told police that she'd had sex with her boyfriend a week before. She added that she'd also performed using a vibrator in front of a couple. (Though the timing of this incident is not specific, the clear implication is that it had happened near the time of the lacrosse party.) And, according to defense attorneys, the boyfriend's seminal fluid was found in her, suggesting she'd also had sex with him within 72 hours. Jarriel Johnson, who identified himself as the woman's driver, told police in a statement that in addition to sleeping with the accuser himself a week prior to the party, he'd taken her to several appointments at hotels in the days before.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durhamdirtbag; nifong; precious; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 681-685 next last
To: Jezebelle
Strange and unprofessional action for a DA, wasn't it? Of course, his lack of judgment is monumental....he believed the 2nd round of DNA would 'prove' she was raped by those 'hooligans' and he wanted to GLOAT about being right.

I'm praying for the boomerang effect....the one he threw out is now heading for his ass.

241 posted on 06/12/2006 5:05:35 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

I guess my thought is: If we KNOW that he picked this up "Personally", did he also pick up the SANE report personally? and....."Did he read it and make her re-write it to suit him? Is Crystal's signature on their anyplace and/or witness signatures? A trainee might just be talked into a minor revision to suit the DA....a legal expert. It would be a perfect forgery........


242 posted on 06/12/2006 5:11:37 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

Off the cuff? It was a four-page, handwritten, detailed statement.


243 posted on 06/12/2006 5:12:31 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

.....while the boys' story remains the same - solid and unshakeable.


244 posted on 06/12/2006 5:13:31 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

Thanks, GAgal.

Good to see you. You've been gone a few days.


245 posted on 06/12/2006 5:15:15 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I think I read that there was one (or more) doctor overseeing the SANE nurse in training, so there was most likely a witness signature on the report as well. If it was later amended, the defense would or should know about it by now since Nifong is required by law to give them ALL the discovery evidence.

Mind you, I don't put anything past Nifong, but I don't think he would succeed in altering a report from the hospital. He was posturing big time for the press....sign of a very little man who wanted/needed/craved the attention for his big case....and election victory.

246 posted on 06/12/2006 5:21:45 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

The talking heads NEVER connect the dots. They simple will now or are not capable of linking a fact learned one day to a fact learned another day, and piecing together the story. It's always a "here and now" separate item left to stand alone. They miss more than they catch.


247 posted on 06/12/2006 5:27:10 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: JLS

It sounds like this governor has his head up his ass like most Rats looking for money and the hustle. I doubt that he cares a lick about this case. I would be shocked if he or the state's AG did anything about this.

But you make a good point. Blacks aren't going to abandon the plantation, but some whites might.


248 posted on 06/12/2006 5:31:22 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

Clark is retired, and he has no knowledge about this case whatsoever. I fault the host for having people on just to blow smoke. It's insulting to us for the host to believe that the viewers would be taken in by somebody who doesn't know the case and is just running his or her mouth to present "balance." Some things are just not balanced, and when you try to make it appear that way, it's a distortion.


249 posted on 06/12/2006 5:34:44 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

It's also been reported that there's a big lax poster in the lax party house living room where this all supposedly happened.


250 posted on 06/12/2006 5:38:46 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

But the most important thing it supposes is that these guys don't have a Fifth Amendment right not to talk to the cops. It's an outrageous position to take.


251 posted on 06/12/2006 5:41:07 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
Don't forget one of the biggest lies told by Nifong and the DPD. They repeatedly said the boys hid their identities and their team. Implying some sort of planning for this attack.

Right you are, Kim asked to see ID (Evans?) while getting her money up front, BEFORE "dancing." It is in her statement which I can't access right now.
252 posted on 06/12/2006 5:50:57 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: maggief; ltc8k6

No, No.

That statement was made before she got a lawyer (the same lawyer advising the AV's family). We have to be accomodating. Why shouldn't she profit from this whole thing?


253 posted on 06/12/2006 6:21:41 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Off the cuff? It was a four-page, handwritten, detailed statement.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

That's not where she called it a CROC. A detective spoke to her and in his report notes he annotated she told him that.

Nancy Grace said late last week she gave a multi-page statement to them and in THAT statement she says she was alone in her car for 25 minutes with Crytal being inside the house during that time.

What a coincidence. Her lawyer is advising both the AV family and Kim and her story now accomodates plenty of time for the event to have occured.


254 posted on 06/12/2006 6:48:52 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

Yeah these people sure get "squeamish" about medical reports. Posters have referred to the Bryant case and Wendy Murphy's "ripped vagina" comment, and I remember Rita Cosby swooning over "semen in he panties." And now that there is a possibility that the A/V might be a hooker pogo sticking for money, they get "uncomfortable."


255 posted on 06/12/2006 7:33:03 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
"Nifong is REQUIRED BY LAW to turn over ALL his evidence to the defense. ... if he does have some [powerful evidence], why hasn't he turned it over to him?

I think it was Judge Napolitano on FNC this weekend who addressed this. As I recall, the Judge said that Nifong's obligation to disclose begins after his (Nifong's) investigation, which is allegedly ongoing, ends.
256 posted on 06/12/2006 7:48:05 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

What is left for him to 'investigate'? This job should not be a 24/365 one....Of course, he COULD check the credibility of the false accuser.


257 posted on 06/12/2006 7:53:27 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
"What is left for him to 'investigate'?"

Agreed. I was just passing along Napolitano's explanation of the legal obligation for Nifong to disclose state's evidence at this point in time. It's becoming increasingly obvious that he has little credible evidence against the three accused players to disclose. My best guess is that the case will end with the accuser refusing to testify, claiming that the public spotlight is too painful, etc., and this will give Nifong a way to exit and still claim that he had an winning hand.
258 posted on 06/12/2006 8:17:22 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2

Would you believe millions. Those non-indicted have spend several thousand. You have to understand how devastating this really is. I know you are all bummed out over the coverage of this case on cable news, but it is all that is standing between three young men and a lynch mob and total financial ruin for three sets of parents, possibly grandparents and siblings who are sitting ducks with no one else to turn to. Never again on my watch -- been there, seen it, lived it, paying for it, no other woman's son while I'm alive and breathing.


259 posted on 06/12/2006 10:05:05 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Right you are, Kim asked to see ID (Evans?) while getting her money up front, BEFORE "dancing." It is in her statement which I can't access right now.

Dan F. NY license she thought...

260 posted on 06/12/2006 10:07:19 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 681-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson