Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rush To Nuclear War With Iran [retread troll zotted]
self

Posted on 04/12/2006 11:03:38 AM PDT by bj1998

Is Your Entire Country On Crack?

Speaking as a Canadian who is fond of judicious language, I feel that this situation deserves careful and measured thought. So let me just open with:

Is your entire f*cking country on crack??? Are all you Americans out of your cotton picking minds??? Are you completely freaking delusional? Homicidal? Psychotic? Have you lost any shred of a moral compass? WHAT IN THE NAME OF JESUS H. CHRIST ON A CRUTCH IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE!!!!!

Let me offer up one small datum which may completely change the equation for you: According to the CIA (If they have any credibility left.) Iran is at least five years away from a nuclear weapon.

Five years.

Five years is time for diplomacy to accomplish a hell of a lot.

I would also point out that the Atomic Energy Commission, various other international bodies and other inspections have essentially found no sign that Iran is even working on a nuclear weapon.

The only actual evidence that Iran has anything close to nuclear weapons technology is blueprints *that the CIA gave to them!*

Have you all forgotten that the evidence on Iraq was spectacularly wrong? Have you all ignored the fact that it was fabricated? Why then are we going down the exact same road of stage managed, fabricated pseudo-evidence and wild-ass hysteria?

What is wrong with you people?

This entire crisis has been manufactured, and has been years in the making.

Stop and think back five years. What did we have five years ago? A moderate reformist Iranian government making overtures to the United States, rebuilding its relationship with Europe, liberalizing its society, and modernizing its economy.

9/11 comes along, the Iranians are overflowing with sympathy. Mass candlelit vigils are held in Tehran. Iran offers aid and cooperation.

Iran hates the Taliban who have executed Iranian diplomats and massacred Afghan Shiites. Iran hates Saddam Hussein. Iran hates Al Qaeda which is a Sunni Fundamentalist organization which declares Shiites infidels and subhuman.

Iran shares its intelligence with America - they even arrested Taliban members and handed them over to US custody.

So we've got the Iranian spring; things are finally going to sort out.

And what happens? The Bush administration rebuffs every Iranian overture and does its best to instigate a cold war. Afghanistan is invaded, and suddenly, the Iranians are looking at American troops and allies on their eastern border. Then Iraq is invaded, and American troops and allies on their western border. Then bases and treaties in Uzbekistan, and whoops, there's more American troops and allies on the northern border. The Persian Gulf is filled with American warships and carrier fleets.

Now the Iranians are surrounded. And the tough talk is constant. Iran is part of the 'Axis of Evil' and Americans tell each other "Baghdad, humph, real men go to Tehran." Essentially, America has been threatening military action against Iran for the last five years, and has surrounded the country on every side with troops, bases and allies.

American aircraft invade Iranian airspace regularly, American special forces undertake operations inside Iran and Americans regularly accuse Iranians of interference in Iraq.

Dick Cheney pontificates about Israel bombing Iran *after he has just handed over to Israel the long range bombers and bunker busting bombs* required to do the job.

Meanwhile, the United States undertakes economic warfare against Iran, interfering with its business dealings with third party countries, trying to scuttle a pipeline deal with India, and it goes on and on. The hysteria about the Iranians nuclear program is just more of the same.

Now how in God's Bloody Name do you think the Iranians are going to respond to that. Should they concede the nuclear program, abandon their pipeline project? If so, its not going to do them any good. America will just seek more concessions. Each surrender will be met by new demands. This isn't hard to figure out. It's exactly what Bush did with Iraq.

Perhaps overtures, good will gestures, trying to act like a peaceful nation. Did all those things, doesn't matter. The Bush administration is still on a collision course.

So, the Mullahs are concerned that they're faced with a homicidal crazy state, the Iranian people are scared. When people are scared and faced with an aggressive warmongering power which keeps threatening to attack them, continually trespasses on its borders and is undertaking economic warfare... who the hell are they going to elect? Ahminajad may be a crazy bastard, but you assholes, you utter assholes did every thing you could to elect him short of donating 50,000 Diebold machines and mailing his party the trapdoor codes.

So, having pursued a psychotically aggressive course, you've backed Iran into a corner, and engineered a regime which refuses to back further.

And *you* are the victims in all this? *You* are the ones under threat? It's *self defense*????

And of course, you goofily believe that you can just bomb or nuke Iran with impunity?

Holy Microeconomic Theory Batman! Iran's nuclear facilities are distributed across the country and in hardened sites near population centers. So any strike that cripples a significant portion of Iran's nuclear capacity will inevitably be so large and kill so many people that its going to be tantamount to inviting full scale war.

Think about that. Iran is 70 million people, an area five times the size of Iraq, not disemboweled by 12 years of sanctions and air raids. On the other side of the coin, America's ground army is busted and tied down in Iraq. There's no troops to throw at a major Iranian military force, so you have to hope that bombing will do the trick. The occupation forces in Iraq are in occupation and not territorial defense mode. And Iraq is 65% Shiites who are probably not going to be happy that you're blowing up their brother Shiites. Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz is so narrow that sinking one supertanker will block it indefinitely, and Iran borders the straight on three sides. Block Hormuz and any naval groups inside the Persian Gulf are trapped there. Any naval groups outside the Persian Gulf are trapped outside. Forget about any oil coming out of the Persian Gulf from Iraq, Kuwait, Quatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia or the UAE. Think about what

In short its so appallingly stupid and colossally risky, that I can see why your idiots in charge might consider using nuclear weapons. But throw a few nukes around and see how the rest of the world reacts? Every dirt-wad country is going to be mortgaging the Presidential palace to get its own nuclear deterrent from Pakistan or North Korea. How do you feel about the Indonesian Bomb, the Malaysian Bomb, the Thai Bomb, the Myanmar Bomb, the Algerian Bomb, the Saudi Bomb, the Egyptian Bomb, the Brazilian Bomb, the Argentine Bomb, the Venezuelan Bomb, the Cuban Bomb, the Japanese Bomb, the Canadian frigging Bomb. You are no longer trustworthy. North Korea, always borderline psychotic is going to be mondo difficult to deal with. You've just guaranteed yourself a full fledged nuclear arms race, balls to the wall with both Russia and China, and quite possibly Europe.

And of course there's no guarantee that the rest of the world will allow this. Do you want an armed standoff with the Russians. Suppose they 'loan' their finest interceptor jets, pilots and radar systems to the Iranians... Do you want to meet *that* on a bombing raid? And if you do meet *that* what are you going to do when half your planes are blasted out of the skies conducting an illegal raid on civilian populations in a foreign country? Cry? Send a harsh note?

Launch a first strike?

What happens if the Chinese decide to hold Taiwan and South Korea hostage? What do you do? Back off Iran or sell out East Asia?

Hell, in that kind of standoff, someone sneezes and its not going to matter who launched a first strike.

Or would you like an economic standoff, say with Europe, or with Japan and China. Suppose that the Europeans or Chinese decide "screw the worldwide depression, you assholes are just too dangerous to have around." Trillions of dollars get dumped on the market, loans get called in, the bottom drops out of your dollar, its thousand per cent inflation and no manufacturing base and your own trade embargoes. So much for America.

I mean, its morally wrong, its stupid on every level. And yet here you are discussing why maybe you should get out in front of the Republicans on this, or planning your surrender to Bush. Why are you even discussing this?

What is wrong with America?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: canucklehead; dusuxxorz; ibtz; iran; irannukes; kittychow; rant; retread; seymourbuttshersch; takeoffyahoser; troll; vikingkitties; vk; windowlicker; wwiii; zot; zotwanker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-217 last
To: Mr. Silverback
Correction:
" Oh, one other thing: In 1945, the U.S official estimate for when the Soviets would get the A-Bomb was 20 years minimum. It took them five years with the help of stealing the nuclear secrets from the USA "

And God only know what else they and China top secret information from the USA have stolen.
201 posted on 04/12/2006 7:37:39 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Typo correction :

( What most countries and people don't understand is, when they mouth off their bogus rhetoric about how the USA is the )
202 posted on 04/12/2006 7:45:18 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Sorry about the typo, " I meant in the first line, when they mouth off their bogus rhtoric " not when you.


203 posted on 04/12/2006 7:46:42 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: bj1998
Apparently you missed the warning label when you sat down to post this cr@p...

Image hosting by Photobucket

204 posted on 04/12/2006 8:09:15 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2
"GeorgefromGeorgia ought to pull his head out of his a$$, but its likely been up there so long it is permanently stuck in that position. I'll bet this clown still wears tie-dyed t'shirts and listens to Joan Baez 8-tracks as he cruises Toronto in his VW minibus."

We may have a failure to communicate (hopefully not as bad as Cool Hand Luke). My comment posted was that I would take any bets that if we did nothing, Iran would for sure have a nuke by 2011 (five years). I agree with you that they will probably have a nuke sooner than 5 years.

Your statement (above) was crude, off base and entirely uncalled for. Be assured that I have NEVER worn tie-dyed shirts or acted like a hippie. I suggest that before you attack anyone in an ad homonym fashion, especially another FREEPER, that you opt to address the issues.
205 posted on 04/13/2006 5:26:54 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

Absolutely right. The LAST step to building a bomb is acquiring the fissile material. No point doing that until you have the rest of the machine (bomb) built. BTW, this suggests that they have made/stolen the special components that are also on the proscribed list for international trade.


206 posted on 04/13/2006 8:19:53 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

Sorry GfromG. Got you mixed up with someone else. Try to be more careful next time. I humbly apologize.


207 posted on 04/13/2006 11:23:42 AM PDT by attiladhun2 (evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2

No problem. Thanks, I'm glad it was a mixup.


208 posted on 04/13/2006 12:31:45 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

209 posted on 04/13/2006 12:34:37 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Whomever you linked that from apparently doesn't like you (or anyone else) hotlinking their pics!


210 posted on 04/13/2006 12:37:27 PM PDT by Toby06 (Make illegal immigration illegal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Oh, wait a minute, did you mean ME? I got it from Strangecosamos, didn't know any sourec-accreditation was required.


211 posted on 04/13/2006 12:40:11 PM PDT by Toby06 (Make illegal immigration illegal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Toby06
I got it from Strangecosamos, didn't know any sourec-accreditation was required.

It is a standard joke...

Heah, I saw that "No Hotlinking" post in there somewhere. I wonder what the pic was supposed to be (maybe I'll ping the poster)

212 posted on 04/13/2006 12:44:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Trampled by Lambs

You got a "no hot linking" substitute message.

What was it supposed to be?


213 posted on 04/13/2006 12:45:28 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Oops, try this:


214 posted on 04/13/2006 12:57:31 PM PDT by Trampled by Lambs (I think, therefor I Zot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Trampled by Lambs

Pretty funny!

and herewith stolen ;)


215 posted on 04/13/2006 1:00:37 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Trampled by Lambs; Sloth; freedumb2003
Cool! The 2006 edition is out! Stolen also!

(Added to the library, this edition by FReeper sloth: ;o) )


216 posted on 04/14/2006 2:17:14 AM PDT by Watery Tart (Feingold (CFR-WI): "[W]hy (were my) actions necessary, appropriate, or legal?" Censure whom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: bj1998
Wow.. he's from Canukistan yall.

217 posted on 04/18/2006 5:10:26 PM PDT by conservative_crusader (The voice of truth, tells me a different story. The voice of truth says do not be afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-217 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson