Posted on 07/15/2005 5:21:02 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
Our technology is close to this devleopment already.
I DIDNT say she did. Those maps are more professionally drawn versions if the Zeta Reticuli.
You wrote: "How did abductee Betty Hill manage to draw an accurate picture of a distant star system years before it was discovered by astronomers?"
And I mentioned that it didn't look like a map, much less accurate. Now that I take a look at it, it looks more like a flashlight.
And then you presented me with more professional maps. But not of Betty Hill. We were talking about BH's maps, not professional maps.
Betty Hills' so-called accurate map of a distant star system looks like a scribble my daughter could have made.
LOL! That ain't no map. That ain't no accurate, and that ain't a distant (nor near) star system.
The resemblance of B.H. map to the professional one is about the same as my rendetion of the Mona Lisa would be to the original.
(I can't draw squat)
Lowbridge, you may want to check out THE HILL ALIENS Part of Chapters 11 & 12 ... you may find it quite interesting.
What's the margin of error? ;-)
Not illegal in California.
Oh, and for anyone interested, they finally synthesized element 115 - and it's not stable, so Bob Lazar is discredited.
And I mentioned that it didn't look like a map, much less accurate.
True. Your words were: "That's "an accurate picture of a distant star system?" And I pointed out that it was drawn by hand under hypnosis. So I can understand not accepting hand drawn maps under hypnosis.
Now that I take a look at it, it looks more like a flashlight.
And the big dipper looks like....a big dipper.
And then you presented me with more professional maps. But not of Betty Hill. We were talking about BH's maps, not professional maps.
I presented the professional maps because obviously you didnt want to accept a hand drawn map by someone under hypnosis (which is understandable).
Astronomers at Ohio State University had a computer put them in their exact position out beyond the double star system of Zeta Reticuli 1 and Zeta Reticuli 2--220 trillion miles, 37 light years from earth, looking toward our sun. The computer duplicated with virtually no variation, the map of Betty Hill.
http://ufocasebook.com/Hill3.html
Betty Hills' so-called accurate map of a distant star system looks like a scribble my daughter could have made.
Well I'm sorry that Betty Hill's profession was not professional map maker.
LOL! That ain't no map. That ain't no accurate, and that ain't a distant (nor near) star system.
It's a map, it's accurate, It's the Zeta Reticuli.
You've brought out some good points, although the conclusions might be a bit hasty IMHO.
I've considered the issue in a different vein.
I've found remarkable similarity of the style of problem between discerning supernatural phenomenon and the 'UFO/alien' issues.
In both cases, numerous eyewitness testimonies have provided the basis of assertions that these phenomenon exist. In both cases the testimonies indicate other persons are involved in the reported phenomenon and that said persons are able to perform supernatural feats.
To argue UFO/aliens do not exist because insufficient reproducible evidence exists is a poor argument. Considering a good percentage of humanity rejects even the historicity of Jesus Christ, not to mention his ressurrection and status as the Son of God on similar premise, for those who testify to His status as Lord and Savior, the counterargument for lack of evidence regarding UFO/aliens appears even more arrogant and untrustworthy.
Considering the similarities between UFOlogy and Theology, yet also their differences, I suspect many of the problematic areas of UFOlogy might be better understood upon a btter grasp of Theology. Especially since in Scripture we are warned of deceiving spirits and malevolent persons in the spiritual domain. This revelation from God is far more truthful than following a materialist perspective that an anthropology from another world travelled billions and billions of miles only to manifest a primeivel fascination with human tissue sampling,..or else rejecting even the existence of such phenomenon.
"The burden of proof is on those making the claims, not those who find the data dubious."
Actually, if there is a burden of proof, it is on those who, through denial, are accusing lots of people of being liars, fools, cads, etc.
And no one is under any obligation to please the deniers with data or anything else. **** 'em.
Refuting Fermi: No Evidence for Extraterrestrial Life?
National Institute for Discovery Science | John B. Alexander, Ph.D
Posted on 01/02/2005 4:43:04 AM PST by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1312384/posts
Please put me on the Art Bell/weird/Ufology ping list!
Me too!
Me too!
Thanks!
May see if I can post some docs from this site. Some good qulity reports from quality, well trained observers:
http://www.nuforc.org/
Well put post, BTW, Thanks.
I have absolutely no doubt that the universe if full of all kinds of life but the lights in the sky could more easily be time machines from our own future than alien space craft, IMHO.
I've been looking for hard evidence in the sense of hardware. I have also been watching the sky since Sputnik 1. If something is going on, there ought to be some actual evidence besides mysterious scoops and Moses-like burns, but so far, nothing.
Please put me on the Art Bell/weird/Ufology ping list!
Me also! and...thanks!!
I agree.IMO,even if there is intelligent life out in space,the chances of us ever meeting are maybe 1 in a billion?Too many conditions have to be met,and as you pointed out we're nowhere near the necessary technological level.
UFO list? Yeah, I'll try it for a while, if it's no trouble.
Thanks for the ping.
I think it's not big news that alien visitation is *unproven.* To most of us, anyway [Quix :-)]. In that sense, the article does nothing more than state the obvious.
The fact that so many highly respected professionals have witnessed UFO's, combined with the real possibility of their existence, should at the very least be provocative to all of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.