1 posted on
11/08/2005 9:08:28 AM PST by
Millee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Millee
Let me by the first to say it: "NO PICTURES PLEASE!!!"
2 posted on
11/08/2005 9:10:00 AM PST by
Redcloak
(We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singin' "whiskey for my men and beer for my horses!")
To: Millee
set up in a way so that the state's Dating Services Law did not apply to itWhen a state has a "Dating Services Law," I think it's time to move to another state.
3 posted on
11/08/2005 9:11:33 AM PST by
Tax-chick
(I'm not being paid enough to worry about all this stuff ... so I don't.)
To: Millee; Owl_Eagle; Sam's Army; Lazamataz; Darksheare; pissant; Dashing Dasher; najida; ...
They need the Mad TV service, Lowered Expectations.
Sore Loser/Dateless Wonders PING!!!!
4 posted on
11/08/2005 9:12:43 AM PST by
Jersey Republican Biker Chick
(People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
To: Millee
Obligatory MoDo photo.
To: Millee
For a grand, I'd date them...once...
8 posted on
11/08/2005 9:15:02 AM PST by
dakine
To: Millee
9 posted on
11/08/2005 9:15:26 AM PST by
Choose Ye This Day
('Tis the part of the wise man to...not venture all his eggs in one basket. -- Cervantes)
To: Millee
Well, whatever the women are like, either the company was in compliance with the state's law, or not; and the company either performed as was contracted, or not. A simple business law case.
11 posted on
11/08/2005 9:16:46 AM PST by
Tax-chick
(I'm not being paid enough to worry about all this stuff ... so I don't.)
To: Millee
One woman was refunded the $1,000 she paid for a six-month membership. The other gets the nearly $3,800 she paid for a 54-month deal. I still can`t believe people pay that much for this.
13 posted on
11/08/2005 9:17:38 AM PST by
carlr
To: Millee
Okay.. the serious part first...
Great Expectations had claimed its operation was set up in a way so that the state's Dating Services Law did not apply to it. It plans to appeal the ruling.
Sounds like they set up their organization to cheat losers out of their $$$!
Okay - now back to the fun!
15 posted on
11/08/2005 9:18:26 AM PST by
Dashing Dasher
(I'm going to become rich as soon as I invent a device that allows you to smack people over the web!)
To: Millee
A friend signed up for Great Expectations. She filled out the questionnaire and sent in the fee. The result? She got a letter and her check back saying, "You are incompatible."
19 posted on
11/08/2005 9:20:44 AM PST by
ZGuy
To: Millee
Is there anyway I could sue all the girls who DON'T RETURN PHONE CALLS after a date? Could I at the very least have the right to make their life a living hell for a week?
32 posted on
11/08/2005 9:23:34 AM PST by
Clemenza
(In League with the Freemasons, The Bilderbergers, and the Learned Elders of Zion)
To: Millee
...massive... Most likely cause.
40 posted on
11/08/2005 9:26:23 AM PST by
Doohickey
(If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
To: Millee
the Internet dating service Great Expectations has to refund all their fees after dashing their expectations. One woman was refunded the $1,000 she paid for a six-month membership. The other gets the nearly $3,800 she paid for a 54-month deal. With rates like that, they ought to be called "Mind-boggling Outrageously Unrealistic Expectations".
76 posted on
11/08/2005 9:45:21 AM PST by
kevkrom
(Thank you... I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress. (And try the veal!))
To: Millee
Sounds like they got a rebate back on their Ugly Tax assessment.
To: Millee
Oh, and BTW, who the heck would fork over that kind of money for a lousy dating service? Take that same money and go on a singles cruise or something.
I can't imagine being that desperate for a man.
88 posted on
11/08/2005 9:56:56 AM PST by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: Petronski
bet they had a nasty attitude ping
99 posted on
11/08/2005 10:06:20 AM PST by
cyborg
(I'm on the 24 plan having the best day ever.)
To: Millee
Women Get Thousands After They Don't Get Dates The headline is misleading... the article says that they're only getting a refund, not getting any damages, et. al. The better story would be on why these people paid so much for a dating service in the first place, not on the fact that they got a refund because it didn't work.
104 posted on
11/08/2005 10:14:12 AM PST by
kevkrom
(Thank you... I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress. (And try the veal!))
To: day10
We're over here if you want a couple laughs...
229 posted on
11/08/2005 12:08:38 PM PST by
EX52D
To: Millee
Wow! $1000??
I am late to the thread, but for $1000+ I would have a LOT of epectations..........
233 posted on
11/08/2005 12:13:28 PM PST by
day10
(Wherever you come near the human race there's layers and layers of nonsense.)
To: Millee
Which reminds me of the time I sent my picture to a lonely hearts club. They sent it back, sayin' they weren't that lonely.
339 posted on
11/08/2005 1:18:32 PM PST by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
