Posted on 11/11/2005 6:18:29 AM PST by Calpernia
Fifty-one seconds.
It separated a free education from a tuition bill of $189,000.
It was the difference between a framed West Point diploma and a "certificate of attendance."
It meant returning to Oakland and becoming a telecom salesman - instead of being sent to Iraq as a proud soldier.
For Brad Waudby, 51 seconds changed his life.
Waudby, a 6-foot-5-inch, 340-pound football player recruited for his skills on the offensive line, failed the running test on his West Point physical. He was supposed to run two miles in 16 minutes 36 seconds. It took him 17:27.
West Point had exempted Waudby from the test during his playing days, he said, but required him to take it when his football career ended.
Then, when he failed on his third and final try, the academy asked Waudby to pay all four years of his tuition and told him the military did not want his services, he said. Cadets, by law, get a no-cost education in return for five years of service.
He received no degree.
He has filed a federal lawsuit seeking his diploma and the free schooling he had expected.
He says he wants to serve his country.
"I was excited to do it," the former offensive tackle and guard said. "Especially after 9/11. My whole mind-set changed where I was determined to go."
West Point officials declined to comment on Waudby's case, but they acknowledged that the biannual physical fitness test has been modified for others in the past.
"It's inappropriate for me to discuss individual cadet records or other personnel matters," said Lt. Col. Kent Cassella, an academy spokesman. "The same holds true for matters under litigation."
Waudby has no regrets.
"I'm glad I went there," the 24-year-old said recently in his attorneys' office. "It gave me discipline. A sense of duty, honor."
Still, he longs for things he's been denied:
To receive his bachelor of science degree in systems engineering and law. To fight alongside his classmates in Iraq. To make his way through the ranks of the military. To go to law school. To take advantage of the lifelong network afforded to all "ring knockers" - a slang term for military academy graduates.
Destined for football
Waudby, who met his academic and moral requirements to graduate, had been exempt from running in previous years, his lawyers said, because the academy wanted him to retain his size while he played football. When he was admitted to the United States Military Academy Preparatory School at Fort Monmouth out of high school, Waudby said, he already exceeded the Army's height and weight requirements by 129 pounds.
He has always been big.
As a third-grader, just two years after beginning youth football, Waudby was shut out of the league because of his weight. He still played sandlot games and watched his friends play. But it wasn't until freshman year of high school that he was able to play his favorite sport in an organized league.
"My father played in high school," Waudby said. "He's been breeding me to play since I was born. My first Christmas present was a football.
"I guess I was built for it," he said.
While at the academy, Waudby played varsity his junior and senior years. An Army football Web site described him as "an impressive physical specimen ... a powerful performer who moves well for a big man." His time playing there was dismal. The Black Knights won only five games in the four years he was at the academy and only once while he was on the varsity.
Several top schools recruited Waudby, including Boston College, Syracuse, Rutgers and Northeastern universities, he said.
But his first recruitment letter was from West Point.
His dad's jaw dropped.
Brad Waudby Sr., the owner of Oakland Memorial Funeral Home, opened his son's eyes to what a life-enhancing opportunity the military academy could be.
"It was the structure and the discipline," said Waudby Sr., an Air Force veteran whose own father had served in the Army. "Not every kid gets the opportunity. I just thought it was a good thing and the right thing for him to do. And I still feel that today."
After some raucous visits to a few schools that were trying to recruit him, his dad leveled with Waudby.
"He said, 'Brad, be honest with yourself. You're not going to play football for the rest of your life. ... You might as well get an education first,'Ÿ" Waudby recalled.
Not just an education
But at West Point, the classroom is equal to the battlefield.
"You're not just here to get a college degree," academy spokesman Cassella said.
Cadets sign an "Oath of Allegiance" promising to complete their education and serve for eight years following graduation - five years on active duty and three in the reserves.
If they fail "voluntarily" or because of misconduct, cadets must reimburse the United States the cost of their education. Cadets who are discharged, however, are given the option to go on active duty or pay tuition, Cassella said.
Waudby's lawyers said he was not given that option because he was honorably discharged from the military and the academy at the same time.
Successful completion of the fitness test - which includes sit-ups, push-ups and a two-mile run - is an Army standard.
"The Army is a very physical profession," Cassella said. "Officers must be physically fit in order to perform their duties. And to set the standards for their soldiers."
There are instances where a cadet may be exempt from some or all of the test, he said. For example, a soldier recovering from a leg injury might walk for a certain distance within a certain time. Cassella would not discuss if or why Waudby was given an exemption.
"Relatively few" cadets who can't pass the test are allowed to remain at West Point and try again, he said. "We invest in these cadets' success," Cassella said. "We know the quality of cadets who come in here. We work hard to commission them as leaders in our Army."
West Point is deemed a "more selective" school by U.S. News and World Report's annual rankings. There are eight to 10 applicants each year for every one of the 1,200 open spots, Cassella said. And of the select group admitted, 20 percent never make it to graduation.
Waudby said he passed the push-up and sit-up tests at each attempt but failed the two-mile run.
He contends that over the four years he played on the Army football team, he was allowed to substitute cycling for running because of his size. Once his senior season concluded, West Point insisted that he pass the running requirement, his lawyers said.
The academy maintains that Waudby knew from the beginning that he'd have to pass the running portion of the test when his football career ended and before graduation.
Waudby's lawyers said he was given two chances to pass during his senior year. When he didn't make it by the time his classmates were to be commissioned, in May 2004, he was invited to return that fall and try again.
Waudby trained with a major who helped him set a pace. His lawyers said he was told the pace man would be allowed to run with him during the test, but when he arrived, he was told he had to do it alone.
The rest of the cadets complete the run en masse, his lawyers said. They can keep up with the front of the pack or stay in the middle. But with Waudby being the lone man on the track, he was at a disadvantage, they say.
After several months of limbo, and with his military status pending, Waudby was notified in July that he was being discharged. A month earlier, the academy had issued him a certificate of attendance in lieu of a diploma.
"It's like something you get from the back of a box of Cheerios," said Michael L. Detzky, one of his attorneys.
His lawyers said they were told Waudby could transfer his academic credits to a college in New York State, pay $1,500 and be issued a diploma from that school.
"It just seems so absurd that he would give four years to the academy," said Frederick W. Klepp, Waudby's other attorney. "Be academically qualified to graduate from the academy. Play football for them for four years, which is what they wanted. They recruited him. And now get a degree from some other school, with which he had no affiliation."
Waudby, meanwhile is trying to make something of his life in spite of this setback. He recently started working as a sales representative for a telecommunications company.
"Everything I learned in college, I can't really apply [outside the military]," he said.
His father, still proud of all his son has accomplished, chalks it up as a learning experience.
"It's made him stronger," he said. "And it's made our family stronger ... learning how to deal with adversity."
E-mail: pries@northjersey.com
I know! lets make a new law and make it apply to EVERYONE from now on because we (as a people) are too stupid to handle things on a case-by-case basis.
Remember, the military is government, and government is their own worst enemy and the problem.
As a tax payer who helped fund that education, in this case I do NOT want a refund, I want this guy in the military. He sounds like exactly the kind of guy we need.
Surely some bright FReeper can find a way we can try and send a message.
New law? No, this has been in place for DECADES. And the other little piece of information that is missing ... You are given MULTIPLE chances to complete the run on time. It's not a 1 Day test; it's a multi-week challenge; you only have to beat time ONCE. And yes, you also have months of 'Practice' in which to get into shape.
Successful completion of the fitness test - which includes sit-ups, push-ups and a two-mile run - is an Army standard.
So, let's make an exception to the rules for this guy ... because he's a Feakin' football player??!? The rules are in place, they are conveyed YEARS in advance, you are made aware of them on a daily basis. If ANYONE should be able to make time, one would think a athletic scholarship recipient would. Funny, 99.9% of the rest of the cadets make time with seconds/minutes to spare.
His lawyer was being interviewed on the radio while I was posting this.
The lawyer is a Vet and Waudby just wants to graduate. It isn't one of those 'damages, pain and suffering' lawsuits. Or at least, it didn't sound like it.
You want a guy in the military who can't run and make time; despite the fact that eveyrone else can make time? You are aware that a platoon is only as fast as the slowest member; so how many people should be killed because we drop standards so overweight and out of shape soldiers can join? Would you want him in your platoon? You have to move out; because you will otherwise be killed ... and you can't move out fast enough because you have a person who has "already exceeded the Army's height and weight requirements by 129 pounds."
Then you accuse the Liberals of reacting upon FEELINGS, instead of facts?
First, I am a totally out-of-shape 46-year-old 250-pound 5'4" white male. But if I had to run 2 miles in 16 minutes in order to save the price of a college education, I am absolutely certain I could do it in 3 months. Maybe I'll take this on as a challenge, I need to get back in shape.
Second, I don't want the money back either. I acknowledge we don't have all the information, but most football players get a scholarship to play football, and he did it.
I blame the school, and the rediculous push for success in sports. I don't think anybody should be allowed to skip the physicals simply because they play football. If they only allowed players who could meet the physical each year, we wouldn't have this problem. So maybe they wouldn't win as many games, they would be doing the right thing.
He can't go into the military. There is a reason you have to be able to run 8-minute miles -- you have to be able to keep up with your platoon. He was a lineman, and apparently has no ability to run at that speed, or at least no desire to get himself into the shape he needs to be to run at that speed.
And he probably shouldn't get a diploma, IF the diploma requirements include running that speed. You have to do what your diploma requires. Any other student who couldn't run that fast would have been out their freshman year, so I don't think he was harmed -- he got an excellent education for 4 years simply because he was a big fat guy who could block.
Yes, so one would think he would have lost some of those 129 lbs of excess cargo he was carrying. The rules are the rules; the Army lives by the rules; no one (even football players) get's to ignore the rules. That's why they are called 'Rules' and not 'Guidelines'.
So, at what point would an Army Officer Candidate expect to take responsibility for his own actions? I mean, you are expecting him to take responsibility for the lives of an an entire Squad, Platoon or Battalion ... so at what point is he responsible to look after himself?
If the rules were the rules, why did the school modify the requirement the entire time he was there?
They did.
They should not back bill him for the scholarship.
That's where we agree. For the money, I could drop my weight enough to make time; and given the career chose 'making time' is a yearly requirement. This is, as we agreed, for the safety of the Squad he is assigned to work with.
Second, I don't want the money back either. I acknowledge we don't have all the information, but most football players get a scholarship to play football, and he did it.
The Scholarship is CONDITIONAL, these terms are spelled out loud and clear; they are conveyed in no uncertain terms. If we make exceptions for this person and eat the education; how many other's will similarily take the education then refuse to 'make time' so they too can get a free education?
Football is a game, I wish colleges would simply declare it a commercial venture and divorce it from the academic field. Would you make this same plead for lenience for the Chess Club? How about the Volleyball team? Bowling?
I can't explain that. I can state, with good faith, that the people who did this have likely terminated their military career. The military is an 'Up' or 'Out' organization. This public blunder likely means no promotions.
But, my focus is on the individual. As a Lt. in the Army; this person would be responsible for the lives and well being of 'x' enlisted men. If he can't take responsibility for his weight, for getting in good enough shape to make time; would you want him in charge of the life of your son? This is one of the most basic requirement in the Army. This was not a surprise test, and it is a test that EVERYONE has to meet .... even football players.
And Good Lord; what is it about this hero worship of football players??!? He didn't save a life, he didn't cure cancer, he catches a ball for a living; or he gets in the way of someone else. Big Deal, whoop-de-freakin-do. Other than stroking some ego; they contribute nothing. Would you make the same plead for a computer programmer, mechanical engineer, medical personnel, communications, or logistics officer? This last group has the benefit of actually SAVING lives.
I agree with mud puppy. Someone did pee in your cereal this morning.
You are essentially posting to yourself at this point because you are arguing with yourself.
My post was, they modified the rules, they have no right to back charge for the scholarship.
You want to create a crazy arguement about football worshipping MIL requirements, continue posting to yourself. I'm not participating in that one.
My issue is 'lowering standards'. If you go to basic training, ROTC or the Academy you will see squads running miles in formation. You will see them drilling, and busting their collective butts. Sure, driving in a Humvee is great; until your vehicle takes a mortar. Then it's on foot and retreating to a defensible position.
Here we have a man who is 129 lbs over weight. Again, 129 lbs overweight; or MORBIDLY OBESE. So, let's assume that he's with a normal platoon. He can't run because he's too fat. He's too lazy to get into shape; but his platoon will accept that. So, the platoon carries their supplies plus his. They carry his weapon, so they can retreat faster. Now, the big target stubs his toe, falls down and/or gets a boo-boo. How many men will it take to carry him?
For four years, he was made aware of the requirements. The article doesn't say; but I'm under the impression you have to make time EVERY year. If I'm mistaken, my appologies; but I have close personal friends serving in Iraq. They have to carry 100 lb rucksacks, plus the 50 cal. They have to haul, or they will be targets. You don't train in the back of a HumVee; you train on foot. The HumVee is a great benefit; but you train without it. This person can't do the most basics without a HumVee.
The SCHOOL had him do the BIKE for the past four years because the SCHOOL didn't want Waudby to lose SIZE for the football they RECRUITED him for.
West Point officials declined to comment on Waudby's case, but they acknowledged that the biannual physical fitness test has been modified for others in the past.
He contends that over the four years he played on the Army football team, he was allowed to substitute cycling for running because of his size. Once his senior season concluded, West Point insisted that he pass the running requirement, his lawyers said.
Waudby said he passed the push-up and sit-up tests at each attempt but failed the two-mile run.
He contends that over the four years he played on the Army football team, he was allowed to substitute cycling for running because of his size. Once his senior season concluded, West Point insisted that he pass the running requirement, his lawyers said.
In my opinion, the basic physical standards in the Army are not that hard. It's not too much to ask a West Point cadet to pass.
But should they back bill him the scholarship after they modified the standards to benefit from his football skills?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.