LCD= liquid crystal display
Plasma = Similar technology, except the liquid is plasma extracted from the human body.
bookmark bump
Course you could always wait till the next wave comes out. They have nano stuff that is thinner than paper. Your future TV will roll up and be hung on any wall or table you choose to move it to. I've seen the technology on TV already. It's not vaporware. You can have a 2 inch screen to 20 yards depending on your wallet. Quality was good, but not HDTV quality.
Plasmas are great initially, but you probably need to plan on replacing it every 2-3 years. LCDs should last longer.
If weight and space are not a problem, the best bang for buck is still a great big Hi-Def Ready CRT, with a flat, 4:3 aspect ratio screen. When you watch DVD movies, use widescreen with the English subtitles turned on. These will usually occupy the black bar at the bottom rather than cover part of the image, as would happen in a 16:9 set. But once you've installed this monster, get used to its position, because ease of mobility is definitely not a feature.
Starbucks? I've never been in one. Never used a cell phone. Never used the CD burner. This is all scary stuff!
The advantage of the DLP sets is that you can use them as giant computer monitors without burning-in the screen, the design avoid convergence problems, and they need little maintenance. (Of course, you can watch high-definition television programs on them too.)
The current Mac mini model is the small white box to the left of the set. The next Mac mini reportedly will include a DVR for recording shows, a DVD player/burner, all of the usual computer and Internet programs, etc., and it can connect to a Samsung DLP set via a VGA connector or DVI connector.
Now imagine surfing Free Republic on a 60-inch screen from your couch.
It doesn't matter. In five to eight years it will be obsolete and you'll have to buy some even newer technology anyway.
Check out www.plasmacity.com and have a look at the 55" Hitachi and 50" NECs. The price for Hitachi is great, but the 3 year warranty and great reviews here and elsewhere have sold me on NEC.
http://www.plasma-vs-lcd.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_television
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_display
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LCD_television
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display_television
The other day, my brother and I were looking at HD plasma TVs side by side with conventional definition LCD and plasma. The difference was stunning, with HD plasma far better than rival technologies. If price were no object. . .
Don't have a plasma TV but I did hear a lecture by a scientist who develops new display technologies. She mentioned that a problem of plasma displays is the heat they put out.
My advise is not waste your money. The prices for a new TV is insane. I'm not buying one, even with the switch to high definition broadcasts. There's not one program being broadcast worth an expenditure of over 2k for a frickin' TV.
Wouldn't know. I roast my own beans now. Much, much better.
Plasma is the more recent technology. I undertstand many set have a problem where the plasma leaks out after about4-5 years. If you're looking for something more reliable, stick with a tested, older technology. You'll get a better price than bleeding edge stuff.
With the quality of TV shows I`ll stick with radio thank you.
With the quality of TV shows I`ll stick with radio thank you.