Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pit bulls shot to death after attack on cow (sad picture of mother cow, protecting it's calf)
ajc.com ^ | 05/24/06 | Mark Davis

Posted on 05/24/2006 8:42:10 AM PDT by rawhide

Cecil Wallace awoke about 4:30 a.m. Saturday to the bawling of cows and the howling of dogs. The Buford farmer grabbed his shotgun and went running out the back door.

His son and next-door neighbor, Kenneth Wallace, also jarred awake — also carrying a shotgun — joined him. Father and son ran toward the pasture...

...Reaching the pasture, the Wallaces saw a cow, bloodied and torn, its calf standing nearby. As they approached the animal, according to reports, two dogs came running towards them.

Kenneth Wallace raised his 12-gauge. Boom! The larger dog hit the dirt, howling. Wallace fired again, and the dog was quiet.

The female kept coming. Kenneth Wallace fired a third time, the blast echoing along the darkened reaches of Bart Johnson Road.

The Wallaces dragged the dogs' bodies aside and tended to the cow, Betsy. She looked bad — right ear torn off, the left shredded like paper. Her nose was ripped and torn. Two teeth were knocked loose. Not long after daybreak, Cecil Wallace took Betsy to a Cumming veterinarian, who prescribed painkillers and antibiotics for the Angus/Hereford cross.

"She's still in bad shape," Cecil Wallace, 73, said Tuesday. "She tries to eat, but she can't; her mouth's too sore."

Animal control officers have cited one dog owner with failing to have the animal on a leash.. They also charged the owner with violating the county's vicious-animal ordinance, which requires owners of a dangerous dog or cat to have it muzzled whenever the animal is off the owner's property.

Meghan Martin, who lives near the Wallaces, said she is the owner whom officers cited...p>

When I went to sleep, my dog was in bed with me," she said. A roommate let out her dog, plus a friend's pit bull, Martin said...

(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...


TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: bsl; calf; cow; dogofpeace; maul; pitbull; pitbulls; rdo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 401-418 next last
To: BJungNan; GMMAC; Fair Go; kanawa

Your words have already been debated and debunked numerous times here.

I asked it before on this thread, and I will ask you now. Following your logic, what is your annual donation to the Brady Group, Rebecca Peters, and all the other anti-gun types?

All done in the name of 'public safety'.


181 posted on 05/27/2006 11:43:37 PM PDT by proud_yank (A liberal's 'generosity' is limited to the funds available in someone else's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

There was a similar case here recently. It arose out of a neighbourhood dispute. The "dangerous dog" was a tiny little thing that was absolutely harmless. Fortunately the media showed how ridiculous the whole episode was. Some people just hate dogs and want all dogs banned.


182 posted on 05/27/2006 11:46:47 PM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go; girlangler
Some people just hate dogs and want all dogs banned.

PeTA!

I guess that in the ideal socialist world, where were all 'equal', people won't be allowed to own anything.
183 posted on 05/27/2006 11:49:17 PM PDT by proud_yank (A liberal's 'generosity' is limited to the funds available in someone else's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

But in a socialist world some people are more equal than others. Those holding power are invariably much better off than the masses. To the seekers of power, socialism is a valuable tool with which to exploit the vulnerable.


184 posted on 05/27/2006 11:57:58 PM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go

LOL, thats not what all those wearing Che T-shirts keep telling me! I thought it was a beautiful thing, where everyone was equal? /dripping sarcasm


185 posted on 05/28/2006 12:14:30 AM PDT by proud_yank (A liberal's 'generosity' is limited to the funds available in someone else's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

186 posted on 05/28/2006 4:55:55 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

187 posted on 05/28/2006 5:29:09 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

188 posted on 05/28/2006 5:35:01 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go

You know that someone has gone around the bend when they refer to dogs as "evil".


189 posted on 05/28/2006 5:53:32 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Again, if you call changing the subject legitimate debate, then you belong over at DU and not on FR.

If you want to talk about guns, I am sure there is a thread for that. In this thread, however, we are talking about pitbulls.


190 posted on 05/28/2006 8:50:33 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
Given that your FR homepage states:
"Posting from China when not in the U.S."
it makes it pretty easy to figure out how you fit in so well with the rest of the fascist, statist bully boys on this thread who seem to have no grasp whatsoever of such basic conservative tenets as "private property rights", "individual accountability" and "innocent until proven guilty".

BTW, rather than attempting to deluge us with one liberal-like, unreasoning, emotion-driven post after another why not merely try answering the simple question I asked way back in post #151:

" ... where's the justification/rationale for the negative impact of your draconian "final solution" on hundreds of thousands of law-abiding, conscientious dog-owners ???"
191 posted on 05/28/2006 11:04:28 AM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; Cap'n Crunch
Watch out for bears, they can do you in

While I've seen bears many times there have been only two times that have concerned me.
Once, three Springs ago the dog and I were walking a trail in the same park as above when,
not 12 feet in front of us, a bear came barreling out of the brush onto the trail
and high-tailed it down the path, thankfully away from us.
While I was caught a bit flat-footed, my dog's instincts kicked in and he started to give chase.
With some anxiety I gave the command to halt and was pleased when he obeyed.
Since then I've been more aware of the need to make enough noise to warn of our approach.
I've taken to shouting out, "NO BEARS ALLOWED" at regular intervals. ;~)

The second occurrence while not directly affecting me made me realize the seriousness of the potential danger.
Last August I had spent 2 weeks of remote travel in the Missinaibi Lake area of northern Ontario.
After a week of my return home a report came through of a woman being killed by a bear in a location I had passed through on my journey...link
The woman's husband had frantically tried to fight off the bear with a Swiss Army knife.

While a predatory bear is a rarity, this event convinced me to be better prepared.
While a gun is not an option at this point,
(and in the area mentioned not allowed, being part of the Chapleau Game Preserve)
I'm not going to be left with a Swiss Army knife as a means of defense.
I was considering an 8" but settled for this 6" Buck knife,
made in the good ol' U.S. of A.

That would be my final line of defense,
may not save me but I'd like to put some hurt on him as I go down.
Probably never need it but I'd sure feel foolish if I did and didn't have it.
My first defense, hopefully only for nuisance bears, is a compressed air horn,
followed by bear-bangers and pepper spray.
The dog may help as a deterrent as well.

192 posted on 05/28/2006 2:49:10 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
BTW, rather than attempting to deluge us with one liberal-like, unreasoning, emotion-driven post after another why not merely try answering the simple question I asked way back in post #151:

" ... where's the justification/rationale for the negative impact of your draconian "final solution" on hundreds of thousands of law-abiding, conscientious dog-owners ???"

I did answer your question. Allow me to answer it again.

I don't need anymore justification that this. And as is my right and the American way, I will continue to lobby our elected representatives to ban all pitbulls in residential neighborhoods.

193 posted on 05/28/2006 9:31:49 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
You know that someone has gone around the bend when they refer to dogs as "evil".

Let's not play loose with the fact. No one said dogs were evil. They did say Pitbulls are evil. Perhaps still a wee bit over the top, but they are very bad dogs.

194 posted on 05/28/2006 9:38:19 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: kanawa; GMMAC

Good luck with the drongo.


195 posted on 05/28/2006 9:49:25 PM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
If you want to be prepared for being cornered by a bear, and can't have a gun, then a spear is the next best thing to have. There is an inexpensive hollow handled knife which you can make into a spear by mounting it on a stout sappling, and you can use the butt of the spear to pole your canoe across shallows. After the spear the next best thing is an axe.

When you get into the deep wilderness, bears can spell trouble, and its good to be prepared. One is usually not much of a problem but if two or three of them get onto your camp/food scent, they will hound you mercilessly.This problem is compounded by some campers who feed bears, so they learn to hang out waiting for canoists. I favor this hollow handled knife , simply because it can easily be made into a spear from any straight sappling, and it offers formidable protection against a bear.

Two men each with a spear could easily kill a bear, well not easily, it would be work. I usually make my spear the first day out and it doubles as a canoe pole and hiking staff.Two are better than one.I try to make it 6 to 7 feet long. I keep it handy at night by thrusting the butt end of the spear into the ground outside my tent door. The blade comes with a cordura sheath and doubles as a knife until you make a spear of it. Costs about 20 bucks, and is available from many suppliers, I use SMKW , Smokey Mountain knife works. This knife could save your life, it is called the " Cold Steel Bushman", 12-1/4 inches overall, with a seven inch razor sharp blade: Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

196 posted on 05/28/2006 11:33:56 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
In the Yukon territories and Alaska, where men and women still must depend on dogs for their survival, you would last about 20 minutes in arguing with them like you are here, and Huskies can chew up a child faster than a pitt bull and do far worse injury. As a matter of fact the picture of the child you posted showed a single bite injury where a dog had grabbed the child. A huskie would tear out a persons throat. Yet they are not banned.

But why do so many thousands of people, including Indians and Eskimos cultivate and use huskies in their daily lives. Why don't these northerners ban their dogs . Becuase when one goes wild they realize that it is not generallly the dogs fault, but the owners.

Take your single incident driven mentality with which you would end the good ownership of dogs by good handlers, by far the majority,and take it on over to MOVE ON.ORG. Such thinking does not work here. Its a conservative forum, and your thinking on the issue is not conservative. Its the same thinking that brought us the Brady Bill and gun control.

197 posted on 05/28/2006 11:47:21 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
In the Yukon territories and Alaska, where men and women still must depend on dogs for their survival...

There you go. In the Alaskan wild, let them have all the pitbulls they want. In my neighborhood - or any neighborhood where there are children, either ban 'em or make it legal to shoot them if they are out of someone's yard off a leash.

As a matter of fact the picture of the child you posted showed a single bite injury where a dog had grabbed the child.

Your are sick - literally - if you look at that childs face and minimize her injuries as you have.

A huskie would...

We are not talking about Huskies (we are not talking about SUV's or about guns). You are completely incapable of sticking to the sujbect, pitbulls in residential neighborhoods.

Take your single incident driven mentality...

I'm guilty on that one. It is the many incidents of pitbulls viciously attacking or simply terrorizing neighborhoods that has me (and many others) wanting to ban pitbulls.

...with which you would end the good ownership of dogs by good handlers...

I've seen an incident where the pitbull of a good owner attacked a child. He could not believe it. He had years of experience with dogs and sounded just like you before that incident. Now he says no one should own the things anywhere that children can be exposed to them. That is full experience talking.

Add to that the irresponsible, incapable and the punks that want a pitbull and now you have real trouble. Yet, you will not even propose that an owner of a pitbull must prove they are, as you say, good handlers before they can own one. Do you propose even that much?

take it on over to MOVE ON.ORG. Such thinking does not work here.

Shall we put it to a vote of FR? Help me work out the poll questions and the answers and we will put your assertion to the test. My suggested poll question and answer would be as follows:

Should pitbulls be allowed in residential neighborhoods?
- Yes, anyone should be allowed to own one.
- Yes, but they must prove they can handle pitbulls.
- No, they should be banned.
-No, the breed should be made extinct.

198 posted on 05/29/2006 8:47:32 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan; Fair Go; Candor7; feinswinesuksass; solosmoke; proud_yank; fanfan; kanawa
Plainly, neither you - nor any of your fellow travelers - answered the specific question or any of the related ones posed with respect to the open cavalier disregard for basic civil liberties & the lack of any conservative propriety inherent in favoring a totalitarian, high-handed & intrusive 'big government' solution over one based upon individual responsibility & accountability.

Typical of all both red & black fascists, you've simply side-stepped reason & logic to, instead, go on bleating out the same nonfactual emotionally-driven harangue.

All pro-totalitarian bully-boys subscribe to the debating philosophy of their obvious spiritual mentor Joseph Goebbels - the long acknowledged master of ignoring the truth while coupling repetition with cynical appeals to mindless emotion:
"lies told often enough become the truth"

Accordingly, it's not surprising you have no wish to provide straight answers to honest questions as doing so would only reveal you to be precisely what you are.
199 posted on 05/29/2006 9:30:20 AM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
I was listening to the radio and some doof veterinarian was talking about how he'd been bitten more by chihuahuas than pit bulls or rotweillers. Well, that may be true, but it ignores the amount of damage done by the attack. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who raise pit bulls for fighting. One of the big reasons Humane Societies screen owners now is because the pit bull guys would come in and get dogs for their pit bulls to practice on.

Unfortunately, for probably the last twenty years, pit bulls have been bred to be aggressive and as such, I wouldn't own one. I've also known several pit bull owners, and most of them breed the dogs for fighting, and fight them.

200 posted on 05/29/2006 9:45:41 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 401-418 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson