[BJungNan]

BTW, rather than attempting to deluge us with one liberal-like, unreasoning, emotion-driven post after another why not merely try answering the simple question I asked way back in post #151:

" ... where's the justification/rationale for the negative impact of your draconian "final solution" on hundreds of thousands of law-abiding, conscientious dog-owners ???"

I did answer your question. Allow me to answer it again.

I don't need anymore justification that this. And as is my right and the American way, I will continue to lobby our elected representatives to ban all pitbulls in residential neighborhoods.

[GMMAC]

Plainly, neither you - nor any of your fellow travelers - answered the specific question or any of the related ones posed with respect to the open cavalier disregard for basic civil liberties & the lack of any conservative propriety inherent in favoring a totalitarian, high-handed & intrusive 'big government' solution over one based upon individual responsibility & accountability.

Typical of all both red & black fascists, you've simply side-stepped reason & logic to, instead, go on bleating out the same nonfactual emotionally-driven harangue.

All pro-totalitarian bully-boys subscribe to the debating philosophy of their obvious spiritual mentor Joseph Goebbels - the long acknowledged master of ignoring the truth while coupling repetition with cynical appeals to mindless emotion:
"lies told often enough become the truth"

Accordingly, it's not surprising you have no wish to provide straight answers to honest questions as doing so would only reveal you to be precisely what you are.