You know, if someone who was a skyscraper structural engineer
and an expert on demolition came to me and suggested that it looked like explosives may have been involved, I'd listen with an open mind. Because certainly explosives are not unknown to al Qaeda.
But these tinfoil wackos always, invariably make the leap to 'it was an inside job' and MIHOP, at which point I flick their deranged theories like a booger. It's always about sliming President Bush. Always.
Here is a thought. Could it be that explosives were involved also? And the 'inside job' stories were disseminated to discredit that? That is a propaganda tactic. Present that A doesn't equal B because of the wrong reasons.
Early on when I first joined FR there were stories about questionable contractors. And there was construction going on in the towers.
Could some explosives been placed by contractors and the propaganda stories about 'inside job' been floated to discredit anyone as a conspiracy theorist for even looking into it?