Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

You wrote: "How did abductee Betty Hill manage to draw an accurate picture of a distant star system years before it was discovered by astronomers?"

And I mentioned that it didn't look like a map, much less accurate. Now that I take a look at it, it looks more like a flashlight.

And then you presented me with more professional maps. But not of Betty Hill. We were talking about BH's maps, not professional maps.

Betty Hills' so-called accurate map of a distant star system looks like a scribble my daughter could have made.

LOL! That ain't no map. That ain't no accurate, and that ain't a distant (nor near) star system.


23 posted on 07/15/2005 8:12:42 PM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: TAquinas

The resemblance of B.H. map to the professional one is about the same as my rendetion of the Mona Lisa would be to the original.

(I can't draw squat)


24 posted on 07/15/2005 8:15:00 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TAquinas
You wrote: "How did abductee Betty Hill manage to draw an accurate picture of a distant star system years before it was discovered by astronomers?"

And I mentioned that it didn't look like a map, much less accurate.

True. Your words were: "That's "an accurate picture of a distant star system?" And I pointed out that it was drawn by hand under hypnosis. So I can understand not accepting hand drawn maps under hypnosis.

Now that I take a look at it, it looks more like a flashlight.

And the big dipper looks like....a big dipper.

And then you presented me with more professional maps. But not of Betty Hill. We were talking about BH's maps, not professional maps.

I presented the professional maps because obviously you didnt want to accept a hand drawn map by someone under hypnosis (which is understandable).

Astronomers at Ohio State University had a computer put them in their exact position out beyond the double star system of Zeta Reticuli 1 and Zeta Reticuli 2--220 trillion miles, 37 light years from earth, looking toward our sun. The computer duplicated with virtually no variation, the map of Betty Hill.

http://ufocasebook.com/Hill3.html

Betty Hills' so-called accurate map of a distant star system looks like a scribble my daughter could have made.

Well I'm sorry that Betty Hill's profession was not professional map maker.

LOL! That ain't no map. That ain't no accurate, and that ain't a distant (nor near) star system.

It's a map, it's accurate, It's the Zeta Reticuli.

http://www.nicap.dabsol.co.uk/hillmap.htm

29 posted on 07/16/2005 5:36:17 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson