Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sender
Here is a thought. Could it be that explosives were involved also? And the 'inside job' stories were disseminated to discredit that? That is a propaganda tactic. Present that A doesn't equal B because of the wrong reasons.

Early on when I first joined FR there were stories about questionable contractors. And there was construction going on in the towers.

Could some explosives been placed by contractors and the propaganda stories about 'inside job' been floated to discredit anyone as a conspiracy theorist for even looking into it?
90 posted on 11/12/2005 12:32:39 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia
It is possible that the airliners weren't the only weapons used that day. Before 9/11, anyone could have rolled tool chests, copiers, air conditioners in there and no one would have checked them out. Contractors could have done what they pleased. So yes, it's possible.

It just really irks me when the DUmmies claim that we did this ourselves so we could pillage the oil supply and torture peaceful citizens.

96 posted on 11/12/2005 12:46:02 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia

But in that case, why would it be necessary to hijack the planes?


124 posted on 11/12/2005 4:02:53 PM PST by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson