The the disappointment of many, the suspects apparently are not black.
1 posted on
02/07/2006 9:45:35 PM PST by
Shade2
To: zaxxon; Balding_Eagle; wideawake; xsrdx; Republicus2001; ishabibble; newgeezer
2 posted on
02/07/2006 9:48:03 PM PST by
Shade2
To: Shade2
"The the disappointment of many, the suspects apparently are not black."
Strange comment...
3 posted on
02/07/2006 9:48:34 PM PST by
DocRock
To: Shade2
Well this also points out the silliness of the Hollywood myth of the romatic thief. Thieves look for the least dangerous victim of opportunity. So they are properly called low-lifes who pick out the weak, ie elderly or in this case a 5 year old victim.
4 posted on
02/07/2006 9:48:52 PM PST by
JLS
To: Shade2
Not being black has absolutely nothing to do with it. If guilty, they are two POS.
6 posted on
02/07/2006 9:50:50 PM PST by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: Shade2
WTF do you mean "not black"?
Running and hiding?
7 posted on
02/07/2006 9:51:20 PM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the rear, or a Fool from any side.”)
To: Shade2
BREAKING: Los Angeles experiences its first ever gold chain yanking!
To: Shade2
Checked ITS posts all are about blacks or queers.
9 posted on
02/07/2006 9:54:30 PM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the rear, or a Fool from any side.”)
To: Shade2
Why do you think people would think the suspects were black when the crime scene video that TV has been showing clearly indicates they were not?
To: Shade2
"Snatching?" Is it that bad in CA? Should be more like felonious assault.
19 posted on
02/07/2006 10:27:33 PM PST by
quantim
(If the Constitution were perfect it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
To: Shade2
Where did that come from?
Your comment, I mean.
20 posted on
02/07/2006 10:41:05 PM PST by
Ronin
(When the fox gnaws.... SMILE!!!)
To: All
I told you so ping. See post 10 and my comments on that thread. BTW, people who are jumping on Shade2 are looking quite a bit presumptuous now, aren't they?
To: Shade2; zaxxon; wideawake; xsrdx; Republicus2001; ishabibble
I resent your charge. That charge can only be made from a racist viewpoint. I angrily demand an apology for that false charge.
My original assertion, which is based on a long history of reading Main Stream news reports, still stands. When the Main Stream news reports crime, and leaves out skin color as a descriptor of the perp, nearly 100% of the time the perp is minority. That kind of inaccurate, almost false, reporting has a long and unbroken history in the mainstream.
Apologise.
29 posted on
02/08/2006 7:41:52 AM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who have dementia.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson