Posted on 12/28/2005 11:49:10 AM PST by CougarGA7
My question is: Why didn't they tell anybody that Hillary Clinton played that skull island witch doctor woman???
Maybe a crane? Or he could have been towed back on a raft of some kind.
LOL.
I have a very low tolerancee for pain.
I will likely be a very poor test subject.
And Kong, well.. He'd be in a world of hurt.
I think they made Kong run around the ship until he was "all in."
If they do, it's a mix with the sheep wool.
LOL!! and I am a girl!
FTP?
THAT was funny!
Bump.
I'm sure that is coming. Japan is getting ready to inject an Asian elephant with mammoth DNA.
http://www-1.expo2005.or.jp/en/newstopics/2005/pdf/050617_press.pdf
> So they didn't even try to address that in the new movie?
>They could have at least tried to make it look like >helicopters moved him or something.
They were being faithful to the original 1933 classic, which also avoided the issue.
Indeed. Peter Jackson said that he did the movie this way as a nod to the original 1933 version.
Same way the Egyptians got those three-ton stone blocks up the sides of 500-feet-tall pyramids.
Leni
I finally saw King Kong today. The movie should have been shortened by at least one hour. This would have gotten rid of the excess CGI and slow parts. CGI should be apart of the movie, but not the movie itself. By shortening the movie the film would have been great!
If Peter Jackson has an extended cut of this, he is a very poor director and has no idea how to make a movie. King Kong is a very simple story to tell.
Hollywood has lost its way and cannot tell a great story anymore. It appears it has run out of ideas and screws up remakes of great films.
Thumbs Down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.