And I mentioned that it didn't look like a map, much less accurate.
True. Your words were: "That's "an accurate picture of a distant star system?" And I pointed out that it was drawn by hand under hypnosis. So I can understand not accepting hand drawn maps under hypnosis.
Now that I take a look at it, it looks more like a flashlight.
And the big dipper looks like....a big dipper.
And then you presented me with more professional maps. But not of Betty Hill. We were talking about BH's maps, not professional maps.
I presented the professional maps because obviously you didnt want to accept a hand drawn map by someone under hypnosis (which is understandable).
Astronomers at Ohio State University had a computer put them in their exact position out beyond the double star system of Zeta Reticuli 1 and Zeta Reticuli 2--220 trillion miles, 37 light years from earth, looking toward our sun. The computer duplicated with virtually no variation, the map of Betty Hill.
http://ufocasebook.com/Hill3.html
Betty Hills' so-called accurate map of a distant star system looks like a scribble my daughter could have made.
Well I'm sorry that Betty Hill's profession was not professional map maker.
LOL! That ain't no map. That ain't no accurate, and that ain't a distant (nor near) star system.
It's a map, it's accurate, It's the Zeta Reticuli.