Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is your opinion of 911's tower collapse
Email ^ | April 29, 2006 | Blogger

Posted on 04/29/2006 3:40:05 PM PDT by Blogger

I received an email from a friend regarding the Trade Towers collapse. I haven't watched the entire video in the attachment as it is over an hour and I have other things for my Saturday planned. However, before I watch it, for those who have seen such 'evidence' that the towers collapsed due to controlled implosion or something like that, what is your view of the conspiracy theory. I've never seen Michael Moore's stuff (don't plan on seeing it either). I haven't delved too deeply into any of the conspiracys other than to know they exist. Am interested in hearing the Freepers take on things though.

Please don't reply unless you have studied the evidence from both sides.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 911; 911conspiracy; conspiracy; dummie; laffriot; loosechange; moonbattiness; nutjob; retread; tinfoilhat; troll; whacko; worldtradetowers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: Blogger

Indeed, the fighter jet story is retarded. It would take a much larger missile than a fighter would normally carry to damage the armored side of the Pentagon like that. I'm certainly no authority, but anything short of a harpoon missile or a tomohawk wouldn't do it. For Perspective, recall, we hit a building in Iraq with 4 tomahawks trying to get Saddam in the beginning of the war.


81 posted on 04/29/2006 6:43:04 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Hopefully, it will make him think.

Good luck with that.

 

82 posted on 04/29/2006 6:46:28 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
I am here to discuss current news items with intelligent thoughtful like minded people.

This does not include posting every stupid e-mail I get.

Look I am sorry that you took offense. But I am not sorry that I called you on not even searching before you posted this junk.

I am going to say this one last time. You posted an e-mail that has been discussed to death. It is a dead horse. It is jello. Quit beating it.

83 posted on 04/29/2006 6:46:54 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Ditch the 1967 Outer Space Treaty! I want my own space bar and grill (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Don't be sorry. Anyone who thinks there are two sides to this story is a moron or a troll.


84 posted on 04/29/2006 6:56:06 PM PDT by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap
I just want people to search before they go posting their e-mails. I have seen this posted several times in the past month.

Like I said this has been talked to death over the past five years. There are TV specials and magazines. And they have been hashed over and rehashed on this very website. What is there to say that has not been said?

85 posted on 04/29/2006 7:03:59 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Ditch the 1967 Outer Space Treaty! I want my own space bar and grill (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Did you know that the "man in the moon" logo on Proctor and Gamble products is actually a Satanist logo? Also, athiests are circulating a petition to try and get Christian programming barred from the airwaves?

To all reading this post, particularly those on FR who take EVERYTHING too seriously, the preceeding post was humor, sarcasm, a joke. These are two well-known urban myths. My post was not meant to disparage Proctor and Gamble or their fine products. Nor was it meant to offend any organization associated with American athiests, or their founder, who was killed by one of her employees and hidden in a 55 gallon drum.

86 posted on 04/29/2006 7:15:59 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Say have you heard that Bill Gates is offering a $1,000 reward to everyone who forwards his e-mail message?


87 posted on 04/29/2006 7:30:34 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Ditch the 1967 Outer Space Treaty! I want my own space bar and grill (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Hey Blogger, here is my two cents. I am not a structural engineer and I don't play one on TV, but I have looked at both sides of the conspiracy. The videos look pretty straight forward, a plane hits the tower and eventually it collapses. Both of them to be exact.

The building techniques were not designed to withstand a current commercial air liner AND the the fuel that it carries burning at an ungodly hight temperature.

My background is search and rescue techniques and I had first hand information taught to me immediately following the Murrah Building incident by team members who were on scene. That does not make me an expert and I am not implying that. But, it does help put it into perspective.

I really can't say that the building was an orchestrated event either MIHOP or LIHOP and that is what drives these rumors. The ability to wonder is waht fuels the fire. There is plenty of info to found in the internet, just google it and you'll see.

I do not believe that any government would let it happen on purpose (LIHOP) or make it happen on purpose (MIHOP). That is my opinion and I'll state that clearly. I may be naive, but I can't think of any long term benefit from it. The truth would eventually come out and it would take hundreds or thousands of persons to keep the lid on.

Just my two cents, like I said. I think if the other side of it, the side of the persons behind the conspiracy rumors, if they don't continue to hype it as a conspiracy they don' sell tapes or make money. Sounds to me like the old adage "don't bother me with facts, I'm too busy believing what I want.

K4

88 posted on 04/29/2006 8:21:21 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (My Pug is On Her War Footing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=125

Knock yourself out.


89 posted on 04/29/2006 8:24:28 PM PDT by bad company (Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

That's along the lines of how I am thinking. If the government MIHOP or LIHOP, of what benefit was it? To get us into a war? We've gone into war on lesser pretexts than that. Shoot, the USS Cole should have been enough to send us into take care of the bad guys. But, of course, we know that was never the priority of that presidency.

I think that some of the people pushing Conspiracy theories aren't necessarily greedy for money. Some are confused. Some have some legitimate points (i.e., 'Arkanicides'). Some take something a little too far from what may have been a legitimate point at first. And some are just naturally suspicious. Oh, and some just want to say the Bush is the anti-Christ so of course if something bad happens he had something to do with it.

Still, as long as these things are being discussed, I believe that it is important to continually spell out why things have merit and why they don't. Sticking our heads in the sand because we're tired of hearing the garbage doesn't make it go away. I got the stuff in my email TODAY. I may be able to take what I have learned from our discussions and at least get my conspiratorial friend to look at it a different way. He's a well meaning guy- and on some things, I think he's probably more right than wrong (just not on the Twin Towers).


90 posted on 04/29/2006 9:05:13 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

If you are here to discuss current news items, then why are you in the General Chat forum whining because I posted something on a conspiracy theory? Your position in General/Chat betrays your motivation.

And my searching or not searching isn't your concern. You don't like it, leave the thread alone. You've contributed to keeping it alive more than just about anyone just by coming on here bickering about its existence.


91 posted on 04/29/2006 9:10:03 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
I've heard that crapola. They can't get around the facts: jet was full throttle full of fuel when it hit at that speed there was NOTHING left. So all these idiots assume it could not have been a jet airliner. They try to say it was a missile hit...idiots idiots idiots....
92 posted on 04/29/2006 9:12:09 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bad company

Sorry, I try to avoid giving that website any hits.


93 posted on 04/29/2006 9:12:32 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

94 posted on 04/29/2006 9:17:38 PM PDT by JRios1968 (In memoriam...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

:) I was wondering when he would make an appearance.


95 posted on 04/29/2006 9:18:17 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Something tells me the only reason you posted this thread was to see it. I can see no other rational reason to post a so-called "story" that has been debunked extensively in the last 4+ years.


96 posted on 04/29/2006 9:24:12 PM PDT by JRios1968 (In memoriam...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

There has been some good scientific shows explaining the colapse.


97 posted on 04/29/2006 9:25:06 PM PDT by FOG724
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

I can't help what you can or can not see.


98 posted on 04/29/2006 9:25:18 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Only a troll would imply that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled implosion.

Ignore this idiot as such.


99 posted on 04/29/2006 9:27:13 PM PDT by Emmet Fitzhume (America: Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

I am a civil engineer by education. I watched the entire 9/11 sequence develop, from shortly after the first tower was hit...I was watching on TV as the second tower got hit.

20 minutes prior to the first collapse, I told a friend "both towers will come down today." My friend asked how could that be, and I explained to her in full detail how it would happen. I even told her which tower would collapse first, and why.

Don't come selling your "friend"'s little conspiracy theory to me...I am not buying.


100 posted on 04/29/2006 9:39:12 PM PDT by JRios1968 (In memoriam...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson